Miles reads this as rub` qist (not rub` qist zayt), but the za' of "zayt" seems to be visible and the die seems to be the
same as EAGS.14, CAM.72-73, B.227-232; 1965.144.63, 1984.106.4
1955.86.2http://numismatics.org/collection/1955.86.2mb_physical,osm,imperiumobjecthttp://numismatics.org/search/id/https://numismatics.org/themes/mantisdisplaypk.eyJ1IjoiYmhpaWJuZXIiLCJhIjoiY2xlZWZqZmJjMGdheDNwcW1qaHM2MWZ4cSJ9.oR2ZyKdE7BYKzQkjiotNSghttp://numismatics.org/search/manifest/1955.86.2American Numismatic Society