Western Coinages of Nero

Author
Mac Dowall, David W.
Series
Numismatic Notes and Monographs
Publisher
American Numismatic Society
Place
New York
Date
Source
Donum
Source
Worldcat
Source
Worldcat Works

License

CC BY-NC

Acknowledgement

Open access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities/Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program.

Export

Table of Contents

FRONT

BODY

1. CHRONOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK

Nero's Titulature

The basic chronological framework for the arrangement of Nero's coinages is provided by the elements of imperial titulature found on the coins. Nero held the consulship five times, in 55, 57, 58, 60 and 68, 1 and his first and fourth consulships are recorded on the gold and silver. 2 Considerably more important are the series of tribunician dates found on the pre-reform aurei and denarii and on a limited number of the later sestertii and dupondii, and the use of "imperator" as a praenomen during the later years of his principate. Unfortunately both the reckoning of Nero's tribunicia potestas, and the date when he assumed the praenomen imperator have been disputed.

Tribunicia Potestas

Nero celebrated the renewal of his tribunician power on 4 December, 3 fifty two days after his dies imperii of 13 October. 4 He counted it from 4 December 54, and added one to each TRP number on 4 December in each succeeding year. Apart from this unusual starting date, there is no need to assume any irregular reckoning.

The supposed difficulty in calculating Nero's TRP has been the apparently contradictory entries in two surviving fragments of the Arval Acta. For 3 January 59 Nero's titles are given as TRP V …, 5 but both the general heading for 60 and the specific entry for 3 January of that year have TRP VII IMP VII, 6 whereas on a normal reckoning one would expect to find TRP VI IMP VII. This gave rise to Mommsen's view that during 59 Nero changed his TRP renewal day to 10 December (the day of the consilia) and subsequently counted TRP I as 15 October to 9 December 54 with TRP II as 10 December 54 to 9 December 55. Nero would thus regard TRP VII as 10 December 59 to 9 December 60. 7 We now know that the Arval Acta commemorated Nero's dies imperii on 13 October in 58 4 and the bestowal of his tribunicia potestas on 4 December in both 57 and 58 3 —the sole years for which the relevant parts of the Acta survive. Any alterations, therefore, in numbering Nero's TRP cannot have been occasioned by a change in the starting date of the tribunician year. The 4 December was already in use by 57, whereas the discrepancy in the numbering of Nero's TRP does not appear until after the entry for 59.

The other epigraphic and numismatic evidence 8 supports a straightforward reckoning of Nero's TRP from 4 December 54. Most inscriptions merely establish a connection between a particular TRP date and the number of an imperial salutation. Three inscriptions, however, have an additional external date. The military diploma in Vienna granted to Iantumarus 9 is unfortunately indecisive. Although it gives a consular dating AD VI NON IVL CN PEDANIO SALINATORE L VELLEIO PATERCVLO COS besides TRIB POT VII IMP VII COS IIII in Nero's titles, the date of their suffect consulship is uncertain. 10 But the other two inscriptions are more helpful. Lucretianus' dedication from Luna 11 shows Nero as TRIB POTEST VIIII IMP VIIII and Poppaea as Poppaea Aug Neronis Caesaris Aug Germ. Poppaea gave birth to a daughter, Claudia, in 63 and both she and the child were given the title of Augusta immediately afterwards. 12 The Luna dedication thus supports the straight calculation which would make TRP VIIII December 62/63. On Mommsen's system TRP VIIII would have to be December 61/62 which is a year too early. The Boeotian inscription from Acraephia recording Nero's declaration of liberty to Greece 13 and Epameinondas' speech of thanks, has δημαρχικῆς ἐξουσίας τὸ τρισκαιδἐκατον. Hammond has shown that the assembly took place on 28 November 67, 14 and this again supports the straight calculation which would make TRP XIII December 66/67.

Nero's gold and silver coinage forms a regular series from TRP to TRP X without interruption, and gives no suggestion of any change in tribunician reckoning. The aurei and denarii of 60 have the normal COS IIII TRP VI. 15 This issue seems to be the production of a complete year, and its TRP date directly contradicts the entry in the Arval Acta of COS IIII TRP VII for 3 January of the same year.

In other circumstances one might have allowed the evidence of the Arval Acta, the record of a public college quite closely connected with the Imperial House, against the authority of a dedication from Luna and of an inscription from Boeotia; but the Luna dedication and Acraephia inscription are supported by the clear evidence of the COS IIII TRP VI aurei and denarii from the mint of Rome (see Table 1 below), an institution far more official and imperial than a public college. As these coins are struck from several distinct dies, this date can hardly be regarded as an error. The only evidence for the so called 'Arval reckoning' is the double entry in the Acta of COS IIII TRP VII for January 60, and a very good case can be made for regarding these as a mistake. There is in fact a surprisingly large number of minor errors in the Acta of this period, e.g.,

A.D. 57 16

l. 14. ob tribuniciae (sic) potestat. Neronis Claudi …

l. 23/4. immolavit/in sacram viam (sic) memoriae Cn ….

A.D. 58/9 17

l. 58. L. Piso L. f. magiter (sic)

l. 62/3. M. Apronius Saturnius (sic—for Saturninus)

A.D. 59/60 18

a. l. 15. C. Vipstanus (sic) Apronianus cos P Memmiu (sic)

l. 26. August Germanicii (sic) Iovi

d. l. 16. Caesari (sic) Aug Germanico (to agree with consule).

The imperial titles for 3 January 59, moreover, are given as TRIB POT V IMP VI COS III DESIG IIII; 19 a designation to COS IIII so far ahead as 3 January is most unlikely in view of the constitutional show which Nero's principate was anxious to maintain at this period 20 and it is likely that an entry proper to the closing months alone of the year has been put in full for 3 January. The entry COS IIII TRP VII for 3 January 60 appears to be a closely comparable error. When the Acta for 60 were formally written up at the end of the year, the engraver apparently inserted the current year's date COS IIII TRP VII (December 60/61), for January 60—an error which it would be extremely easy to make by assimilation to the neighboring IMP VII.

End Notes

1
A. Degrassi, I fasti consolari dell'impero romano (Rome, 1952), pp. 15ff.
2
Cat. 3, 9ff., 37, 42 ff.
3
Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (hereafter CIL) VI, 2039, 2041.
4
CIL VI, 2041.
5
CIL VI, 2041.
6
CIL VI, 2042.
7
Theodor Mommsen, Hermes 2 (1856), p. 56 and Römisches Staatsrecht II (3rd ed., Leipzig, 1887), pp. 796ff. Mommsen has been followed by B. W. Henderson, Life and Principate of the Emperor Nero (London, 1903), Appendix C., p.449; L. Constans, "Les puissances tribuniciennes de Néron," Comptesrendus de l'Académie des inscriptions et belle-lettres (CRAI) 1912, p. 385; E. A. Sydenham, The Coinage of Nero (London, 1920), pp. 23–28; and R. Cagnat, Cours d'épigraphie latine (4th ed., Paris, 1914), pp. 183ff. Mommsen's view has been attacked by H. F. Stobbs, Philologus 32 (1873), pp. 1–91; H. Dessau, Geschichte der römischen Kaiserzeit II (Berlin, 1926). p. 196, note 1 and in notes to inscriptions in Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae (ILS); H. Mattingly, "The Date of the 'Tribunicia Potestas' of Nero and the Coins," NC 1919, pp. 199–200 and "'TRIBVNICIA POTESTATE.'" JRS 1930, pp. 78–91 and M. Hammond, "The Tribunician Day During the Early Empire," Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 1938, pp. 23–32.
8
See Table 1, pp. 6–7 below.
9
CIL XVI, 4. (= ILS 1987).
10
Degrassi, I fasti, pp. 16–17.
11
CIL XI, 6955.
12
Tacitus, Annals xv.23. On the right hand edge of the stone of this dedication are the remains of the D and N, one above the other, which seem to stand for D(ivae Claudiae …) N(eronis …)—and provide an additional argument for dating the inscription to a.d. 63. It is interesting to note that Lucretianus was apparently very careful to record the imperial titulature correctly. His second dedication dated TRP XIII gave Nero the praenomen IMP, whereas his dedication of a.d. 63 did not. The numismatic evidence shows that Nero assumed the praenomen IMP during the course of TRP XII.
13
Inscriptiones Graecae (IG) VII, 2713.
14
Hammond, "Tribunician Day," p. 28, following M. Holleaux, BCH 1888, pp. 510–28 and more fully in his Discours prononcé par Néron à Covinthe en rendant aux Grecs la liberté, 1889; and Dittenberger, IG VII, 479.
15
Cat. 9, 42.

Praenomen Imperator

The other important chronological indication is Nero's use of IMP as a praenomen 21 from 66. All the known inscriptions dated TRP XII (December 65/66) and later have the praenomen IMP, whereas those dated TRP—TRP XI never have it. The Acta for 66 repeatedly refer to IMP NERO 22 whereas in the proceedings up to and including 60 (the last year before 66 where Nero's titles are recorded) Nero is never given the praenomen. Titinius' dedication at Luna dated TRP XIII IMP XI COS IIII (December 66/67) 23 is to Diva Poppaea and Imp Nero, whereas his earlier dedication in TRP VIIII (62/63) 24 repeatedly gives Nero's titles without the praenomen. The Acraephia inscription 25 dated TRP XIII gives Nero the praenomen αὐτοκράτωρ; and the Sardinian milestone dated TRP XIII IMP XI 26 has the praenomen IMP. An apparent exception, the stone from Casino 27 (no longer extant), seems to have been incorrectly transcribed. It is reported without the praenomen and dated TR POT XIII IMP VIII (sic). But this is an impossible combination which cannot be accepted, and TR POT VIII IMP VIII, a conjunction known from another inscription, 28 is the obvious emendation.

Sestertii and dupondii with TRP XIII all have the praenominal IMP and so do the rare coins dated TRP XIV. But the praenomen was never used on the aurei and denarii dated TRP—TRP X, 29 nor on the cuirassed bust sestertii. 30 The date on these has been variously read as TR POT XI PPP, 31 TR POT XII PP, 32 TR POT XI PIP, 33 TR POT XI PPI, 34 and TR POT XIIII; 35 but all the specimens which the author has examined are struck from the same obverse die with TR POT XI PPP. 36

The dated and undated coinage, moreover, shows clearly that once adopted, the use of the praenomen remained the regular form. The most mature portraits of Nero, with a thick treatment of the neck and a heavily developed jowl, are always found on coins with the praenomen.

The terminus post quem for the assumption of the praenomen is given by the cuirassed bust sestertii dated TRPOTXIPPP and the three inscriptions dated TRPXI. The terminus ante quem is fixed by the entries in the Arval Acta for 66, with the caveat, perhaps, that the titulature may have been correct only for the end of the year when the record was completed. Within these limits it is difficult to be more precise. Either the Vinician conspiracy of 66, 37 or the ceremonial reception of Tiridates at Rome during the summer of the same year 38 are equally possible occasions. But although the precise context remains obscure, the praenomen is most important chronologically and enables us to distinguish the later groups in the undated coinages.

Table I. Evidence for TRP of Nero
TRP Aurei Cat. 2, 3.
Denarii Cat. 36, 37.
TRP II Aurei Cat. 4.
Denarii Cat. 38.
Inscr. AE 1897.30 (IMP II COS).
TRP III Aurei Cat. 5, 6.
Denarii Cat. 39.
Inscr. CIL II, 183 (IMP III COS II DES III); II 4734 (IMP III COS II DES III).
TRP IIII Aurei Cat. 7.
Denarii Cat. 40.
Inscr. CIL IX, 4115 (IMP COS III); VII, 12 (IMP IIII COS IIII sic); XII, 5471 (IMP IIII COS III PP); XII 5473/5; III 346 (IMP V COS III).
TRP V Aurei Cat. 8.
Denarii Cat. 41.
Inscr. CIL II, 4657 (IMP II sic); II 4652 (IMP IIII sic); II 4683 (IMP IIII sic); VI 2042 (IMP VI).
TRP VI Aurei Cat. 9.
Denarii Cat. 42.
TRP VII Aurei Cat. 10, 11, 12, 13.
Denarii Cat. 43, 44, 45, 46.
Inscr. CIL XVI, 4 (IMP VII COS IIII); VI 2042 (IMP VII COS IIII).
TRP VIII Aurei Cat. 14, 15, 16.
Denarii Cat. 47, 48, 49.
Inscr. CIL III 6123 (IMP VIII COS IIII PP); II 4888 (IMP VIIII COS IIII).
EE VIII p. 365 (COS IIII IMP VIII PP); AE 1900, 18 (IMP VIII COS IIII PP).
TRP VIIII Aurei Cat. 17, 18, 19.
Denarii Cat. 50, 51.
Inscr. CIL XI, 6955 (IMP VIII COS IIII).
TRP X Aurei Cat. 20, 21.
Denarii Cat. 52, 53.
Inscr. AE 1947, 167 (IMP VIII COS IIII PP).
TRP XI Inscr. CIL III, 6741/42 (COS IIII IMP VIIII); AE 1919, 22 (IMP COS IIII PP).
Sestertii Cat. 135, 136.
TRP XII
TRP XIII Sestertii Cat. 167–74.
Dupondii Cat. 238–41.
Inscr. CIL X 5171 (IMP VIII sic); XI 1331 (IMP XI COS IIII); IG VII 2713.
TRP XIV Sestertii Cat. 175, 176.
Inscr. CIL X 8014.
TRP XV

End Notes

16
CIL VI, 2039.
17
CIL VI, 2041.
18
CIL VI, 2042.
19
CIL VI, 2041.
20
C. H. V. Sutherland, Coinage in Roman Imperial Policy (London, 1951), pp. 152ff.
21
Later emperors regularly included the praenomen in their titulature from their accession, but this practice did not go back further than Vespasian. Cf. D. McFayden, History of the Title Imperator under the Roman Empire (Chicago, 1920).
22
CIL VI, 2044.
23
CIL XI, 1331.
24
CIL XI, 6955.
25
IG VII, 2713.
26
CIL X, 8014.
27
CIL X, 5171.
28
CIL XI, 1331.
29
Cat. 2–21, 36–53.
30
Cat. 135–36.
31
L. Laffranchi, "Il predicato P(ROCOS) dei sesterzi di Nerone e la Profectio Augusti," AttiMemIIN 4 (1921), pp. 47–62.
32
BMC RE I, p. 215, note on no. 111.
33
BMCRE I, no. 112.
34
BMCRE I, no. 111.
35
Cohen, Description historique des monnaies frappées sous l'empire romain (2nd ed., Paris, 1880–92) I. Nero 260 quoting the Wigan collection.
36
Ingemar König's recent study, "Der Titel «Proconsul» von Augustus bis Traian," SM 1971, pp. 42–53 republishes and illustrates six of these sestertii.
37
McFayden, Imperator, pp. 58–59.
38
Suetonius, Nero 13.2.

2. MINTS IN THE WEST

Mint Structure under Nero

Some varieties of obverse and reverse legend and type are characteristic of the mints at which the coinage was struck, and the chronological pattern of the issues cannot be determined until the basic mint structure is appreciated. The evidence of finds shows clearly that Rome was the sole mint for the issue of precious metals in the west, but that there were two principal mints, Rome and Lugdunum, for the aes coinages.

From these western issues we must be careful to distinguish the coinages struck by a wide range of mints in the eastern provinces. There is little difficulty over the product of city mints which employed Greek legends or of colonies which added to their Latin legends the initial letters of the name of the colony. 1 Rather less obvious are the coins with Latin legends struck by the imperial mints at Caesarea 2 and Antioch 3 and by the military mint in Moesia, 4 but each of these series is characterized by a distinctive range of reverse types.

The Gold and Silver Mint

Nero's coinage of aurei and denarii in both the dated and the undated series is remarkably uniform in style, type and content. Coins of the same uniform character seem to have circulated throughout the empire, in Italy, the east and the west. There appears to be no distinctive features of portraiture, legend, lettering or bust truncation that distinguish finds from one part of the empire from those in another. The different forms of obverse legend mark succes-

Table II. Types of Post-Reform Aurei Represented in Hoards
Romea Pompeii (1812) b Utrechtc Corbridge d Paris (1867) e Italica f Zirkowitz g Mardinh Liberchies i Total Approx. %
Cat.
22 4 2 2 1 2 4 2 2 7 26 7.5
23 2 4 1 3 3 1 3 1 18 5.2
24 8 1 2 1 3 10 3 28 8.0
25 22 8 7 5 9 26 10 25 39 151 43.2
26 6 1 1 1 9 2.6
27 3 1 2 2 8 2.3
28 9 1 5 1 4 10 9 10 6 55 16.0
29 1 1 2 2 6 1.7
30 7 5 1 1 1 1 9 2 27 7.7
31 1 1 1 3 5 11 3.2
32 2 1 1 4 1.2
33 2 3 5 1.4
Total 66 18 24 10 20 45 31 67 67 348
Table III. Types of Post-Reform Dena00rii Represented in Hoards
Reka-Devnia a Falkirkb V alenic Frondenberg d Total Approx. %
Cat.
54 3 1 1 5 2.5
55 3 2 5 2.5
56 1 1 0.5
57 23 7 18 3 51 25.5
58
59 2 2 2 3 9 4.5
60 39 4 12 4 59 29.5
61 6 3 5 1 15 7.5
62 15 4 1 20 10.0
63
64 2 2 4 2.0
65 1 4 5 2.5
66 3 2 5 2.5
67
68 4 2 7 13 6.5
69 5 1 2 8 4.0
Total 102 27 55 16 200
sive chronological stages and not the differing practices of individual mints. Minor differences in reverse types, such as the placing of the legends SALVS and ROMA across the field instead of in the exergue, are similarly chronological distinctions. There is, moreover, no clear indication of any difference in the relative proportion of aureus and denarius reverse types between finds in Italy and the western or eastern provinces.

This gold and silver coinage forms a remarkably compact group, and the portrait imagines used by its die engravers are basically the same as those used for the aes of the mint of Rome. The bust truncation of aurei and denarii dated TRP IX and TRP X (Plate I, 19-20) is very close to that of the Roman aes without SC (Plates V–VI, 177ff.); the truncation of the early undated gold and silver (Plate I, 22, 23) is close to that on the Roman aes with SC struck in 64–66 (Plate VII, 200, 205); and the truncation of the gold and silver with the praenomen IMP (Plate II, 31, 65, 66) is very similar to that of Roman aes with the praenomen IMP (Plate IX, 238, 240). None of these has anything in common with the characteristic Lugdunum truncation at any stage (Plate XIII, 419ff.). The common form of bust truncation seems to have been an external factor derived from common imagines used by all the engravers at a mint. The use of common imagines shared with the Roman aes clearly points to Rome rather than Lugdunum as the place of the gold and silver die engraving establishment. 5

There is good evidence for the existence of the mint at Rome in the senatorial office of the tresviri monetales aere argento auro fiando feriundo, which is found on inscriptions down to third century a.d., 6 and in the series of mint inscriptions from Rome. 7

Rome would certainly have been the most convenient minting place for gold and silver under Nero. The chief sources for freshly mined gold and silver were the mines in the Iberian peninsula, 8 especially those in northwest Spain which were imperial property 9 at this period. The large revenue from these imperial mines would no doubt usually be turned into precious coin to meet imperial expenditure. The principal items of expenditure would be central state administration, public works and buildings, doles, donatives, the army and provincial government. The financial arrangements, however, did not repeatedly involve the transportation of large sums of money. Each province seems to have had its own provincial treasury and only the surpluses or deficits would be transferred at the end of each accounting period. 10 Apart from the maintenance of the frontier armies, the heaviest recurrent expenses, not counterbalanced by comparable local sources of revenue, must have been those for imperial activities at Rome. These were often costly 11 and Italy alone of the provinces was exempt from direct taxation. 12 Most of the precious metal coins struck from bullion stocks must have been put into circulation at Rome as payments of this kind, even though the coins may have passed through commercial channels almost immediately to various parts of the empire to settle trade accounts for imports to the capital. 13

It is of course theoretically possible that, even though the gold and silver dies were engraved centrally, and the major part of the precious coinage was struck in Rome, some aurei and denarii may have been struck at branch mints. 14 But there is no clear evidence to support such a hypothesis. The Vichy inscription 15 mentioning a soldier of cohors XVII Lugdunensis ad monetam, attributed to the time of Claudius or Nero, can quite well refer to the aes mint which continued to function at Lugdunum under the Flavians. 16 There is no need to refer it to the continued presence of the gold and silver mint, known to be at Lugdunum in a.d. 18. 17 Nor do finds of ancient dies support the hypothesis of subordinate mints. Only three such finds of dies are known for Nero. 18 One in the Museum at Arlon, found locally, is certainly the product of an ancient forger, as it is a metal mould for casting 44 denarii at a time. The other two, both in the Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris, are obverse dies for aurei or denarii. One was "probably found in France" and the other is "said to have been found in France c. 1816," but both may very well have been used by ancient forgers. Many plated denarii are known for Nero as for all the other early emperors. 19 Most of them are in good style and some have argued that they may have been produced by official mint(s) as a measure of illicit profit for the government. 20 But whatever one's verdict on plated denarii of Claudius and earlier emperors, it is now clear that Nero's plated silver was the product of unofficial forgers. The analysis of Nero's coinages has closely defined the issues of denarii and the obverse and reverse types used in each issue. Had the plated denarii been produced under official auspices they would undoubtedly have been made in the same mint organization with the same combinations of types as the regular denarii in good silver. But whereas hybrids between issues do not occur on good denarii, they are comparatively common within the plated group, combining not only the obverse and reverse types of different issues, but sometimes even obverse and reverse types of different emperors. Whether the dies for these plated denarii were illegally appropriated from an official mint, or whether they were the work of competent private engravers, 21 there can be little doubt that the manufacture of plated denarii was the work of forgers. The places at which finds of early imperial dies have been discovered are singularly out of the way. 22 None has been found in Rome or Lyons, the two known mint cities of the early empire. Nor have any been found in other places where one would expect there to be branch mints (if such were the organization)—towns such as Trier, Arles, Amiens, London—the central location of which commended them as mint cities in the widely changed conditions of the late empire. There is nothing to show that the coins struck from these dies were made under official auspices in the localities where the dies were discovered. In only one case has it been shown that an impeccable coin was struck from one of these dies, 23 but even this die may well have fallen into the hands of forgers by appropriation from the mint after it had been used to strike official coins. And it seems most likely that the dies recovered from these scattered find spots were the property of ancient forgers.

End Notes

a
Bullettino della Commissione Archeologica Communale di Roma 56 (1930), pp. 1ff.
b
Fiorelli, Pompeianarum Antiquitalum Historia. I.3, pp. 250–51.
c
Opgravingen op het dompe in te Utrecht, Haarlem 1934, pp. 49ff.
d
NC 1912, pp. 265–312.
e
Fonds Vacquer à la Bibliothèque de la ville de Paris. The late Mlle. Fabre kindly sent me details of this find.
f
NZ vol. 34, pp. 29ff.
g
Mitteilungen C. C. Steiermark 2, 173; 3, 157; 5, 109.
h
K. Regling, "Der Schatz römischer Goldmünzen von Diarbekir (Mardin)," BlM 1930–33, pp. 353–381.
i
M. Thirion, Le lrésor de Liherchies. Aurei des Ier et IIe sièdes (Brussels 1972).
a
N. A. Mouchmov, "Le trésor numismatique de Reka-Devnia", Annuaire du Musée National Bulgare 1934 Supplément.
b
NC 1934, pp. 1–30.
c
MSS. list in British Museum.
d
ZfN 1912, pp. 189–253.
1
Sydenham, Nero, pp. 132–169.
2
Sydenham, The Coinage of Caesarea in Cappadocia (London, 1933), pp. 36ff.
3
W. Wruck, Die syrische Provinzialprägung von Augustus bis Traian, (Stuttgart, 1931), pp. 63ff.
4
D. W. Mac Dowall, "Two Roman Countermarks of a.d. 68" NC 1960, pp. 103–112.
5
My argument is not open to the sort of objection that M. Grant makes ("The Mints of Roman Gold and Silver in the Early Principate," NC 1955, p. 44) to C. H. V. Sutherland's attribution of Claudius' gold and silver to Rome— "surely we cannot argue that certain gold and silver is of Rome because of a stylistic resemblance to aes which we believe to be Roman''—for it merely points to the existence of imagines of two distinct types and identifies the type used on the aurei and denarii.
6
F. Lenormant, La monnaie dans l'antiquité III (Paris, 1878), pp. 185ff.
7
CIL VI, 42, 43, 44, 239, 791, 1145, 1607, etc.
8
Tenney Frank, An Economic Survey of Ancient Rome III (Baltimore, 1937), pp. 150ff.
9
Frank, Survey III, pp. 166ff.
10
Cf. A. H. M. Jones, "The Aerarium and the Fiscus," J RS 1950, pp. 22–29. In this discussion I use the generic term "treasury" to cover the activities of both aerarium and fiscus.
11
Nero's building operations were extensive (see Platner and Ashby, A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome (London, 1929), p. 595; Nero spent heavily on games, donatives, gifts, etc. Suetonius, Nero, 10.1; 11; 30; Tacitus, Annals 12.58.
12
Tenny Frank, An Economic History of Rome (2nd ed. Baltimore, 1927), p. 491.
13
The capital had a permanently adverse balance of trade. Cf. Frank, Survey V (1940), pp. 281–82.
14
A suggestion made by Sutherland in a review of H. R. W. Smith, Problems Historical and Numismatic in the Reign of Augustus (Berkeley, 1951) in NC 1952, p. 145. Cf. M. Grant NC 1955, pp. 53–54.
15
CIL XIII, 1499, and Mommsen, Hermes 16 (1881), p. 645.
16
BMC RE II, p. lviiif. for Vespasian's aes mint at Lugdunum.
17
Strabo 4.3.2. C 192.
18
C. C. Vermeule, Some Notes on Ancient Dies and Coining Methods (London, 1954), pp. 29–30.
19
For plated denarii of Nero see pp. 35 and 243 below.
20
L. A. Lawrence, "On Roman Plated Coins," NC 1940, p. 194, believed that we should regard plated coins as part of the governmental issues, and so apparently does Sutherland, Coinage in Roman Imperial Policy, p. 201; but Mattingly BMCRE I, p. xlivf., is doubtful about their official origin. Sydenham, "On Roman Plated Coins," NC 1940, pp. 2ooff., thought the St. Swithin's Lane hoard was the product of a forger but that plated denarii were also produced by the mint. But M. H. Crawford's article "Plated Coins— False Coins," NC 1968, pp. 55–59, argues convincingly against this, and shows that except in irregular coinages produced in periods of civil war, plated coins must have been forgeries.

Distribution of Nero's Aes

The western aes of Nero falls into two basic types. 24 The first is characterized by a small globe at the point of Nero's bust on the obverse, and a characteristic M form of bust truncation (see Plates XIII, 432; XIV, 452). The style of portraiture of this group is quite distinctive and the varieties of obverse legend and reverse types, established by an analysis of well preserved coins with the globe (see Cat. 401–633), constitute an objective basis for attribution to this group even when the globe and form of bust truncation are not visible on worn or corroded coins.

The second type has no globe and a straighter form of bust termination (see Plate II, 71, 74). The style of portraiture is again distinct, and the analysis of well preserved coins enables us to establish the distinctive forms of obverse legends and reverse types that characterize this group (see Cat. 70–335).

The distribution of these two types in the years immediately after their issue is the basic evidence for the localization of the mints at which the two types were struck. It is not however sufficient merely to list the localities at which examples of each type are said to have been found, as this can sometimes obscure the original pattern of distribution. Single coins may have been lost at any time during the period of their continued circulation; and unusual types are liable to attract attention because they are unusual, whereas the ordinary pass unnoticed. It is therefore important to distinguish the quality of different categories of evidence, and to determine the general character of circulation in an area from the recurrent statistical pattern observed at a number of localities.

The best evidence consists of finds which accurately reflect currency circulating at a known point of time, because they can be given a secure terminus ante quem . 25 But there are comparatively few commercial hoards and stratified or closed sites which meet these rigorous canons. The next best evidence consists of the accumulated finds from a thoroughly excavated site, or the accumulated deposits recovered from a well or river bed. Such coins may have been lost at any time during their continued circulation, but it is a reasonable inference that the commonest types will have been most commonly lost; and where the finds from a site are sufficiently numerous, they should provide a reasonably accurate statistical pattern of circulation.

For regions where this quality of evidence is not available, some idea of distribution may be found by noting casual finds recorded in archaeological publications or noted in local museums. The cumulative totals of such finds may be less reliable statistically, if there has been any preference in acquiring or noting specimens of new and rare varieties or in declining badly preserved specimens of common types. Finally, in the absence of other evidence, it is often possible to form an approximate estimate of circulation from the un- provenanced collections of local museums. The general character of some collections suggests quite strongly that it is largely composed of local finds even though the museum has not kept accurate records, but such evidence must be used with great care.

So that appropriate weight can be given to each category of evidence, finds in the following paragraphs have been classified as:

A—A hoard or excavation finds with terminus ante quem of a.d. 80 or before.

B—The aggregate of coins from other excavations or deposits.

C—Casual finds.

D—Unprovenanced coins probably found locally.

For localities where there is adequate evidence from finds classified A and B, finds of other categories which cannot contribute anything further to the picture of distribution have not been cited. Where it is necessary to cite casual finds, the evidence of groups of coins which have greater statistical validity has been preferred to that of single finds.

Finds of sestertii, dupondii and asses in Britain, Upper and Lower Germany, Belgica, Lugdunensis and Raetia are almost all of the "globe" type; finds from Narbonensis are predominantly of the "globe" type; finds from Spain, Noricum, Pannonia and the area east of the Rhine and north of the Danube are divided between the "globe" and the "non-globe" type; and finds from Italy are almost all of the "non-globe" type. In the following list, coins are attributed to the "globe" and "non-globe" mint on the basis of the criteria set out in this monograph. By analyzing the varieties of coins in good condition it is possible to establish those forms of obverse legend and reverse type found exclusively at the "globe" mint, those found exclusively at the "non-globe" mint and those which occur at both mints. These criteria enable us to attribute many find coins to the appropriate mint, even when globe, aegis or bust truncation may not be visible.

This section is intended merely to indicate the pattern of circulation for each locality—not to constitute an exhaustive list of finds. It would be possible to add further entries for many localities, but they could hardly affect very significantly the overall picture.

GLOBE TYPE NON-GLOBE TYPE
Sest. Dup. As Sest. Dup. As
Britannia
A Southwark hoard 26 2 9
B Richborough exc. 27 5 71 2
B Silchester exc. 28 2 9
B Wroxeter exc. 29 2 8 1 1
B Leicester exc. 30 2 9
B St. Albans exc. 31 1 2 12
B R. Thames deposit. 32 2 5 9
B R. Churn deposit 33 2 4
B R. Walbrook, London 34 1 3 8
Germania Inferior
B Nijmegen 35 9 11 13 1 1
B Neuß exc. 36 15 17 37 2 1
B Ziegeleien bei Neuß 37 1 2 1 1
GLOBE TYPE NON-GLOBE TYPE
Sest. Dup. As Sest. Dup. As
B Bonn exc. 38 2 3 3
B Vetera exc. 39 9 8 10
Germania Superior
B Mainz exc. 40 2 7
B Vindonissa exc. 41 9 22 103 1 4 10
C Marburg bei Pommern 42 2 8
Belgica
B R. Sambre deposit 43 3
B Condé-sur-Aisne 44 77 656 9 199
C Compiègne 45 13 2
C Besançon 46 15 4
C Franche Comté 47 7 2
C Héraple 48 4 2
C Sarrebourg 49 4
C Langres 50 4
Lugdunensis
A Sens hoard 51 3 1 1
A Augers en Brie 52 1 6
GLOBE TYPE NON-GLOBE TYPE
Sest. Dup. As Sest. Dup. As
B R. Mayenne 53 3 97 707 10 111
C Rouen 54 3
C Forêt de la Lande 55 6 2
D Lyons 56 2
Aquitania
A Puy de Dôme hoard 57 45 6
C Bard (Auvergne) 58 1
D Saintes 59 7 4
D Poitiers 60 17 3
Narbonensis
B Orange 61 2 1
C Vaison 62 3 2
C St. Remy 63 5
C Basses Alpes 64 4
D Vienne 65 2 3 9 4 3
D Nîmes 66 10 3 27 7 4 11
GLOBE TYPE NON-GLOBE TYPE
Sest. Dup. As Sest. Dup. As
D Toulon 67 3 3
D Valence 68 4 1
Raetia
C Augsburg 69 15 5
C Augsburg 70 1 2 5 3
C Kempten 71 2 3 6 1 4
C Mertingen 72 5
C Aislingen 73 2 1 1
C Burghöfe 74 1 4
C Bregenz 75 2
Noricum
C Virunum 76 1
C Maria Saal 77 1
C Frauenberg bei Leibnitz 78 1
C Wagna 79 1 1 4
D Enns 80 1 1 1 3 1
Pannonia
B Carnuntum 81 1 3 2 1 4
B Carnuntum 82 2 1 1
GLOBE TYPE NON-GLOBE TYPE
Sest. Dup. As Sest. Dup. As
C Celje 83 1 1
C Zagreb 84 4 1 2 4 2 4
C Ptuj 85 2 1 1 1
Tarraconensis
C Tarragona 86 1
C Lezuza 87 1
C Zaragoza 88 3 2 2 1
C Menorca 89 1
C Segorbe 90 1
C San Sebastian Prov. 91 1 1 1 1
C Valencia 92 2 2
C Pollensa 93 1
D Tarragona 94 3 3 6 1 3
D Madrid 95 96 47 55 89 40 91
Lusitania
B Merida 96 1 2
C Merida 97 1
D Lisbon 98 8 4 4 5 1 9
GLOBE TYPE NON-GLOBE TYPE
Sest. Dup. As Sest. Dup. As
D Porto 99 2 1 7
D Porto 100 1 2 1 11
Germania (East of Rhine and North of Danube)
B Hofheim 101 1 2 1
B Saalburg 102 1 2
C Rheinbrohl 103 1 1
C Wiesbaden 104 2 5 6 1
C Heddernheim 105 1 4 3
C Huffingen 106 2 8
C Waldkirch 107 1 1
B Ems 108 2
C Kasteli Zugmantel 109 1 1
B Kasteli Obernburg 110 1 2
C Riegel 111 4 1
Italia
A N. Italian hoard 112 5
A Pozzarello hoard 113 3 17 9 74
GLOBE TYPE NON-GLOBE TYPE
Sest. Dup. As Sest. Dup. As
A Pompeii 114 3 14 6 46
A Pompeii 115 3 178
A Pompeii 116 68 2
B Tiber 117 2 11 21 3 218
B Ostia 118 6
B Minturnae 119 1 1 1
C Rome 120 1 23
B Aquileia 121 7 7 10 5 4 20
B Liri 122 1 43 3 20

End Notes

21
Crawford, "Plated Coins," pp. 56–57, shows that a plated Republican denarius in Hannover was struck from dies, mechanically copied from a pure silver coin.
22
Vermeule, Ancient Dies, pp. 29–30.
23
RN 1946, "Procès Verbaux," pp. ii–viii, though of course others too may have been "official" dies.
24
BMCRE I, p. clxiiif.
25
Cf. J. G. Milne, "The Interpretation of Coin-finds" Finds of Greek Coins in the British Isles (London, 1948), pp. 15–16; cf. also Greek and Roman Coins and the Study of History (London, 1939), pp. 95–96.
26
NC 1903, pp. 99–102.
27
Totals from Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of A ntiquaries of London , Nos. 6, 7, 10 and 16.
28
Now in Reading Museum.
29
Now in Rowley's House Museum, Shrewsbury.
30
Rep ResCommSocAntLond, no. 15.
31
Rep ResCommSocAntLond, no. 11.
32
NC 1841–42, pp. 147–168. The figures are for those coins now in the British Museum.
33
NC 1864, pp. 216–23.
34
Ant J 1962, pp. 40–41.
35
Local finds in Rijksmuseum G. M. Kam, Nijmegen.
36
BonnerJb 1904, pp. 263–67, and now republished by H. Chantraine in Novaesium III Die antiken Fundmünzen der Ausgrabungen in Neuss (Berlin, 1968).
37
Bon ner Jb 1904, p. 450.
38
Information from Wilhelmina Hagen.
39
Information from Wilhelmina Hagen.
40
MainzerZ 1911, pp. 71–72; 1912, p. 84; 1913–14, p. 66; 1918, p. 25; 1929, pp. 66f.
41
C. M. Kraay, Die Münzfunde von Vindonissa (Basel, 1962).
42
Bonner Jb 1897, pp. 89–91.
43
RBN 1956, pp. 55–80.
44
RN 1969, pp. 76–130.
45
St. Germain-en-Laye Musée.
46
Musée de Besançon. I am indebted to Lucien Lerat and Yves Jeannin for giving me detailed information about the coins in the Besançon Museum and their provenances.
47
Musée de Besançon.
48
J ahrbuch der Gesellschaft für lothringische Geschichte 1894, p. 322.
49
J bGeslothGesch 1899, p. 326.
50
Musée de Besançon.
51
Bulletin de la Société Archéologique de Sens 21 (1905), pp. 235–49.
52
NC 1967, pp. 43–46.
53
Bulletin de la Société d'Archéologie, Sciences, Arts et Belles-lettres de la Mayenne, 1865, pp. 9ff, 32–36. Through the kindness of M. Bisson I have been allowed to study the unpublished part of this large deposit.
54
Musée Départmental, Rouen.
55
Musée Départmental, Rouen.
56
Seen by M. Grant in trade, cf. NC 1955, pp. 21–37.
57
Cf. P. F. Fournier "Les travaux de 1956 au sommet du Puy de Dôme," Bulletin Historique et Scientifique de l'Auvergne 1956, pp. 196–201. Through the kindness of the late Mlle Fabre of the Bibliothèque Nationale, I have been permitted to examine this hoard, which has now been published by J. B. Giard, RN 1964, pp. 151–57.
58
P. F. Fournier, Bulletin Historique et Scientifique de l'Auvergne 1939, p. 3.
59
Hôtel de Ville, Saintes.
60
Le Musée, Poitiers.
61
Orange Musée from excavations in the theatre.
62
J. Sautel, Vaison dans l'antiquite II (Avignon, 1926), pp. 78–79.
63
St. Remy-en-Provence Musée from Glanum, and H. Rolland, Fouilles de Glanum.Gallia Suppl. 1 (Paris, 1946), p. 23.
64
Musée des Antiquités Nationale, St. Germain-en-Laye.
65
Vienne Musée.
66
Formerly in Maison Carrée, Nîmes.
67
Seen by M. Grant in trade, Toulon.
68
La Bibliothèque, Valence.
69
Münzkabinett, Munich.
70
Die Fundmünzen der Römischen Zeit in Deutschland 1962 (FMRD) I.7. Schwaben 7001.
71
FMRD I.7. Schwaben 7182.
72
H.-J. Kellner, Die römischen Fundmünzen auf dem nördlichen Teil von Rätien.
73
FMRD I.7. Schwaben 7044.
74
FMRD I.7. Schwaben 7069.
75
Vorarlberger Landesmuseum, Bregenz.
76
Landesmuseum für Kärnten, Klagenfurt.
77
Fundberichte aus Österreich II, p. 296.
78
F. Pichler, Repertorium der steierischen Münzkunde II (Graz, 1867), p. 12.
79
Pichler, Repertorium II, pp. 12, 14–15.
80
Museum Lauriacum, Enns.
81
Museum Carnuntinum, Bad Deutsch Altenberg.
82
Sammlung Ludwigsdorff.
83
Pichler, Repertorium II, pp. 13–14.
84
Šime Ljubić, Popis Arkeologičkoga Odjela Nar. Zem. Muzeja u Zagrebu, pp. 132ff.
85
Pichler, Repertorium II, pp. 12–15.
86
1925/30 excavations in Forum, now in Museo Arqueológico, Tarragona.
87
Bolletino Arqueológico del Sudeste Español 2 (1945), p. 204.
88
Museo Arqueológico, Zaragoza.
89
Felipe Mateu y Llopis, "Hallazgos Monetarios XII," No. 752, NumHisp 1955, pp. 130–31.
90
Mateu y Llopis, "Hallazgos Monetarios XII," No. 794, NumHisp 1955, p. 137.
91
Private coll., Santander.
92
Private coll., Santander.
93
Mateu y Llopis, "Hallazgos Monetarios VII," No. 600, NumHisp 1952, pp. 253–54.
94
Museo Arqueológico Provincial, Tarragona.
95
Museo Arqueológico Nacional, Madrid.
96
Museo Arqueológico, Merida.
97
Now in Museo Arqueológico, Cordoba.
98
Casa da Moeda, Lisbon.
99
Museu Nacional de Soares dos Reis, Porto.
100
Private coll., Porto.
101
Annalen des Vereins für Nassauische A Itertumskunde 34 (1904), p. 27.
102
L. Jacoby, Das Römerkastell Saalburg bei Homburg, pp. 365ff.
103
Information from Wilhelmina Hagen.
104
AnnVerNassauAltertumskunde 26 (1896) and 37 (1907), pp. 4ff.
105
Mitteilungen über römische Funde in Heddernheim 3 (Frankfurt am Main, 1900), pp. 10–61 and 4 (1907), p. 54.
106
. Revellio, "Das Kasteli Hüfingen," Der Obergermanisch-Rätische Limes 55 (Berlin/Leipzig, 1937), pp. 33–34.
107
K. Bissinger, Funde römischer Münzen im Großherzogtum Baden 1 (Donaueschingen, 1887), p. 14, 35.
108
R. Bodewig, "Das Kasteli Ems," Der Obergermanisch-Rätische Limes 36 (1937), p. 22.
109
L. Jacoby, "Das Kasteli Zugmantel," Der Obergermanisch-Rätische Limes 32 (Heidelberg, 1909).
110
A. D. Conrady, "Das Kasteli Obernburg." Der Obergermanisch-Rätische Limes 18 (Heidelberg, 1903).
111
Bissinger, Baden, pp. 15–16 and (2nd ed. Karlsruhe, 1906), 98, p. 9.
112
Seen in trade by the author.
113
Mélanges d'archéologie et d'histoire 1964, pp. 51–90.

Sources of Metals and Minerals

Nero's aes consisted of asses, semisses and quadrantes in copper, and of sestertii and dupondii in orichalcum, with a limited issue of asses, semisses and quadrantes also in orichalcum. Orichalcum was originally a natural alloy, but by the middle of the first century a.d. the Romans made the alloy artificially by heating copper in a bed of calamine. The raw materials needed for the aes coinages were thus ordinary copper, copper suitable for processing into orichalcum, and calamine needed for the processing.

The principal sources for copper in the middle of the first century a.d. were the imperial mines in Spain and Cyprus. 123 In Spain the mines of Sextus Marius had been confiscated by Tiberius;124 and the Hadrianic letter to Ulpius Aelianus 125 read in conjunction with the Lex Metalli Vipascensis 126 shows clearly that the copper, silver and iron mines in established mining districts of Spain were state owned at that period; and its reference to a forma revised by Hadrian shows that the original of this lex must have been of earlier date. In Cyprus the mines seem to have been nationalized when the tribune Clodius annexed the island in 58 b.c.; 127 Augustus gave Herod a concession but retained a half interest for the Roman government; 128 and the mines near Soli were still under state ownership when Galen visited them in the second century a.d. 129

Spanish copper, called "Marianum" or "Cordubense," was especially important for the coinage, as it readily absorbed calamine and reproduced the excellence of orichalcum in making sestertii and dupondii. 130 The extensive copper workings in Cyprus were apparently less highly valued once better copper (and orichalcum) had been found in other countries, but Pliny explicitly tells us that Cypriot copper was used for the production of asses. 131

There do not seem to have been any other important copper workings in the Roman Empire at this period. The copper from Livia's mine in Gaul had enjoyed a high reputation but the supply soon gave out; 132 Sallustius' copper from Haute-Savoie was highly esteemed "next to orichalcum," but supplies only lasted for a short time; 133 and although there were also Roman copper mines near Lyons the evidence for their working is of third century date. 134 Southeast Britain had used imported copper at the time of Caesar's invasion, 135 and although copper was worked further north during the Roman occupation at Plynlimmon, the Gt. Ormes Head, Anglesy, Caernarvon and in the Dee Valley, 136 these forward areas were not under secure Roman control during Nero's principate and can hardly have been sources for the copper required by the mint. Workings of copper in Upper and Lower Germany were neither profitable nor extensive during the first century. There was prospecting of early imperial date in the poor impregnations of azurite and malachite at Blauberg in the Saar and at Kerdel; 137 but the copper workings in the ancient mines at the mouth of the Ems 138 lay beyond Roman territory under Nero. Illyria provides hardly any evidence of Roman mining and Dacia was outside Roman control at this period. There were extensive ancient copper workings at Majdanpek in the mountains of Moesia, but Davies has shown that the mines were abandoned when the Romans consolidated the Danube bank. 139

The principal sources of calamine, the second mineral required in the production of orichalcum, 140 are also mentioned by Pliny. It came from overseas, was formerly also found in Campania and now in the territory of Bergamo. "It is also reported to have been recently discovered in the province of Germany," 141 a reference to the important mine at Stollberg which subsequently became the principal center of bronze production in the Empire. 142 These deposits were discovered some time between a.d. 57 and 77. 143

End Notes

114
Pompeii Antiquarium.
115
RIN 1897, p. 272.
116
From a group of coins in the Museo Nazionale, Naples.
117
Now in Muzeo Nazionale delle Terme, Rome.
118
Ostia Museum.
119
J. Johnson, Excavations at Minturnae 1 (Philadelphia, 1935), p. 99.
120
Museo Capitolino, Rome, believed to have been found in the city.
121
Museo Archeologico, Aquileia.
122
NC 1970, pp. 96–97 and NC 1974, pp. 42–52.
123
O. Davies, Roman Mines in Europe (Oxford, 1935), p. 60; and R. J. Forbes, Metallurgy in Antiquity (Leiden, 1950), pp. 272 ff. The ancients do not generally seem to have realized the metallic qualities of zinc, and apparently regarded the process as one which purified and strengthened the metal: cf. Davies Mines, Isidore, Etym. 16. 20.3. A detailed explanation of the manufacture of orichalcum in Roman times is given in Earle R. Caley, Orichalcum and Related Ancient Alloys, ANSNNM 151 (New York, 1964), pp. 92ff.
124
Davies, Mines, pp. 94 ff.
125
Tacitus, Annals vi, 19.
126
C. G. Bruns, Fontes iuris romani antiqui (7th rev. ed. Tübingen, 1909), pp. 289–93. See also discussion of these documents in Frank, Survey III, pp. 167–74.
127
Dio 38.30.5.
128
Josephus, Antiquities 16.5.5.
129
Galen 9.214.
130
Pliny, NH 34.1.2: "Summa gloria nunc in Marianum conversa, quod et Cordubense dicitur. Hoc a Liviano cadmeam maxime sorbet et aurichalci bonitatem imitatur in sestertiis dupondiariisque."
131
Pliny, NH 34.2: "Cyprio suo assibus contentis."
132
Pliny, NH 34.1.
133
Pliny, NH 34.1.
134
CIL XIII, 2901.
135
Caesar, BellGall v.12.4.
136
Davies, Mines, pp. 155ff.
137
Davies, Mines, pp. 177–78; the inscription CIL XIII, 4238 was found at Blauberg.
138
Davies, Mines, pp. 179f.
139
Davies, Mines, pp. 218ff.
140
Cf. note 131 above.
141
Pliny, NH 34.2.2.
142
Willers, "Neue Untersuchungen über die römische Bronze-Industrie von Capua und von Niedergermanien," Jahrbuch des provinzialen Museums zu Hannover 1906–7, p. 64.
143
Willers dates the discovery between a.d. 57, when Pliny seems to have been in Upper Germany, and a.d. 74.

The Non-Globe Aes Mint

Aes of the non-globe type circulated almost exclusively in Italy. There is no reason to doubt that the mint which produced this coinage was in fact the mint of Rome, for which we have repeated authorities in the senatorial office of the tresviri monetales, which continues to be found on inscriptions down to the third century a.d., 144 and in the series of mint inscriptions from Rome. 145 The city was the obvious center for supplying coinage to Italy, and the vast urban population (estimated at a million at this period 146 ) must have created a major demand for small change. In so far as the mint used freshly mined metal, there is no reason to doubt Pliny's statement that it used copper from Cyprus for its asses, and copper from Corduba as the basic constituent for the orichalcum of its sestertii and dupondii, 147 the alloy itself being made by heating the copper in a bed of calamine which presumably came from the Bergamo deposits. 148

The Globe Aes Mint

Aes of the globe type enjoyed an almost exclusive circulation in Gaul, Britain, the Rhine and Vindelicia south of the Danube, and must have been struck in one of these western provinces. The use of an important second mint in the west was fairly general imperial practice during the first century. Vespasian continued to use the same mint with the same globe and characteristic bust truncation for a fairly large group of aes which circulated primarily in the same western provinces. 149

Sydenham 150 and Laffranchi 151 have suggested that "westernstyle" groups can be distinguished among the Agrippa asses and Claudius' aes, although the detailed evidence of site finds has not yet been analyzed to settle finally whether or not their criteria are sound. 152 This mint seems to have been the successor to the mint at Lugdunum which issued the extensive Altar series up to the early years of Tiberius,153 a series which constituted the main currency of the Rhine frontier at the time, and again struck semisses of the Altar type under Claudius.154Lyons was in fact an eminently suitable place for a western aes mint, in a perfectly safe area yet conveniently situated to supply the small change needed by the frontier armies of the Rhine, Britain and Upper Danube, and equally accessible to the principal sources of copper.

Under Nero freshly mined copper for the globe type sestertii and dupondii in orichalcum would almost certainly come from Corduba; and from Spain again, or possibly from Cyprus, would come the freshly mined copper for the asses and semisses. The calamine needed to manufacture the copper into orichalcum may have come from Bergamo, but it is far more likely that it came from the newly discovered mines at Stollberg. Although Spain was an extremely important source for the freshly mined copper used for Nero's western aes, Nero's mint was certainly not situated there. We have seen above that finds of Nero's aes are not common in Spain and the Iberian peninsula was not exclusively or even predominantly provided with aes of Nero's globe type. For similar reasons the Danubian provinces also can be excluded, and neither Britain nor Africa had the central position required. Germany remains a possibility, but was not conveniently placed between the sources of freshly mined copper and some of the areas ultimately supplied, notably Raetia, West Gaul and the Rhone valley. Gaul on the other hand would have enjoyed the great advantage of centrality and Lyons, its capital, enjoyed that advantage par excellence. Lyons, as Strabo tells us, "commands Gaul like an acropolis." 155 It lies at the center of the river communications of the country and had been made the center of Agrippa's road system. It was conveniently near the Rhine-Danube reentrant and all the normal routes from South Spain to the Rhine, North and West Gaul, Britain and Raetia would part ways here. 156

Lyons, moreover, had a long tradition as a mint city. Antony had struck quinarii there as governor in 42/41 b.c., and signed them with the name of the town. 157 We have Strabo's explicit statement for the existence there of a mint for gold and silver under Tiberius.158 It was the mint which produced the extensive Altar series under Augustus and Tiberius and the commemorative Altar semisses struck under Claudius. 159 Its position as a mint city is further attested by several inscriptions from the immediate environs, 160 and by the presence of an urban cohort designated "ad monetam." 161 Under Tiberius, no doubt, the troops must have played an important part in the security arrangements for the minting of gold and silver at Lyons; but even after the striking of coinage in the precious metals was transferred to Rome, 162 Lyons remained the only city in the provinces, apart from Carthage, to be garrisoned by an urban cohort. Its presence was first mentioned by Tacitus in a.d. 21 when Acilius Aviola used it to check the revolt of the Andecavi. 163 Cohort XVIII formed the garrison in 69 164 and I Flavia Urbana took its place by 73. 165 This Lugdunum cohort was expressly called COH XVII LVGDVNENSIS AD MONETAM in the dedication to Lucius Fufius at Equestre, an inscription which cannot be dated before the time of Claudius because the cohort is XVII nor very much later because the man had no cognomen. 166 There is therefore good reason for attributing the globe type aes of the mid-first century to Lyons, and for regarding it as a successor to the important western aes coinage of the Altar series. 167

End Notes

144
F. Lenormant, La monnaie III, pp. 185 ff.
145
CIL VI, 42, 43, 44, 239, 791, 1145, 1607 etc.
146
Frank, Survey V, p. 140.
147
Pliny, NH 34.1.2.
148
In "The Quality of Nero's Orichalchum,'' SM 1966, pp. 101-105, I have commented on the lower percentage of zinc in several of Nero's orichalcum coins of the non-globe mint, and suggested that many of the coins at Rome were struck from secondary alloy derived from remelted old coins.
149
See BMC RE II, pp. lviii ff.
150
Sydenham, Nero, pp. 30–31 and "The Mint of Lugdunum," NC 1917, pp. 82–83.
151
L. Laffranchi, "La monetazione imperatoria e senatoria di Claudio 1º durante il Quadriennio 41–44 d.º Cr.º," RIN 1949, pp. 41–48, though Laffranchi there suggests that the western European mint may be in Spain.
152
S. Jameson, "The Date of the Asses of M. Agrippa," NC 1966, pp. 95–124, on the other hand, argues that all three groups of Agrippa asses that she distinguishes were struck in Rome, but she does not support her argument with find evidence. The absence of countermarks from her group (a), and the presence of countermarks localized in the western provinces on groups (b) and (c) suggests to me that these latter two groups may be the product of a western mint.
153
RIC, p. 91, nos. 359–371.
154
RIC, p. 130, nos. 70–71.
155
Strabo iv.6.11. Cf. Ammianus Marcellinus xv.11.17.
156
M. P. Charlesworth, Trade-routes and Commerce of the Roman Empire (2nd ed. Cambridge, 1926), pp. 183ff. and 192ff. H. R. W. Smith's objections in Problems Historical and Numismatic of the Reign of Augustus (Berkeley, 1951), pp. 161-174, it should be noted, were directed against the view that Lugdunum was the sole gold and silver mint in the early empire; he did not attempt to deny that Lugdunum was a mint, though he strove to weaken Strabo's apparently straightforward statement of contemporary fact. He emphasized the difficulties in navigating the Rhone, but the numerous inscriptions of the companies of navigators of the Rhone and Arar (in CIL XIII) greatly undermine the force of this point as do the extensive Roman quays along the river at Lyons (O. Brogan, Roman Gaul [London, 1953], p. 103) and the extensive quays of more modern date at places like Avignon. In any case Agrippa's road system followed the line of the main river routes, and there were good roads up the Rhone valley.
157
Sydenham, "Lugdunum," NC 1917, p. 55.
158
Strabo 4.3.2.
159
Sydenham, NC 1917, p. 86.
160
CIL XIII, 1499, 1810, 1820
161
CIL XIII, 1499.
162
See BMCRE I Intro., and Sutherland Coinage in Roman Imperial Policy. For my objections to M. F. Grant's point of view in NC 1955, pp. 39–54 see p. 12 above.
163
Tacitus, Annals iii.41.
164
Tacitus, Histories i.64.
165
CIL XII, 2601.
166
See Mommsen in Hermes 16 (1881), p. 645, n. 4.
167
I have compared the relative proportion of altar to moneyers' and imperial aes under Augustus/Tiberius and of globe to non-globe aes under Nero in finds from Gaul and Italy in the appendix to my article "A Group of Early Imperial Aes from Augers-en-Brie," NC 1967, pp. 43–47.

3. GOLD AND SILVER

Dated Issues a.d. 54–64

For the first ten years of Nero's principate the gold and silver struck at Rome bore tribunician dates TRP to TRP X, which clearly differentiated successive issues. During the first tribunician year to December 55 three aureus and denarius types were issued—one commemorating the deification of Claudius, the second with heads of Nero and Agrippina facing (Plate I, 2) and the third with jugate busts of Nero and Agrippina (Plate I, 3).

In TRP II a new obverse type was introduced (Plate 1, 4) which remained basically unchanged throughout the rest of the dated gold and silver coinage. Its legend was NERO CAESAR AVG IMP, and Nero's head was shown facing right with the hair drawn down over his forehead. During the course of these dated issues slightly older portraits of Nero were gradually substituted, and in the issue of the ninth tribunician year Nero's hair was shown for the first time raised in tiers above his forehead, the "in gradus formata" style described by Suetonius. 1 The reverse type of both the aurei and the denarii dated TRP II was EX SC within an oak wreath, the corona civica, and an outside legend PONTIF MAX TRP II PP completed Nero's titles from the obverse. In this year there was a rare issue of gold quinarii with the usual quinarius reverse type of Victoria. The aurei and denarii dated TRP III, III and V retained the same obverse and reverse types and merely altered the tribunician year in the reverse legend. All coins dated TRP VI included in their reverse legend COS IIII Nero's fourth consulship which began January 1, 60. 2

In the issues dated TRP VII three new reverse types of Virtus, Ceres and Roma (Plate 1, 11, 12, 13) were introduced to replace that of the Corona Civica. Coins of the new Virtus and Ceres types seem to be far commoner than either the old Corona Civica or the new Roma type in the issues of this year. 3 Indeed it is only when examples of the Corona Civica type and Roma type are taken together that their numbers equal those of either the Virtus or of the Ceres type dated TRP VII. It is interesting to note that the reverse legend of the Corona Civica type reads counterclockwise and so did that of the new Roma type, whereas the reverse legends of the Virtus and Ceres types read clockwise. This might possibly suggest that the new Virtus and Ceres types were introduced at the beginning of the year and struck alongside the Corona Civica types, and that the Roma type was introduced to replace the Corona Civica type later in the year. In the TRP VIII issue the three types of Virtus, Roma and Ceres were struck in both gold and silver; in the TRP VIIII issue all three types were again struck in gold, but Virtus and Roma alone in silver; in the TRP X issue only two types, Virtus and Roma, were struck, in both gold and silver. 4

Cat. 1–21, 35–53. Plate I.

End Notes

1
Suetonius, Nero 51.
2
Degrassi, I fasti, p. 16.

Post-Reform Undated Issues

The undated gold and silver is a coinage struck on a reduced weight standard, on which the portraits are all later than on the dated series. The legends NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS and NERO CAESAR, both of which lack the praenomen IMP, must belong to the period before mid-a.d. 66. No significant chronological distinction can however be drawn between these two forms. Except on plated denarii, NERO CAESAR was merely used with the AVGVSTVS GERMAN ICVS type on which the reverse legend completed the titulature from the obverse. After Nero assumed the praenomen IMP in mid-66 there were two forms of obverse legend on the gold and silver: IMP NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS and IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PP. The reverse types in the issue with IMP NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS were taken directly from, and must therefore have directly followed, the preceding issue with NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS; but on denarii with IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PP in addition to the types that had been used with NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS and IMP NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS there were three new reverse types peculiar to the issue: the anepigraphic type of an eagle between two standards; and fresh varieties of the Roma and Salus types with the legends in the reverse field. IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PP must thus have been the latest form of reverse legend on Nero's gold and silver.

Issue 1 of the undated gold and silver coinage on the reformed standard had the obverse legends NERO CAESAR, and NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS. In gold there were eight distinct reverse types: Augustus Germanicus; AugustusAugusta; Jupiter Custos; seated Roma; Salus; the Temple of Vesta; the Temple of Janus; and Concordia Augusta.

The first six of these types were regularly struck in silver too during this issue; but while the types of Janus temple and of Concordia Augusta are known in silver, they are extremely rare, are not represented in hoards, and were certainly not substantive denarius types. In this we seem to have evidence of an initial production of gold in two reverse types (accompanied by a token emission of silver) continuing the "two reverse type" pattern of the gold in TRP X, before the productive capacity was expanded. Among the other aurei and denarii with this obverse legend, the reverse types of Jupiter Custos and Salus are by far the commonest. These two subsequently became the sole substantive reverse types in issues 2 and 3 a, and it seems fairly certain that they continued to be struck in Issue 1, after the other reverse types were discontinued. We can therefore distinguish three phases within the issue:

1a. Janus and Concordia types, with substantive issues of aurei (but accompanied by a token issue of denarii).

1b. The six reverse types of Augustus Germanicus, AugustusAugusta, Jupiter Custos, Roma, Salus and Vesta with substantive issues in both gold and silver.

1c. The continuing issue of Jupiter Custos and Salus types in both gold and silver.

Cat. 22–29, 54–61, PLATES I–II.

Issue 2 had the obverse legend IMP NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS. Its aurei were struck in two reverse types, Jupiter Custos and Salus, both of which were taken over directly from the preceding issue. Besides these two types of Jupiter Custos and Salus, the denarii also used the seated Roma type from the preceding issue, but it is extremely rare and cannot have been struck in any numbers.

Cat. 30, 31, 62–64. Plate II.

Issue 3 had the obverse legend IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PP. The aurei with this obverse legend continued to use the types of Jupiter Custos and Salus unchanged from the previous two issues. The denarii followed the aurei in using these two types, but they also had three further types which were struck solely in silver: a new anepigraphic type of an eagle between two standards and modified forms of both Salus and Roma types, now with their legends across the reverse field and not in the exergue. We can therefore distinguish two stages:

3a. Aurei and denarii with the reverse types of Jupiter Custos and Salus continued without change from Issues 1 and 2.

Cat. 32, 33, 65, 66. Plate II.

3b. Denarii alone in two substantive types of Salus with its legend across the field rather than in the exergue and of the new eagle and standards.

Cat. 67–69. Plate II.

Throughout Nero's reign the issues of gold and silver ran closely parallel to each other; but a number of minor discrepancies between them clearly suggests that the denarii were in fact struck immediately after the similar aurei of each issue. It has been noted that in the dated group the Ceres type, which was abandoned during the issue dated TRP VIIII, is found on the aurei of that year but not on the denarii. Similarly in the undated series both Janus temple and Concordia Augusta types are comparatively common on the gold of the first issue, but on the silver the Janus temple type is not found and the Concordia Augusta is extremely rare. In the later issues with IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PP, the fresh forms of reverse type were introduced during the issue of the denarii, and have left no trace on the aurei.

End Notes

3
The relative proportion of the aureus types in TRP VII can be seen in the numbers represented in the large hoard from Pudukota (NC 1898, pp. 304–20); in other hoards which contain aurei of Nero TRP VII from Pompeii 1812 (Pompeianarum Antiquitatum Historia I.3 [Naples, 1860], pp. 250–51); Utrecht (Opgravingen op het dompe in te Utrecht 1934, pp. 49ff.); Pontalbon (SNR 1900, p. 164); Zirkowitz (Mitteilungen CC Steiermark 2, 173; 3, 157; 5, 109); and Vienna (Jahrbuch für Altertumskunde 1909, pp. 90–95; in the collections of the BM, Oxford, Glasgow, Paris, Milan and Turin; and in the coins from Sale catalogues represented in the BM collection of photographs.
Pudukota Other Hds. Coll. Sale Photos
Cat. 10 (RIC 25) 9 4 6
11 (RIC 26) 13 2 6 16
12 (RIC 27) 12 4 5 17
13 (RIC 28) 2 1 4 6
4
For a list of these varieties under Nero see the catalogue below.

Plated Denarii

It is important to distinguish from the main series a group of unofficial plated denarii, 5 as the inclusion of some of these in older catalogues has tended to obscure the pattern of the silver issues. These plated forgeries are known in both the dated and the undated series. The obverse and reverse types were almost always those used for the regular denarii. Their dies were often in quite good style and may sometimes have been official dies illegally appropriated from the mint; but the forgers did not hesitate to use obverse and reverse dies in combinations that were quite unknown on the regular coinage. One plated denarius muled an obverse of Nero with the common PONTIF MAXIM reverse type of Tiberius. The obverse legend NERO CAESAR, confined on regular denarii to the reverse type of Augustus Germanicus which completed the legend from the obverse, was used on plated denarii with several other reverse types of the undated series. On regular coins IMP NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS was only found on Salus denarii with the reverse legend SALVS in the exergue, but on a plated specimen it was muled with a die that had SALVS across the reverse field. Regular denarii dated TRP VI included Nero's fourth consulship in their reverse PONTIF MAX TRP VI COS IIII PP, but plated denarii had PONTIF MAX VI PP alone, omitting all reference to Nero's consulship as the issue TRP II to TRP V had done. 6

End Notes

5
For a fuller discussion of Nero's plated denarii see Chapter 2 and its references.
6
The varieties of plated denarii bearing Nero's titulature are listed on p. 243.

4. Aes WITHOUT SC

The Absence of SC

The aes of Nero without SC has long been a puzzle. Recent research has thrown considerable doubt on the older view that down to the time of Gallienus the Roman Imperial coinage was controlled by a dyarchy of Senate and Emperor, and that SC and its absence denoted the product of a Senatorial and Imperial mint respectively. 1 It has become increasingly plain that the distinction was rather one of form than of final intent. 2 Nonetheless SC was given a prominent place on the aes coinage of the Julio-Claudian period and Nero was the first emperor to omit it from any considerable number of his bronze and copper coins, an omission which is the more remarkable in view of the way he introduced a special senatorial reference EXSC on the gold and silver at the beginning of his principate. 3

A careful examination and analysis of the coins which seem to lack SC enables us to define more closely the range and scope of the issues which genuinely omitted it. When worn and tooled examples are excluded, it is clear that the aes is invariably the product of the mint of Rome, and falls into two compact chronological groups. The first consists of copper asses, semisses and quadrantes. The second, slightly later than the first, consists of orichalcum sestertii, dupondii, asses and quadrantes. But each of these denominations, both in copper and orichalcum, is subsequently struck by Nero with the traditional SC on the reverse.

Copper Asses Without SC

The earliest group consists of asses in copper without SC of the Apollo and Genius reverse types. All the copper asses of these types at the mint of Rome were struck without SC:

Cat. 242

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP Head bare r.

Rev.: Nero laureate in flowing robes of Apollo Citharoedus walking r., l. holding lyre, r. playing it. No legend or SC.

Paris 11.62 gm. A301 P301

Plate IX

Cat. 243

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP Head bare r.

Rev.: As 242.

Walters 4 11.39 gm. A302 P302
Signorelli 1180 A303 P302
Imhoof Blumer 624 A304 P303

Cat. 244

Obv.: As 221 but head bare l.

Rev.: As 243.

Oxford 11.42 gm. A305 P304
BM 238 5 12.59 gm. A306 P304

Cat. 245

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP Head bare r.

Rev.: As 242.

Rome, Terme 6 12.00 gm. A307 P305
Glasgow 73 7 10.46 gm. A307 P305
Santamaria, 1924 A307 P305

Cat. 246

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMANIC Head bare r.

Rev.: As 242 but with legend PONTIF MAX TRP IMP PP

Munich A308 P306
Vatican 10.50 gm. A309 P307
Vatican 10.80 gm. A310 P308
Paris 11.12 gm. A311 P308
Oxford 10.66 gm. A312 P309
Mazzini 8 10.80 gm.
Newdigate
Tiber find 9
Tiber find
BM 235 10 11.80 gm. A313 P310
Walters 11.53 gm. A314 P311
Prince W I, 193 A315 P312
Vierordt 874 A316 P313

Plate IX

Cat. 247

Obv.: As 246 but head bare l.

Rev.: As 246.

Paris 11.67 gm. A317 P314
Copenhagen 13.30 gm. A317 P314
Florence 10.40 gm. A318 P315
Oxford 11.27 gm. A319 P316
Mac Dowall 11 8.77 gm. A319 P317
Weber 1058 A319 P318
Prince W. II, 588 A320 P332

Cat. 248

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMAN Head bare r.

Rev.: As 246.

Oxford 12.25 gm. A321 P319
Tiber find
Tiber find

Cat. 249

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMA

Head bare r.

Rev.: As 246.

Munich A322 P320
Mainz A323 P321
Copenhagen 12.60 gm. A324 P320
Sydenham 12 A325 P322
Levis 386 A325 P322

Cat. 250

Obv.: As 249 but head bare l.

Rev.: As 246.

BM 236 13 11.99 gm. A326 P323
Paris 11.88 gm. A327 P324

Plate IX

Cat. 251

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP Head bare l.

Rev.: GENIO AVGVSTI

Genius standing l. by lighted altar, holding patera and cornucopiae.

Mazzini 14 10.60 gm.

Cat. 252

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP Head bare r.

Rev.: As 251.

Rome, Terme 12.02 gm. A328 P325
Vienna 11.00 gm. A328 P326
Mainz A329 P327
Glasgow 72 15 10.87 gm. A330 P328
Oxford 10.50 gm. A331 P329
Rome, Capitol 16

Cat. 253

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP P Head bare r.

Rev.: As 251.

Madrid A334 P332

Cat. 254

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP Head bare r.

Rev.: As 246.

BM 234 14.97 gm. A332 P330

Cat. 255

Obv.: As 254.

Rev.: As 251.

Rome, Terme 17 11.75 gm. A333 P331

Plate IX

Mattingly and Sydenham described the rare coins with the anepigraphic reverse type of Apollo as dupondii with an As type, 18 but they are undoubtedly copper asses. Specimens which are not patinated have the normal red color of copper, and spectrographic analysis has confirmed this for the British Museum example. (Nero's dupondii at both Rome and Lugdunum were always struck in orichalcum). The weights of the anepigraphic asses range from 11.42 to 12.59 gm., which is well below that of the dupondii without SC but very close to that of the other copper asses without SC.

The Apollo and Genius copper asses without SC are thoroughly Roman in style and undoubtedly circulated in the neighborhood of Rome. One Genius As was found in excavations at Rome; four Apollo asses have been found in the Tiber; and a fifth came from the city of Rome. 19 Information about coin finds in the western provinces is generally far more complete than for Italy, but has not yet yielded a single example. 20

The issue of these copper asses was not especially small. I have found 34 obverse dies used in conjunction with five reverse dies of the anepigraphic Apollo type, 8 of the GENIO AVGVSTI, and 19 of the Apollo PONTIF MAX TRP IMP PP type. There are very few die links and none which connects different forms of obverse legend or different reverse types; pieces from identical dies are comparatively unusual; and there are almost as many obverse as reverse dies.

The evidence of portraiture shows conclusively that the copper asses without SC were struck before the ordinary copper asses of the mint of Rome. When Nero's head is shown in right profile on the copper asses without SC, 21 the hair is always "in gradus formata." 22 It is distinctly raised from his forehead and all the curls fringing the forehead as far back as the ear are shown with this forward curve. The portrait is close to that on the aurei and denarii dated TRP VIII and VIIII (a.d. 61/62 to 62/63) 23 and probably not so late as on those dated TRP X (a.d. 63/64). 24 The treatment of the rest of the hair has many points of contact with the later dated aurei and denarii. It is generally flat, 25 sometimes with a striking zonal treatment with thick rope-like strands. 26 This seems inspired by the dated gold and silver of a.d. 61/62 to a.d. 63/64 27 but is less advanced than the spirited rendering of the earliest undated gold 28 or the copper asses with SC. 29 The bust truncation often has, in greater or lesser degree, 30 the characteristic form of the dated gold and silver. 31

These copper asses without SC, moreover, clearly preceded the orichalcum As series with the same reverse types of Genius and Apollo (both with and without SC). There is a striking development of portraiture within the orichalcum As series, 32 but no comparable progression in the issue of copper asses without SC; and although the copper asses have many portraits that are quite close to those on the earlier orichalcum asses, they show nothing comparable to the later orichalcum portraits. The characteristic bust truncation of the dated aurei and denarii can be seen on several copper asses, but where there are traces in the orichalcum series it is only present in a residual and minor degree. The treatment of the hair on the orichalcum asses is generally in higher relief and shows more naturalism; and Lugdunum, which began its aes production some time after the mint of Rome, used as its model the reverse of an orichalcum Apollo As, not that of a copper Apollo As without SC. 33

End Notes

1
Cf. Michael Grant, From Imperium to Auctoritas (Cambridge, 1946), p. 121.
2
H. Mattingly, The Emperor and His Clients (Todd Memorial Lecture, Sydney, 1948), p. 6.
3
Sutherland, Coinage in Roman Imperial Policy, pp. 152 ff.
4
BMCRE I, pl. 48, 6.
5
BMCRE I, pl. 44, 10.
6
F. Gnecchi, I Medaglioni Romani (Milan, 1912), pl. 142, 2.
7
Anne S. Robertson, Roman Imperial Coins in the Hunter Coin Cabinet I (London/Glasgow/New York, 1962), pl. 22, 73.
8
RIN 1913, p. 22 and pl. 1, 4.
9
Found in the Tiber, now in the Terme Museum, Rome.
10
BMCRE I, pl. 44, 7.
11
Bought in Rome, said to have been found in the city.
12
BMCRE I, pl. 44, 9.
13
BMCRE I, pl. 44, 8.
14
RIN 1913, pp. 21 f., and pl. 1, 4.
15
RIC Hunter I, pl. 22, 72.
16
Probably found in Rome.
17
Found during excavations in Rome, RIN 1909, p. 20, 5, and Gnecchi, Medaglioni, pl. 141, 10.
18
RIC I, p. 171.
19
Cat. 246, 248, 252.
20
Copper asses of the Apollo and Genius' types have frequently been found in the western provinces, but they are the product of the distinctive Lugdunum mint. They always have the Lugdunum globe and characteristic bust truncation; the reverse always has SC; and in the Apollo series they use the form of legend PM TR POT IMP PP which is peculiar to Lugdunum on the copper asses.
21
Plate IX, 242, 246, 255.
22
Suetonius, Nero 51.
23
Plate I, 8, 14, 19.
24
Plate I, 20.
25
Plate IX, 242–55.
26
E.g. Plate IX, 242.
27
Plate I, 14, 19, 20.
28
Plate I, 22 ff.
29
Plates X, 278; XI, 283–301.

Copper Semisses Without SC

The parallel issue of copper semisses without SC consists of the following:

Cat. 303

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP Head laur. r.

Rev.: No legend. Roma helmeted and draped seated l. on cuirass, r. holding wreath and resting l. hand on parazonium.

Ars Classica 15, 1438 5.72 gm. A401 P401

Cat. 304

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMANIC Head laur. r.

Rev.: As 303 but with legend PON MAX TRP IMP PP

Mazzini 34 6.10 gm. A402 P402
Glasgow 82 35 6.74 gm. A402 P402
Walters 5.79 gm. A402 P402
Webb 5.46 gm. A402 P402

Plate XII

Cat. 305

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM Head laur. r.

Rev.: As 304.

BM 260 36 7.13 gm. A403 P403
Vierordt 872 A403 P403
Copenhagen 37 A403 P403
Hollschek 38 6.09 gm.
Trau 6.01 gm.
Trau 5.90 gm.
Dorotheum 5.89 gm.
Elmer 5.74 gm.
Hemfeld 5.62 gm.
Walla 5.48 gm.
Pohl 5.42 gm.

Cat. 306

Obv.: As 303.

Rev.: CERTAMEN QVINQ ROM CO

Gaming table ornamented by two griffins. On it, urn l. and wreath r. Against its central leg rests a round shield.

Oxford 4.34 gm. A404 P404
Paris 6.40 gm. A404 P404
Naples 6.13 gm. A404 P404

Cat. 307

Obv.: As 303.

Rev.: As 306 but CERTAM QVINQ ROM CO

BM 259 39 6.34 gm. A404 P405
Glasgow 81 5.96 gm. A404 P405
Vautier 321 6.57 gm. A404 P405
Elmer 40 5.90 gm.
Walla 5.72 gm.
Elsner 5.62 gm.

Plate XII

These copper semisses without SC are easily distinguished from the normal orichalcum semisses at Rome by the size of their flans and dies, their comparatively heavy weight, and the reddish copper appearance of the metal. Their weight range is clearly higher than that of the Lugdunum copper semisses. Their obverse portraits are unmistakably Roman in style and idiom, and show about the same stage of development as the copper asses without SC. 41 Nero's hair is always shown "in gradus," but sometimes the tier is only at its first stage and has not been formalized into the distinctive forward curving arch. 42 The influence of the dated gold and silver 43 can usually be detected in the bust truncation and sometimes Nero's head is small and fails to make full use of the obverse field within the legend. 44

A further indication of their approximately contemporary date is given by two overstrikes in the British Museum 45 and in Stockholm. Both seem to be copper asses of Nero without SC overstruck by the same pair of dies. In each case the reverse overstriking die is of the Genius type used for asses without SC, and the obverse overstriking die is of the type used at Rome in the issue of copper semisses without SC. Mattingly attributed the British Museum example to Lugdunum 46 and implied that it belonged to the opening phase of the new mint. He wrote 'The obverse die is very small and the head is in the Roman style: the reverse is of normal size and of Lugdunum style. Traces of the original coin (a dupondius of the mint of Rome) with rev. Temple of Janus obv … CLAVD CAESAR AVG G … still remain." We can, however, confidently attribute all the component parts of the overstrike to the mint of Rome. It has a copper flan of 14.94 gm.—the metal having been established by spectrographic analysis. As it is not of orichalcum, it can not have been originally a dupondius. Yet for an As, the highest denomination struck in copper, it is heavy but within the weight range of the copper asses without SC. Of its original obverse type, "CLAVD CAESAR AVG G …" and "… AR AVG GER PM TR P IMP P …" can be read on the London and Stockholm pieces respectively—a normal legend for Nero's copper asses without SC. Little remains of the original reverse type but there seem to be traces of a standing figure which may well have been that of Apollo citharoedus. The overstriking obverse die is a copper semis obverse die of the Roman mint: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TR P PP, a youthful, bare, head of Nero to right. The overstriking reverse die is of the GENIO AVGVSTI type without SC, a type found exclusively at Rome.

Mattingly's attribution to Lugdunum seems to be based on his belief that the Genius type was normally struck at Rome only in orichalcum. 47 He did not realize that there was a series of copper asses at Rome of the Genius type omitting SC and his description of the overstrike does not make it clear that the type generally lacks SC.

Nero instituted the Certamen Quinquennale in a.d. 60, 48 but that date merely gives a terminus post quem for the certamen semisses; and the use of the type was not restricted to the years in which the certamen was celebrated. 49

End Notes

30
Plate IX, 242–55.
31
Plate I, 2–19.
32
Plate X, 260–76.
33
See below p. 99.
34
RIN 1913, p. 22 and pl. 1, 3.
35
RIC Hunter I, pl. 22, 82.
36
BMCRE I, pl. 45, 4.
37
Gnecchi, Medaglioni, pl. 141, 12.
38
The weight of this and of the seven following examples are given by G. Elmer, "Die Kleinkupferprägung von Augustus bis Traian,'' NZ 1934, p. 20.
39
BMCRE I, pl. 45, 3.
40
The weights of this and of the two following examples are given by Elmer, NZ 1934, P. 20.
41
Plate IX, 242–55.
42
The semisses Ars Classica Sale xv, 1438, and BM 259 cited above.
43
Plate I, 19–20.
44
As the semis BM 259 (BMCRE I, pl. 45, 3).
45
Plate XXII, a.
46
BMCRE I, p. 273, 372 and note.
47
BMCRE I, p. 243, note*.
48
Tacitus, Annals XIV. 20.
49
See my note, "The Numismatic Evidence for the Neronia." Classical Quarterly 1958, pp. 192–94.

Copper Quadrantes Without SC

The parallel issue of copper quadrantes without SC consists of the following:

Cat. 336

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM

A helmet placed r. on column; against the cippus rests round shield; behind, spear slanting upward to r.

Rev.: PON M TR P IMP PP

A laurel branch.

Paris A501 P501
Oxford 3.41 gm. A501 P501
Vatican 2.50 gm. A501 P501
Berlin 2.97 gm.

Cat. 337 50

Obv.: As 336 but legend NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG

Rev.: As 336 but legend GER PON MAX TRP IMP PP

BM 286 3.31 gm. A502 P502
Oxford 2.58 gm. A502 P502
Blackburn A502 P502
Glasgow 85 3.52 gm. A502 P502
Rome, Capitol A503 P502
Hague 3.55 gm. A504 P502
Vienna 3.12 gm. A504 P503

Plate XII

The coin in the Capitol Museum came from excavations in Rome, but the other examples are unprovenanced. Although these quadrantes have no portraits and thus give little indication in themselves of their date and place of minting, finds suggest that the quadrantes with SC in both copper and orichalcum belong to the mint of Rome; and the use of IMP as a cognomen throughout shows that the whole series falls before mid-a.d. 66. The pattern of their issues generally shows the same development as that of the asses at Rome and they seem to be parallel to them.

End Notes

50
Gnecchi, Medaglioni, pl. 142, 3.

Orichalcum Denominations Without SC

The second group of aes without SC consisted of sestertii, dupondii, laureate and radiate head asses and quadrantes, all in orichalcum. The different denominations of this group seem to belong to the same general period, and to have been struck fairly soon after the issue of asses and semisses without SC in copper.

Orichalcum Sestertii Without SC

An examination of the dies of the sestertii without SC has made it possible to define far more clearly the extent of the group. It is necessary, of course, to exclude all sestertii on which the letters SC have been deliberately tooled out and those where the SC may have disappeared through wear and corrosion. Among the sestertii that seem genuinely to omit SC, it is usually possible to substantiate the same reverse die from several coins, none of which has any trace at all of SC. Several of these reverse dies belong to a die-linked chain in which all the reverse dies similarly omit SC. There is inevitably an element of uncertainty when a reverse die without SC is known merely from a single coin and is not die-linked to other sestertii without SC; but dies of all the main reverse types of sestertii omitting SC—Adlocutio, Annona, Congiarium and Decursio (showing Nero riding right accompanied by two foot soldiers)—are firmly placed in die-linked groups.

Cat. 70

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP Head laur. r. aegis.

Rev.: ADLOCVT COH (in exergue)

Nero standing l. on platform accompanied by praetorian prefect, addressing three soldiers, two of whom hold standards.

Paris 30.70 gm. A101 P101
Florence 31.30 gm. A102 P102

Cat. 71

Obv.: As 70.

Rev.: ANNONA AVGVSTI CERES

Ceres seated l. holding torch and ears of corn; before her Annona standing holding a cornucopiae.

Vatican 22.60 gm. A103 P103
Rome, Terme A103 P104
Paris 32.65 gm. A104 P105
Vatican 27.00 gm. A105 P106

Plate II

Cat. 72

Obv.: As 70.

Rev.: CONG II DAT POP

To l., a high platform on which Nero sits; in front, a seated official distributes largess to man ascending ladder.

Glasgow 54 25.69 gm. A105 P107
Stockholm A105 P107
Florence 27.38 gm. A101 P108

Cat. 73

Obv.: As 70.

Rev.: CONG II DAT POP

To r. a low platform on which Nero sits l.; beside him, the prefect standing; in front, soldier distributes largess to a citizen.

Oxford 29.42 gm. A106 P109

Cat. 74

Obv.: As 70.

Rev.: DECVRSIO (in exergue)

Nero on horseback galloping r., preceded and followed by a foot soldier.

Vatican 25.70 gm. A103 P110
Krausz 121 A103 P110
Paris 27.60 gm. A107 P111
Vienna 26.10 gm. A107 P111
Glasgow 55 51 25.03 gm. A107 P112
Hague 31.00 gm. A104 P113
Egger XLIII, 442 A104 P113
Rome, Terme A104 P114
Milan 26.50 gm. A104 P115

Plate II

Mazzini 94 28.04 gm. A104 P115
Oxford 27.24 gm. A105 P116
Madrid A108 P116
Madrid A108 P116
Copenhagen 29.09 gm. A101 P117
Paris 31.46 gm. A101 P117

Cat. 75

Obv.: As 70.

Rev.: DECVRSIO (in exergue)

Nero on horseback galloping r. followed by horseman holding vexillum.

Rome, Terme A109 P118

Cat. 76

Obv.: As 70 but head laur. l.

Rev.: As 70.

BM 126 26.41 gm. A110 P119
Vienna 27.80 gm. A110 P120
Rome, Terme A100 P119
Lyons A100 P119
Ryan 2283 A111 P121

Plate II

Cat. 77

Obv.: As 76.

Rev.: As 71.

Copenhagen 27.15 gm. A111 P122
Vatican 30.20 gm. A112 P123
Oxford 26.69 gm. A113 P124
Oxford photo. A114 P125
Horsky 2932 A114 P126

Cat. 78

Οbν.: As 76.

Rev.: As 74.

Florence 28.52 gm. A111 P127
Vatican 27.40 gm. A111 P128
Rome, Terme A111 P128
BM 155 52 27.04 gm. A111 P128
Trau 438 A111 P128
Stockholm A111 P129
Simon 247 A110 P129
Milan 28.50 gm. A110 P130
Paris 26.20 gm. A110 P129
Glasgow 56 25.91 gm. A115 P116
Signorelli 1147 A115 P116
Hall 53 A115 P116
Vienna 29.00 gm. A115 P116

Plate III

Cat. 79

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP Head laur. r. aegis.

Rev.: As 74.

Vatican 27.40 gm. A116 P127

Cat. 80

Obv.: As 79.

Rev.: As 75.

BM 142bis 27.50 gm. A117 P131
Madrid A117 P137

Cat. 81

Obv.: As 79 but head laur. l.

Rev.: As 70.

Paris 29.80 gm. A118 P132
Signorelli 1131 A118 P132

Cat. 82

Obv.: As 81.

Rev.: As 72 but CONG II DAT POP R

Paris 28.48 gm. A119 P133
Vatican 27.90 gm. A119 P134
Vienna 28.30 gm. A118 P135
Paris 28.52 gm. A118 P135
Walters 382 A118 P135
Madrid R. A. 28.68 gm.

Cat. 83

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP Head laur. r.

Rev.: As 74.

Oxford 27.72 gm. A120 P136

Most of the sestertii without SC are unprovenanced, although one of the DECVRSIO type showing Nero accompanied by two foot soldiers was found at Ostia. 54 There is, however, no doubt from general considerations of their style and idiom that they were products of the mint of Rome. Heads in right profile invariably show traces of the aegis in front of Nero's bust; this is frequently seen on sestertii at Rome but never at Lugdunum which always had the globe. The obverse legends often use the abbreviations CLAVDIVS and GERM, which are repeatedly found at Rome but never at Lugdunum. The bust truncation is closely similar to that on many coins of the Roman mint, and is quite different from the characteristic M truncation of Lugdunum. Though most of their reverse types were used at both Rome and Lugdunum in the SC series, the type of DECVRSIO with Nero accompanied by two foot soldiers was used exclusively at Rome.

The condition and state of wear of several pieces clearly show that the group passed into general circulation as ordinary sestertii, whatever the original purpose of the issue had been.

The reverse types of these sestertii without SC were all early types at the mint of Rome. No authenticated piece without SC has the praenomen IMP in Nero's obverse titulature; and these reverse types were never employed at Rome with the praenomen IMP, even in an SC series. This places them all before the middle of a.d. 66 when Nero took the praenomen "imperator" into his titulature.

A 101 P 101 Adlocutio
P 108 Congiarium 1.
P 117 Decursio Vex.
A 102 P 102 Adlocutio
A 103 P 103 Annona
P 104 Annona
P 110 Decursio Vex.
A 104 P 105 Annona
P 113 Decursio Vex.
P 114 Decursio Vex.
P 115 Decursio Vex.
A 105 P 106 Annona
P 107 Congiarium 1.
A 108 P 106 Decursio Vex.
A 115
A 106 P 109 Congiarium r.
A 107 P 111 Decursio Vex.
P 112 Decursio Vex.
A 109 P 118 Decursio r.
A no P 119 Adlocutio
P120 Adlocutio
P 130 Decursio Vex.
A 111 P 129 Decursio Vex.
P 121 Adlocutio
P 122 Annona
P 128 Decursio Vex.
A 116 P 127 Decursio Vex.
A 112 P 123 Annona
A 113 P 124 Annona
A 114 P 125 Annona
P 126 Annona
A 117 P 131 Decursio r.
A 118 P 132 Adlocutio
P 135 Congiarium l.
A 119 P 133 Congiarium l.
P 134 Congiarium l.
A 120 P 136 Decursio Vex.

Fig. 1. Sestertii Without SC Rome Issue II

Sestertii without SC nearly always had the comparatively rare forms of obverse legend: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP and NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP

The most common form of obverse legend on SC sestertii without the praenomen IMP at the Roman mint: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP occurs only once, and the fairly common form: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP is never found on sestertii that omit SC.

The portraits on the sestertii without SC are invariably early for the aes, but seem to be closer to the orichalcum asses without SC than to that of the copper asses without SC. The obverse portraits in right profile always showed Nero's hair "in gradus formata," sometimes in a pronounced forward arch, but at other times with the front curl bending upward back over itself in a less advanced way. 55 Some obverse dies showed Nero's hair in thick rope-like strands, a treatment closely paralleled in the obverse of an orichalcum As without SC.

Sometimes the engraver did not make full use of the field for his obverse portrait; and sometimes the letters of the obverse legend were badly spaced and crowded at the end. This strongly suggests the product of an engraver unaccustomed to work in the dimensions of a sestertius die and with no satisfactory models to copy. One obverse die used with two reverse dies omitting SC was also used on a uniface piece. 56 All this very strongly suggests an early place in Nero's aes issues.

The weight standard of these sestertii without SC affords further evidence of their early date. The sestertius standard dropped steadily during the later Julio-Claudian period. The weights of the sestertii without SC cover a fairly wide range but fall between 26 and 28.5 gm., below the main Claudian range (28 to 30.5 gm.) and above Nero's sestertii with the praenomen IMP (24.5 to 26 gm.), but in the upper reaches of Nero's main sestertius series with SC at Rome (24 to 28.5 gm.). 57

End Notes

51
RIC Hunter I, pl. 21, 55.
52
BMCRE I, pl. 42, 5.
53
BMCRE I, pl. 48, 3.
54
Now in the Museum at Ostia. There are no signs of SC on its reverse. Although the coin is somewhat corroded it almost certainly never had SC, as sestertii of this type without SC are not uncommon whereas those with SC are extremely rare.
55
Plate II, 71.
56
Helbing Sale October 24, 1927, 3429.
57
See table of sestertius weights, Appendix II, Table 5.

Orichalcum Dupondii Without SC

The parallel issue of dupondii without SC is known from the following:

Cat. 177

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP Head bare r.

Rev.: VICTORIA AVGVSTI No SC or mark of value.

Victoria draped, flying l., r. holding wreath, l. a palm.

Walters Coll. 15.74 gm. A2001 P2001

Plate V

Cat. 178

Obv.: As 177 but head bare l.

Rev.: As 177.

Stockholm A2101 P2002

Cat. 179

Obv.: As 177 but head laur. r.

Rev.: As 177.

Blackburn A2002 P2003
Oslo A2002 P2009

Plate VI

Cat. 180

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP Head laur. r.

Rev.: No legend, SC or mark of value.

Front view of Macellum Magnum.

Plate VI

BM 196 58 17.63 gm. A2201 P2101
Wulzinger 17.80 gm. A2201 P2101
Mazzini 359 14.71 gm. A2201 P2101
Paris 17.00 gm. A2202 P2101
Paris 18.15 gm. A2202 P2101
Cambridge 14.75 gm. A2202 P2101

Plate VI

Cat. 181

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP Head rad. r.

Rev.: As 177.

Oxford 20.42 gm. A2003 P2004
Hague 17.30 gm. A2003 P2004

Plate VI

Cat. 182

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP P Head rad. l.

Rev.: As 177.

Stockholm A2004 P2005

Cat. 183

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP Head rad. l.

Rev.: SECVRITAS AVGVSTI No SC or mark of value.

Securitas std. r. on throne, l. holding sceptre, r. elbow resting on back of throne.

Vienna 15.53 gm. A2301 P2201
Copenhagen 16.00 gm. A2301 P2201
Oxford 14.66 gm. A2301 P2201

Plate VI

Cat. 184

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP P Head rad. r.

Rev.: As 180.

Plate VI

BM 197 59 14.68 gm. A2203 P2102
Rome, Terme 15.70 gm. A2203 P2102
Copenhagen 16.04 gm. A2204 P2102
ANS 15.74 gm. A2204 P2102
Budapest A2204 P2102
Budapest A2204 P2102
Prince W. I, 201 A2204 P2102

Plate VI

Cat. 185

Obv.: As 184.

Rev.: As 177.

BM 221 60 17.12 gm. A2201 P2006
Florence 17.09 gm. A2201 P2007
Oxford 16.92 gm. A2201 P2007
Glasgow 64 61 14.69 gm. A2201 P2007

Plate VII

Cat. 186

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP Head rad. r.

Rev.: As 180.

Paris 62 20.25 gm. A2601 P2103
Rome, Terme 16.11 gm. A2601 P2103

Plate VII

Cat. 187

Obv.: As 186.

Rev.: As 183.

Cambridge 15.14 gm. A2602 P2202

Plate VII

Cat. 188

Obv.: As 186.

Rev.: As 177.

Rome, Terme A2601 P2008

Plate VII

There is no evidence from site finds to establish the areas in which the dupondii without SC circulated, but their affinities of type and style clearly show that they were the product of the mint of Rome.

The VICTORIA AVGVSTI type shows victory flying left (with no indication of a ground line) holding a wreath and a palm and with her right leg well forward and clear of her drapery. 63 This is the representation of victory to left which was invariably used in the normal SC dupondius series at Rome. 64 The Lugdunum type was quite distinct. It showed victory walking (always showing a ground line) with her left leg straight in a line with her body and her drapery billowing backward shrouding her right leg in its folds. 65

SECVRITAS AVGVSTI is represented in two distinct ways on the dupondii without SC. Sometimes she is fully draped in a thin chiton, the presence of which can easily be seen, even on worn specimens, by the folds of its overlap. 66 On others she is shown naked to the waist, round which her garments are drawn in heavy folds. 67 Both representations were used on SC dupondii at Rome, 68 but only the first was employed at Lugdunum.

On the anepigraphic Macellum dupondii the steps are always shown inside a regular rectangular encasement, and the steps themselves are flanked at each side by an unmistakable baluster. 69 In slightly varied forms this was the regular representation of the steps at Rome. 70 At Lugdunum, however, the encasement of the steps became formalized into a quasi-triangular representation narrowing at the top. 71 The position of the balusters was still indicated, but the engravers seem to have lost all clear idea of their function.

On the dupondii without SC seven of the ten obverse dies show Nero's head radiate. In the main SC series Rome always employed the radiate and Lugdunum the laureate head. The three exceptional dies on dupondii without SC with the bare and laureate heads have no Lugdunum affinities. Their obverse legends NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TR P IMP PP and NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TR P IMP PP belong exclusively to Rome, and their bust truncation was quite distinct from the characteristic Lugdunum form.

The portraits on the dupondii without SC are the youngest ones on that denomination under Nero. They all show Nero's hair "in gradus formata" along the whole line of his forehead and must be placed about the period of the aurei and denarii dated TRP VIIII and X. But the arch of Nero's front hair is not fully developed into the forward curve of most of the portraits in the main SC series. 72 The two laureate heads retain a zonal treatment of the hair similar to that on the copper asses without SC; the bare head has many points in common with that issue; and the radiate heads are generally close to the portraits on the sestertii without SC. On all the obverse dies there are distinct traces of the lingering influence of the old bust truncation of the dated aurei and denarii. 73

The metal in every case seems to be the normal orichalcum, which was used for the main SC dupondius series, and spectrographic analysis has confirmed this for the pieces in the British Museum. Their weights cover a very large range and are rather erratic. Two examples in Oxford and Paris weigh more than 20 gm. A frequency table shows that the general weight range of these dupondii without SC is virtually the same as that of the Claudian SC dupondii, but slightly higher than the earliest group of Nero's dupondii with SC and the mark of value īī. There is, however, a considerable overlap, and the weights of the dupondii without SC do not remove them into a category apart. 74

The weight range of the later dupondii with SC alone is slightly lower again than that of dupondii with SC and the mark of value īī. There is evidence of a rise in the value of orichalcum in these years, and during the issue of orichalcum asses there was a marked lowering of the weight standard, later portraits always occurring on asses of lower weight. The natural explanation of the slightly higher weight range of the dupondii without SC, is that they are slightly earlier than the main Roman issue with SC and the mark of value īī. Mattingly's figure of 18.46 gm. (284.86 grains) as the average weight of 5 dupondii without SC seems to be an unfortunate misprint. 75 His average is considerably higher than the individual weights of any of the five coins which he can have used. The average of the three pieces described in the Catalogue is 16.47 gm.; and if we include two dupondii without SC, whose weights are recorded in the British Museum's cast collection, the average comes to 16.21 gm. (250.2 grains).

Equally significant are the reverse types. Dupondii without SC never have the praenomen imperator 76 themselves, nor are the same types subsequently used in an SC series with the praenomen. This is further evidence that these types are indeed the early dupondius types of the mint of Rome, and reinforces the evidence of portraiture and weight that the dupondii without SC preceded the main issue.

End Notes

58
BMCRE I, pl. 43, 6.
59
BMCRE I, pl. 43, 7.
60
BMCRE I, pl. 44, 3.
61
RIC Hunter I, pl. 22, 64.
62
Gnecchi, Medaglioni, pl. 142, 4.
63
Plate VI, 181.
64
Plate VII, 205.
65
Plate XV, 495.
66
Plate VI, 183.
67
Plate VII, 187.
68
Plate VII, 198.
69
Plate VI, 180.
70
Plate VIII, 207.
71
Plate XIV, 490, 493.
72
Plate XIV, 490 ff.
73
Plate I, 19 –20.
74
See table of dupondius weights Appendix II, Table 5.
75
BMCRE I, p. iv.

Orichalcum Asses Without SC

Closely associated with the other orichalcum denominations without SC are the orichalcum asses without SC:

Cat. 257

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS Head laur. r.

Rev.: PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP No SC or mark of value. Nero laur. advancing r. in the flowing robes of Apollo citharoedus, l. hand holding a lyre and r. playing it.

Vienna 9.50 gm. A341 P341
Paris 9.07 gm. A341 P341
Oxford 8.86 gm. A341 P341
Stockholm A341 P341
Copenhagen 8.94 gm. A342 P344
Cambridge 8.50 gm. A342 P341
Rome, Terme 9.62 gm. A342 P342
Vienna 8.50 gm. A342 P342
Copenhagen 10.28 gm. A342 P342
Bahrfeldt 513 9.63 gm. A342 P342
Paris 8.30 gm. A342 P343
Helbing 17, 447 A342 P343
Glasgow 77 9.30 gm. A342 P345

Plate IX

Plate X

Plate X

Cat. 258

Obv.: As 257.

Rev.: GENIO AVGVSTI No SC or mark of value.

Genius standing l.; l. holding cornucopiae, r. patera.

Vienna 9.50 gm. A342 P346

Plate X

Cat. 259

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS Head rad. r.

Rev.: As 257.

Madrid A346 P353

Cat. 260

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANIC

Head rad. r.

Rev.: As 257.

BM 257 9.07 gm. A343 P347
Paris 8.63 gm. A343 P347
Vierordt 875 A343 P347
Oxford 8.73 gm. A343 P348
Vienna 8.60 gm. A343 P348
Copenhagen 8.51 gm. A343 P348

Plate X

Cat. 261

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP Head rad. r.

Rev.: As 258.

Glasgow 65 77 8.58 gm. A344 P349
Milan 8.60 gm. A344 P349
Warsaw 8.55 gm. A344 P349
Naples A344 P349
Morcom 2102 A344 P349
Vienna 8.75 gm. A345 P350
Vienna 8.75 gm. A345 P350
Vatican 7.10 gm. A345 P350
BM 8.41 gm. A345 P350

Plate X

Florence 8.55 gm. A345 P351
Oxford 8.33 gm. A345 P351
Copenhagen 8.42 gm. A345 P351
BM 8.27 gm. A345 P351
Gotha A345 P351
Budapest A345 P352
York A345 P352
A 341 P 341 Apollo
A 342 P 342 Apollo
P 343 Apollo
P 344 Apollo
P 345 Apollo
P 346 Genius
A 343 P 347 Apollo
P 348 Apollo
A 344 P 349 Genius
A 345 P 350 Genius
P 351 Genius
P 352 Genius
A 346 P 353 Apollo

Fig. 2. Orichalcum Asses Without SC Rome Issue II

The laureate head asses without SC 78 constitute a closely dielinked group. The radiate head asses without SC 79 are not linked with this group but seem to be associated closely with it. As a group, the orichalcum asses without SC follow the copper asses without SC and precede the main issue of orichalcum asses with SC and the mark of value ī. The stage of their development is shown by the advance in treatment between A341 and A342, two die-linked obverse dies. A341 still shows Nero's hair in strong rope-like strands as on some of the copper asses without SC. But A342, 80 while not much more developed in age, heralds the new approach of the main aes series 81 in its careful rendering of Nero's curls.

During the course of the main series of orichalcum asses with SC and ī there was a reduction in the weight standard of the denomination, and coins of lower weight are invariably found with the later portraits. Plotted against the weights of the main series, the orichalcum asses without SC are all comparatively high, and must belong to the period before the weight standard was reduced. 82 As with the other denominations, the combined evidence of portraiture and weight suggests clearly that the orichalcum asses without SC preceded the main series.

It is interesting to note that the group without SC seems to be quite separate from the main issue with SC and ī; and no die links have yet been noted between the two groups. Quite a number of coins, however, were struck without SC, 83 and some obverse dies remained in use after the development of a die flaw. The flaw in A343 can be seen clearly on the example in Copenhagen and at a later stage on the coins in the BM, Paris and Vienna. 84 The flaw which can be seen on the coins in Milan and Glasgow struck from A344 had deteriorated further before the coin in Naples was struck from the same obverse die.

End Notes

76
The praenomen was assumed during TRP XII (a.d. 66/67) and regularly used thereafter by Nero; see pp. 4–7.
77
RIC Hunter I, pl. 22, 65.
78
Plate X, 257–58.
79
Plate X, 260, 261.
80
Plate X, 257.
81
Plate X, 262, 267.

Orichalcum Quadrantes Without SC

The rare quadrantes in orichalcum without SC and without any mark of value should also be attributed to this second group:

Cat. 338

Obv.: NERO CLAV CAESAR AVG GER

Helmet placed r. on column; against the cippus rests a round shield; behind, spear slanting upward to r.

Rev.: PON M TRP IMP PP

Laurel branch.

Vatican 2.35 gm. A511 P511
Manchester 1.68 gm. A511 P511
Vienna 2.12 gm. A512 P511

Plate XII

Cat. 339

Obv.: As 338 but legend NERO CLA CAE AVG GERM

Rev.: As 338 but legend PM TR P IMP PP

BM 293 2.27 gm. A513 P512

Cat. 340

Obv.: As 338 but legend NERO CLA CAE AVG GER

Rev.: As 339.

BM 292 2.02 gm. A514 P513

Cat. 340a

Obv.: Nero-Owl NERO CL CAE AVG GER

Rev.: As 339.

ANS

End Notes

82
See Appendix II, Table 7, table of orichalcum as weights.
83
Altogether 5 obverse and 12 reverse dies have been noted.
84
Plate X, 260.

Significance of the Omission of SC

Various explanations have been offered for Nero's aes without SC. Gnecchi regarded them as medallions; Grant has called them forerunners of medallions; and Mattingly and Sydenham have suggested that some are patterns for the Lugdunum mint, while some may have been used as presentation pieces by the Emperor. Each of these suggestions, however, gives rise to serious difficulties.

Gnecchi's 85 view is: 1) the pieces can be distinguished from the senatorial issues only by the lack of SC; 2) the omission of SC shows them to be products of the imperial mint; 3) in this respect they are prototypes of imperial medallions 86 and were given to the people on the occasion of congiaria, feasts, games, etc.

Gnecchi started from the assumption that the mint was basically divided into a senatorial officina issuing bronze and an imperial one which issued gold and silver; and his description of the aes without SC as "imperial" presupposes the old dyarchic constitutional theory, which the researches of recent historians have done much to undermine. 87 Gnecchi's suggestion that the coins without SC were given to the people on the occasion of congiaria, feasts and games is extremely interesting, but he adduced no evidence from ancient authorities to support his suggestion. We know that donatives were given, but we have no evidence that aes without SC was given on these occasions. Indeed other considerations make it most unlikely that this was its purpose under Nero. Coins without SC are found in all denominations down to semisses and quadrantes. It is difficult to see the point of presentation farthings! Although aes was issued at Rome for the last four years of Nero, all the coins without SC belong to the beginning of that period. Were the presentations then confined to a single year? The only congiarium of Nero mentioned by the ancient authors was in a.d. 57, 88 long before Nero began to issue aes either with or without SC.

Grant 89 has modified this view to avoid some of Gnecchi's worst difficulties. While he only discusses the dupondii in detail, he apparently intends his explanation to cover all the denominations of Nero without SC. He claims that these dupondii are distinguished from the ordinary series by other features than the mere omission of SC: 1) they are extremely rare, "Such aes issues apart from the omission of SC are usually identical in type, and (as analysis has now shown) alloy, with further aes pieces which were clearly issued in millions [sic]. Thus dupondii with the present type [VICTORIA AVGVSTI] and SC are very common indeed, and must have been issued in enormous quantities (at more than one mint), … whereas the coin illustrated here [VICTORIA AVGVSTI] without SC is of considerable rarity;" 2) the weights of pieces without SC are considerably higher. Grant quotes the average weight of dupondii at Rome omitting SC as nearly 285 grains while his estimated standard for the SC pieces is 236 grains. "This difference cannot by any means be accounted for by the comparative absence of wear of these restricted issues, for that factor does not, in this denomination, make a difference of more than 12 to 14 grains 3) "they show a superiority, or at any rate a distinctiveness, of portraiture and of style."

These unorthodox features, Grant claims, justify the description of ''pre-medallions"—a term which he applies to other coins of limited circulation. Finally he suggests an occasion for their issue which avoids the difficulties to which Gnecchi's view gave rise, by connecting them with the decennalia of Nero and the fiftieth anniversary of the death of Augustus.

Grant's account of the additional features which distinguish the dupondii without SC is, however, open to serious objections. Dupondii without SC are undoubtedly rare, but Grant overstates their rarity in comparison with dupondii of the same type with SC. The dupondii without SC were struck at Rome, and their rarity should be compared with that of other issues at Rome of the same types with SC. In the major accessible public collections from which my material is drawn, I have counted five reverse dies of the VICTORIA AVGVSTI type without SC and 29 dies of the same type with SC. In any case should we regard rarity as our criterion for a medallic issue?

Grant's strongest argument should be the completely different weight standard which he claims for the dupondii without SC. But his figures are based on those given by Mattingly which, are at least 34 grains too high—the result, apparently, of a misprint. 90 As has been indicated, the weight range of Nero's dupondii without SC is virtually the same as that of the pieces of Claudius, and only slightly higher than the earliest group of Neronian dupondii with SC and the mark of value īī. There is in fact a considerable overlap; their weights do not remove the dupondii without SC into a category apart; and the slight difference merely indicates a slightly earlier date for their issue.

Grant's third distinctive feature is "a superiority, or at any rate a distinctiveness, of portraiture and of style." But equally fine portraits of equally fine style can be seen in many coins of the main dupondius series with SC, and thus style here is not in itself a sufficient criterion. There is indeed a distinctiveness about some of the portraits, but this is probably due to the slightly earlier and experimental nature of the pieces.

The only differentiating features, then, which it seems can legitimately be ascribed to the dupondii without SC are a comparative rarity, a slightly higher weight range than the normal dupondii, and a certain distinctiveness in portraiture. Only the last two represent an advance on Gnecchi's position, and they hardly justify more than the assertion that the coins are slightly earlier than the main series with SC. It is still possible to assert, as Gnecchi did, that they are precursors of medallions, but the only reason that can legitimately be offered is that they lack SC.

Mattingly has suggested of these coins without SC, that "some of them were patterns for the Lugdunum mint, some possibly presents for the Emperor's friends, some are due to the account of modern improvers of coins." 91 The last group has been rigorously excluded; the difficulties in regarding any of the coins as presentation pieces have been discussed above; and an analysis of the aes without SC leaves little ground for supposing that any of them was used as a pattern by the reconstituted Lugdunum mint.

The principal forms of legend on the aes without SC were used exclusively at the mint of Rome. The forms: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP and NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP used on sestertii and dupondii without SC were also used in the main series with SC at Rome, but never at Lugdunum. Only the comparatively rare form NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP was used on sestertii and dupondii in the series with SC at both Rome and Lugdunum.

The copper asses and semisses without SC show Nero's head bare, as do the copper asses and semisses at Lugdunum, whereas the Roman copper asses with SC always have Nero's head laureate; but the first Lugdunum issue of asses copied a Roman orichalcum As with SC and the mark of value, and the first Lugdunum issue of semisses copied an ordinary Roman orichalcum semis. Moreover the Apollo and Genius copper asses without SC demonstrably circulated in Rome and Italy and the series is known from more than thirty obverse and as many reverse dies.

The characteristic forms of reverse type on the aes without SC were all subsequently used in the series with SC at Rome, but some of them were never employed at Lugdunum; and even when Lugdunum used a reverse type that had previously been used in the issue without SC, it seems rather to have copied its representation from the later Roman coins with SC, e.g., one representation of the Decursio type (with Nero riding right preceded and followed by a foot soldier) was issued at Rome both with and without SC (Plate II, 74; III, 78) but never at Lugdunum, and the Lugdunum form of the Macellum type (Plate XIV, 490, 493; XVI, 501) always had the legend MAC AVG, whereas that of the issue without SC was anepigraphic (Plate VI, 180, 184; VII, 186).

As both the groups of aes without SC preceded the main aes issues at Rome and were thoroughly Roman in type and content, they might possibly be regarded as patterns for the mint of Rome. The evidence of finds, however, and the state of wear of many examples without SC make it abundantly clear that the coins without SC did in fact circulate. It is, of course, possible for patterns to slip into circulation; but each of Nero's types without SC is known from several dies, the copper asses without SC are known from more than thirty obverse dies, and some of the obverse dies in the second group without SC remained in use after the development of die flaws. All this distinctly suggests that the two groups of aes without SC constituted two small issues.

The explanations of Gnecchi, Grant and Mattingly are all based on the assumption that S(enatus) C(onsulto) means 'struck by order of the Senate" and seek to explain how Nero's aes without SC could have been struck without this authorization. But in a recent study Kraft 92 has questioned the validity of this assumption. He notes that by the 6o's b.c. there was a clear and specific relation between SC and the type of the coins on which SC is found, that there was a personalized application of these new principles in Octavian's favor. He asks why SC is found regularly on the aes of the Augustan moneyers but not on their gold and silver, unless SC refers specifically to the type content of the aes. He analyzes the few issues of aes of the Julio-Claudians that lack SC, such as the SPQR OB CIVES SERVATOS SPQR MEMORIAE AGRIPPINAE and EXSC corona civica types and notes that most of them specifically illustrate and define honors conferred publicly on the imperial house or are presentation types. Kraft argues that such an absence of SC indicates that the origin of the formula on the aes lay in the honors with which it was associated, not in the authorization as such of the coinage; and he concludes that SC means "honour in the form of the corona civica, etc., bestowed on the Emperor by decree of the Senate."

Kraft's arguments seem to be heavily supported for the Augustan period by Sutherland's further study of the symbolism of the aes coinages of Augustus.93 The CA issues of Asia, the SC issues of Antioch, the Altar issues of Lugdunum, and the issues of several city coinages in Spain are shown to have had one major and consistent purpose—the duty of recalling the supreme honors paid to Augustus after Actium, and in each case the honors are accompanied by a reference to the agency authorizing the honors shown. On the other hand, Aase Bay reminds us that we should also consider constitutional and administrative practice. She points out that the letters SC under Augustus and the aes of the reopened mint of Rome with the coin reform of Augustus introducing orichalcum go together. In this context she sees SC as something to vouch for the legality of the new experimental currency — the guarantee and authorization for the new issue. 94

It is particularly difficult to accept Kraft's thesis for the varied reverse types of the later Julio-Claudian coinages. During this period, some reverse types have a specifically senatorial reference relating to the type such as DIVO AVGVSTO SPQR on the sestertii of Tiberius, EX SC OB CIVES SERVATOS with the corona civica on aurei, denarii and sestertii of Claudius, and EXSC with the corona civica on the prereform aurei and denarii of Nero. But otherwise the aes denominations normally had the senatorial reference whatever their reverse types might be; and the gold and silver never had the senatorial references SC even when it used the same types as the aes. Under Claudius, for example, CONSTANTIAE AVGVSTI is used as a type on all three metals, but only the aes uses the type with SC. Again in Nero's post-reform coinages, the seated Roma and Janus temple types are used on all three metals, but only the aes denominations use the types with SC. 95 In this important respect the aes denominations are differentiated sharply from the gold and silver. If there is no other senatorial reference arising out of the type, the aes denominations deliberately introduce a reference to the Senate in the form of SC.

The notable exception is the aes of Nero without SC. The reverse types of these issues: Adlocutio, Annona, Congiarium and Decursio on the sestertii; Macellum, Securitas and Victoria on the dupondii; Apollo and Genius on the asses; Roma and the Table on the semisses omit SC in Issues I and II at Rome, but use it in Issues III and IV. By this stage SC can hardly refer to the type alone. Otherwise it should be found equally on all aes issues with the same types.

We can therefore accept Kraft's view about the original significance of SC under Augustus but we must equally accept Mattingly's correction 96 of Kraft—that there was subsequently a change of use and the original reference of the SC may itself have been ambiguous. There is still a "concordia" of emperor and senate, but it is not only the general concordia expressed by the grant of the civic oak, but a more special concordia concerned with the issue of token coinage.

This does not however mean a return to the old view that SC appears by right, and is proof of the Senate's authority to issue aes at Rome. 97 Quite apart from Kraft's objections, there are several other indications that the senatorial reference on the aes was one of courtesy alone, and not of specific right. Perhaps the most significant is the fact that under Nero at least if not previously, the aes seems to have been struck in officinae that were at other times engaged in the production of gold and silver. 98 The imperial character of the aes with SC is underlined in other ways. On the restored aes of Titus and Domitian 99 the formula always referred directly to the act of the Emperor in restoring the pieces though SC was generally appended. Many validating countermarks were decidedly imperial: 100 AVG; IMP; IMP AVG; TIB; NCAPR; ΓΑΛΒΑ; the Caesar and Vespasian monograms, etc. Countermarks quoting the Senate's authority were confined to SPQR and SPR in the context of the Civil War propaganda. A specifically imperial reference in a coin type like Caligula's ADLOCVT COH 101 or Titus' ANNONA AVG 102 warranted the complete omission of any reference to the Senate, although the pieces clearly belonged to the same mint as the rest of the aes. The reverse type of SC inside a wreath is regularly used on the aes issues of Antioch on the Orontes 103 in the chief imperial province of the east, and its reference must still be to the Roman Senate. Nero's western aes struck in an imperial province at Lugdunum was always marked SC, 104 and so too were the issues of Galba in Spain and Gaul. In fact the Senate's role can hardly have exceeded the complimentary form. 105

The prominence given to SC certainly decreased markedly during the Julio-Claudian period. Whereas the Augustan moneyers used the letters as a distinct type, around which they set their names, Tiberius often substituted another reverse type and relegated SC to a comparatively unimportant place in the field. Under Nero and later emperors SC found a place only in the reverse field, and by the second century the letters became noticeably diminished in size. The whole process is undoubtedly symptomatic of the declining importance of the Senate.

Nero's aes without SC was the first aes to be struck at Rome for more than a decade, and this in itself would greatly facilitate any change in type and reference. The omission of SC from his first two issues in a.d. 63/64, shortly before he dropped the complimentary EXSC from the gold and silver and at a time when his relations with the senate had become considerably strained should, I believe, be regarded as a deliberate and calculated attempt to abandon a complimentary formula the reality of which had disappeared and the importance of which had considerably waned.

On Nero's gold and silver there is a comparable development. The issues of a.d. 54/55 to 59/60 have the type of the corona civica and the senatorial reference EXSC (Plate I, 2, 4, 10). The formula continues when the types are changed to Ceres, Roma and Virtus in a.d. 60/61 (Plate I, 11–14, 19, 20) but it is ultimately dropped in the reformed issues from a.d. 64 onward (Plate I, 22ff.). Kraft refers EXSC to the type, the corona civica, and when the type is changed he regards the continued use of EXSC as a "vestigial organ." Mattingly inverts the argument and suggests that EXSC cannot refer only to the corona civica because of its persistence when the new types were introduced. He sees a deliberate ambiguity suggesting "civilitas"—that the Senate had some part in the dated gold and silver issues. The distinction is a fine one, but the point is clear. A senatorial reference derived in part from the type persists as a complimentary reference when the type is changed, and is ultimately dropped. It is dropped about the same time as the issues of Nero's earliest aes—the two issues that omit SC.

Issue I of Nero's aes, the first complete aes issue in a range of types to omit SC during the Julio-Claudian period, consisted of copper asses and semisses—denominations which were indistinguishable from those already in circulation, and in which the only innovation was the omission of the traditional senatorial reference. But Issue II, similarly without SC, made a drastic break with previous monetary practice. Hitherto sestertii and dupondii alone had been struck in orichalcum but now for the first time a general orichalcum coinage was introduced for all the aes denominations. This was closely followed by Issue III which struck the same range of denominations in orichalcum with the same range of reverse types, but now had SC on all denominations and marks of value on the dupondii, asses, semisses and quadrantes. All the later issues of Nero's aes at both Rome and Lugdunum invariably included SC. The change in policy at this juncture, and the decision to include once more the traditional senatorial reference on the aes seems to be occasioned by a need to associate the Senate with the new and unfamiliar monetary system. It is probably no coincidence that SC was restored to Nero's aes in the same issue as the marks of value were introduced.

End Notes

85
Gnecchi, Medaglioni, pp. xxxii ff.
86
Gnecchi, Medaglioni p. xxxiii defines medallions as "i pezzi scelti in ogn; metallo emissi all infuori o al disopra semplice ed ordinaria monetazione."
87
Cf. H. Stuart Jones, Cambridge Ancient History X, 5.
88
Tacitus, Annals xiii 31; Suetonius, Nero 10; cf. Denis van Berchem Les distributions de blé et d'argent à la plèbe romaine sous l'empire (Geneva, 1939), pp. 148–49.
89
M. Grant, Roman Imperial Money (London, 1954), pp. 111 ff., from which the quotations in this section are taken. Cf. J. M. C. Toynbee, Roman Medallions, NS 5 (New York, 1944), pp. 15–16.
90
See above p. 59.
91
BMCRE I, Intro., p. 1.
92
Konrad Kraft, "S(enatus) C(onsulto)," JNG 1952, pp. 7–49.
93
C. H. V. Sutherland, "The Symbolism of the Early Aes Coinages under Augustus," RN 1965, pp. 94–109.
94
Aase Bay, "The Letters SC on Augustan Aes Coinage, JRS 1972, pp. 111–22.
95
RIC Claudius, 1–7 for the aurei and denarii; 68 for the asses. See Cat. 25f. (aurei), 56f. (denarii), 129ff. (sestertii), 196ff. (dupondii).
96
NC 1963, pp. 255–56.
97
As in Mattingly's earlier view, in BMCRE I, p. xvi "the control was certainly given to the Senate as witness its imposing mark of authority SC."
98
See Chapter 8.
99
BMCRE II, pp. 281 ff. A common form of legend is IMP T VESP AVG REST SC.
100
BMCRE I, pp. xxxviii–xliii.
101
BMCRE I Caligula, 33ff. Other than the pattern type Numa head asses of Augustus (BMCRE I 28), these sestertii of Gaius were the only aes before Nero that omitted all reference to the Senate. They are not different in style from the normal sestertii of Caligula with SC and must be the products of the same mint at Rome. Mattingly certainly seems to be correct in connecting them with the events described by Dio 59.2 when Caligula paid in full the 1,000 sestertii bequeathed to each praetorian under Tiberius' will and added the same sum again in his own name, distributing the money at a special parade. But the coins must commemorate the event and not have been presented at it. There is no reason to suppose that the issue was of the enormous size that 1,000 sestertii per praetorian would have required, and the issue was not confined to the year of the donative, as there are examples dated TRPOT, TRP III and TRP IIII PP.
102
BMCRE II Titus, 152ff.
103
W. Wruck, Die syrische Provinzialprägung, pp. 34–35.
104
Cf. Sutherland, Coinage in Roman Imperial Policy, p. 165.
105
Cf. H. Mattingly Roman Coins (London, 1928), p. 114.

5. ISSUES OF AES AT ROME

Sequence of the Issues

The identification of the aes without SC as the first two issues of aes at Rome, in conjunction with the knowledge that Nero assumed IMP as a praenomen during a.d. 66 provides the key for the arrangement of the issues of the aes at Rome. 1 Six principal stages can be distinguished, and each can be set in order in a progressive sequence. Each succeeding stage retains many features from the preceding issue, but is distinguishable from it by some major change or innovation.

Issue I consists of the copper asses, semisses and quadrantes without SC.

Issue II introduces the general orichalcum coinage of sestertii, dupondii asses and quadrantes—all without SC.

Issue III is a continuation of the general orichalcum coinage, but is distinguished by the addition of SC to all denominations and marks of value to the dupondii, asses, semisses and quadrantes.

Issue IV still has IMP as a cognomen, but is marked by its return to the more customary pattern of denominations with sestertii and dupondii in orichalcum, asses and quadrantes in copper, all without marks of value.

Issue V has sestertii and dupondii in orichalcum, and asses in copper with the same reverse types as in Issue IV, but is distinguished from that issue by the use of IMP as a praenomen.

Issue VI has the same range of denominations, but is distinguished by the use of the date TRP XIII on the sestertii and dupondii and by the use of a distinctive obverse legend on the copper asses.

Within each of these six aes issues and their principal subdivisions there are several minor variations in the form of obverse legend. Some elements in the titulature are abbreviated in different ways in the same issue, e.g., Germanicus is abbreviated to both GERM and GER, and Claudius is either given in full as CLAVDIVS or shortened to CLAVD. These minor differences often seem to have no special chronological significance for the sequence in which obverse dies were used within each issue but some forms at least seem to occur principally in one part of an issue, and to constitute the predominant form of obverse legend in use for a time. These minor differences may have been produced by individual engravers faced with the task of fitting a set legend neatly into a limited space. Alternatively, in some cases at least, the engravers may have received successive sets of instructions about the minutiae of the forms of abbreviation to be followed. The mint, however, certainly continued to use without discrimination all its available obverse dies, even though they may have had earlier forms of obverse legend, until there was a major change in the form of the emperor's obverse titulature.

End Notes

1
The complete list of varieties (with an indication of the substantive varieties in each issue) for all denominations will be found in the catalogue below.

Sestertii

Issue II was the first to include sestertii—those without SC. The principal reverse types were Adlocutio, Annona, Congiarium and Decursio. The three forms of obverse legend:

NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP;

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP

and less commonly

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP

do not seem to have had any special chronological significance.

Cat. 70–83. PLATES II–III.

Issue III had the reverse types of the second issue, now with SC, and some additional types with SC of the Arch, Ostia harbor and a new Decursio. In other denominations Issue III is defined by the use of marks of value. These sestertii had no marks of value, but the issue is defined by the parallel issue of dupondii, which closely reflects changes in the sestertii during Issues IV, V and VI. At the point where the dupondii drop the mark of value īī, they change their reverse type and introduce Roma and Janus temple; and there can be little doubt that the introduction of Roma and Janus temple instead of the earlier sestertius types marks the beginning of Issue IV.

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP was the most common form and must have been used throughout Issue III. It is occasionally found in Issue II and was still the predominant form in Issue IV. NERO CLAVD1VS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP and NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP seem to be early varieties as they were the usual forms in Issue II but never occur after Issue III. NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP on the other hand seems to be a later variant which at one time became the predominant form. It was never used on the sestertii without SC but was used extensively in this issue and is occasionally found with Roma and Janus temple sestertii of Issue IV also.

Cat. 84–134. Plates III–IV.

Issue IV had the reverse types of Roma and Janus temple instead of the previous wide range. Nero still had the cognominai IMP. The normal obverse legend was NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP, with NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP PP as a rare variant. The two views of the temple of Janus described in the catalogues as "door closed left" and "door closed right" were used throughout this issue but seem to have no special chronological significance. In fact they merely represent two different aspects of the same building. 2 Two forms of the Roma reverse type also were used throughout Issue IV. One showed Roma seated left holding a victory in her right hand and a parazonium in her left; the other showed her with a victory in her right hand but holding a spear upright in her left. The extremely rare sestertii with the cuirassed bust of Nero and the legend NERO CAESAR AVG IMP TR POT XI PPP were all struck from a single obverse die. 3 Nero's head is comparatively early; the obverse date falls in the year December a.d. 64/65; and the coins should certainly be placed at or near the beginning of Issue IV. It is fairly clear that soon after the sestertius reverse types were changed, a new obverse type was also contemplated; but only one obverse die was cut and put into use before the project was abandoned.

Cat. 135–154. Plate IV.

Issue V had a changed obverse legend, which now included IMP as a praenomen. The usual obverse legend was IMP NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TR P PP with the rarer variant IMP NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP PP. The two views of the temple of Janus and the two forms of the Roma reverse type were retained unchanged from the fourth issue.

Cat. 155–166. Plates IV–V.

Issue VI had a new legend with the tribunician date IMP NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP XIII PP. Some coins retained the reverse type of Roma holding victory r. and spear l. from Issue V, but most coins in this issue had modified and different versions of both the Roma and Janus temple type.

Cat. 167–174. Plate V.

The latest issue of sestertii, never issued in any numbers and with no substantive varieties, seems to have consisted of the rare coins dated TRP XIV, with the reverse types of Roma shield l. that had been used in Issue VI and of Victory l. holding a statuette of Minerva and a palm branch, derived from the same image as the reverse of the first Roman sestertii of Galba. 4

Cat. 175, 176.

End Notes

2
See p. 129 below.
3
I have made a further study of these coins in a forthcoming article "The Aes of Nero with Tribunician Dates."

Dupondii

Issue II was the first to include dupondii. These dupondii without SC had bare and laureate heads besides the radiate form that subsequently became the regular representation on the denomination at Rome. Five forms of obverse legend were used:

NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP;

NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP P;

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP;

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP P;

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP

but no special chronological significance can be attached to these varieties.

Cat. 177–188. Plates V–VII.

Issue III is distinguished by the addition of SC and the mark of value īī on the reverse. The legend MAC AVG was added to the formerly anepigraphic Macellum type.

It continued to use the reverse types of Victoria l. and Securitas, and added the further type of Victoria r.

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP

was the usual form.

NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP

and

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP

were probably early variants, as they were often used in the series without SC but not after the new representation of Victoria flying right was introduced, nor with the later types of Roma and Janus temple. NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP seems to have been the predominant form in the middle period of the issue, and it was still used occasionally in Issue IV with the new Roma and Janus temple types.

Cat. 189–209. Plates VII–VIII.

Issue IV is distinguished by the absence of the mark of value and a change of reverse types. The two new types of Roma and Janus temple, introduced at this stage, continue in one form or another up to the end of Nero's reign. As on the sestertii, the two views of the temple of Janus had no chronological significance. Initially the form used on the sestertii for both the Roma and Janus temple types was employed. To this early group at the beginning of the issue belong the rare dupondii with the laureate head (Plate XXIII, 210–212). This experimental obverse for the dupondii at Rome is closely parallel to the transient use of the cuirassed bust on sestertii at the beginning of Issue IV, and was as quickly abandoned.

Eventually the longer reverse legend PACE PR TERRA MARIQ PARTA IANVM CLVSIT was replaced by PACE PR VBIQ PARTA IANVM CLVSIT on the dupondii, and the type of Roma holding a victory and parazonium was replaced by the distinctive dupondius type of Roma holding a wreath. The earlier forms of both these types are never found with the praenominal IMP, whereas the later forms continued to be used in the subsequent issue after mid-a.d. 66. The usual obverse legend was NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP with NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP as a rare variant.

The general argument for the sequence of the reverse type in this issue is reinforced by the evidence of the overstrike in Paris (Plate XXII, p). A dupondius of this issue with the earlier Janus temple type that has the longer legend, is overstruck by the later Roma type with the wreath and parazonium.

Cat. 210–227. Plate VIII.

Issue V had a changed obverse legend to incorporate the praenomen IMP. Toward the end of the issue there is a new version of the Roma type which had been used for some time previously on the sestertii—that of Roma seated left with a victory in her right hand, but holding a spear instead of the parazonium in her left. This variety shares an obverse die with the normal Roma type of Issue V. It usually has the obverse legend of that issue, IMP NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP PP but one specimen has been noted with the legend IMP NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP XIII PP and this clearly suggests that the type was in use immediately before the legends were changed at the beginning of Issue VI.

Cat. 228–237. Plate VIII.

Issue VI had the tribunician date TRP XIII using the obverse legend IMP NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TR P XIII PP. The reverse types of Roma and Janus temple were still used but their details were changed slightly. The type of Roma holding a victory and spear, which had appeared on the dupondii at the end of Issue V, was used initially but soon replaced by the type of Roma holding a spear and resting her arm on a shield. The parallel Janus temple type followed closely the new representation that had appeared on the sestertii; as on the sestertii its reverse legend began at six instead of eight o'clock, but it was the shorter form, characteristic of the dupondius, PACE PR VBIQ PARTA IANVM CLVSIT.

Cat. 238–241. Plate IX.

End Notes

4
Ibid.

Asses

Issue I consisted of the copper asses without SC. Nero's head was invariably bare. Initially the anepigraphic Apollo reverse type was used, and its three forms of obverse legend

NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP;

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP; and

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM

TRP IMP contained all the major elements of the imperial titulature. These anepigraphic Apollo asses are extremely rare and the reverse type was soon modified to place part of Nero's titles PONTIF MAX TRP IMP PP as a reverse legend around the figure of Apollo. As the reverse legend of these asses now completed Nero's titulature, the obverse legends were shortened. Three forms were used:

NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMANIC

NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMAN and

NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMA.

Little significance can be attached to these variations, though one suspects that the obverse legend may have been shortened during the course of the issue. A second reverse type of GENIO AVGVSTI (without SC) was also used; introduced apparently toward the end of the issue, since examples are extremely rare. Its normal obverse legend was NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP with the rare variant NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP. A single PONTIF MAX TR P IMP PP Apollo copper As without SC has the full obverse legend NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP—a hybrid apparently struck from an obverse die that was originally engraved for the GENIO AVGVSTI reverse type.

Cat. 242–256. Plate IX.

Issue II consisted of orichalcum asses with the same reverse types of Apollo and Genius, without SC or any marks of value. The evidence of portraiture and weight shows that this group must be regarded as the earliest emission of asses in orichalcum. Nero's head was either laureate or radiate. The obverse legends were

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS with a laureate portrait principally used with the Apollo type,

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANIC and

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP with a radiate head, and only found with the Genius type. The issue was struck from at least five obverse and twelve reverse dies.

Cat. 257–261. Plates IX–X.

Issue III consisted of the main series of orichalcum asses which had SC and the mark of value ī. During the course of this issue there was a marked lowering of the weight standard of the orichalcum As, and it is interesting to note that coins of lower weight are generally found with later portraits. But although it is clear that the weight standard was being reduced, individual coins are struck al marco not al peso, and it is impossible to establish a sequence within the issue from a consideration of weights alone. Moreover, as the whole issue was very restricted in time, it is equally difficult to establish a sequence within the issue based on the development of portraiture. There are two principal forms of obverse legend: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMAN ICVS and NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP, both variously abbreviated, but these have no chronological significance. The former is particularly appropriate to the Apollo reverse and the latter to the Genius reverse. They were in fact generally confined to their own reverse types, and exceptions due to muling are comparatively rare. The imperial head appears laureate and radiate. In Issue II the laureate head was used with the Apollo type and the radiate head with the Genius type. But in Issue III both forms were used with both types indifferently. It looks as though the two representa- tions were continued from the preceding issue, but their original significance was lost. Neither form of portrait seems to have a specifically chronological significance. Both laureate and radiate heads are found equally on heavy and light asses and on slightly younger and slightly older portraits.

Cat. 262–276. Plate X.

Issue IV reverted to asses in copper which were struck in two new reverse types of Victory and Janus temple. They had no mark of value, but always had SC. As on the sestertii and dupondii, there were two distinct types of Janus temple but these have no chronological significance. Within this issue three chronological groups can be distinguished:

IV.A—the earliest coins with the long obverse legends

NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP and

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP, the Janus temple asses with the long form of reverse legend PACE PR TERRA MARIO PARTA IANVM CLVSIT.

IV.B—the middle group with the shortened obverse legend NERO CAESAR AVG GERM IMP.

IV.C—the latest group with the reverse legend of the Janus temple type abbreviated PACE PR VBIQ PARTA IANVM CLVSIT. There must have been a parallel issue of victory asses in both phase IV.B and IV.C but there is no distinctive feature about their reverse types to distinguish them in the same way as the Janus temple type.

Cat. 277–293. Plate X–XI.

Issue V had the praenomen IMP and used IMP NERO CAESAR AVG GERM retaining unchanged the reverse types from the latest group of the fourth issue.

Cat. 294–299. Plate XI.

Issue VI is marked by a new obverse legend IMP NERO CAESAR AVG GERMANIC which is found with a slightly modified form of the Janus temple type. Its legend starts at 6 instead of 8 o'clock, as on the final issues of sestertii and dupondii of the Janus temple type dated TRP XIII.

Cat. 300–302. Plate XI.

Semisses

Issue I included the rare semisses in copper without SC which followed closely the pattern of the copper asses without SC.

Cat. 303–307. Plate XII.

Issue III, which covered the general orichalcum coinage, included all the remaining semisses of Nero from Rome. The two reverse types of Roma and the gaming table were used throughout, although there was considerable variety in the reverse legends employed. In the first stage Nero's head was variously bare or laureate, and long forms of obverse legend were used, incorporating most of the elements in Nero's titulature. These forms varied considerably and many of the variants are known from a single obverse die. Very soon, however, the semisses adopted a shorter and more suitable form of obverse legend. Nero's head then was invariably laureate. The usual form of obverse legend was

NERO CAES AVG IMP with less common variants,

NERO CAESAR AVG IMP and

NERO CAE AVG IMP. In the first stage of this issue the mark of value S was sometimes omitted from the reverse—no doubt the engravers found the very small dimensions of an orichalcum semis die extremely crowded—but in the later stages of the issue S was invariably included.

Cat. 303–335. Plate XII.

Quadrantes

Nero's quadrantes have no obverse portraits and it is not possible to attribute them to the mints of Rome and/or Lugdunum on the grounds of bust truncation and the presence or absence of the Lugdunum globe. Mattingly argued that the smaller coins in orichalcum were undoubtedly of the Roman mint and suggested that the larger coins in copper might by analogy fall to Lugdunum. 5 But Mattingly's suggestion is not substantiated by their distribution.

In Italy both copper and orichalcum quadrantes are found, and the denomination is rarely found outside Italy. I have noted the following examples of finds:

COPPER ORICHALCUM
Helmet Owl Helmet Owl
Italy
Volterra 6 1
Ostia 7 1
Pompeii 8 1
Tiber 9 2 2
Tiber 10 12 29 30 37
Rome 11 1 1 1 1
Aquileia 12 one example–metal not specified
Luni 13 one example – metal not specified
Liri I 14 1 1
Liri II 15 1
Spain
Menorca 16 one example – metal not specified
Germany
Gegenbach 17 one example – metal not specified
Epfach 18 1
Pfünz 19 1

It is therefore virtually certain that both helmet and owl types in both copper and orichalcum were struck at the mint of Rome.

Mattingly further suggested 20 that if the larger coins too were assigned to Rome they should be placed before the orichalcum issue in the year a.d. 60 at the first celebration of the quinquennial games, but we cannot accept this alternative arrangement either. All the quadrantes must have been issued before mid-a.d. 66, as they never include the praenomen IMP among Nero's titles; and their issues closely followed the pattern of the asses at Rome up to that date. The quadrantes are known in copper without SC, in orichalcum without SC, in orichalcum with SC generally accompanied by a mark of value, and in copper with SC but without a mark of value. This closely follows the pattern of the earlier asses, and we must regard the quadrantes as forming part of the same series of issues.

The quadrans was certainly the lowest denomination to be issued by Nero. Elmer's view that there was a further denomination of a sescunx or half-quadrans with the same types as the quadrans but struck to half the weight standard, 21 is quite unjustified. Elmer recognized the existence of the orichalcum quadrantes which Gabrici first distinguished in 1895, 22 but thought that some of the small coins of the owl/branch and helmet/branch types (apparently those without any mark of value, though that is not clearly stated) constituted a further and lower denomination in copper—the sescunx. This view is open to a number of objections. The point at which Elmer divided the weights of these coins into quadrantes and half-quadrantes seems to be purely arbitrary. When the weights which he quoted are plotted in a frequency table there is not the slightest suggestion that the supposed halves had a point of concentration at or near half the point of concentration for the larger quadrantes. The mark of value ∴ show that the small coins which bear them were in fact quadrantes. Yet these coins with the mark of value are of the same size and weight standard and had the same obverse and reverse types as others which Elmer describes as half- quadrantes; and, except for the mark of value which was in any case tiny and often off flan, there would have been no means of distinguishing the supposed sescunx from the orichalcum quadrans. Of all the coins cited by Elmer, those which I have seen are struck in the same metal as the quadrantes with the mark of value. It is clear that Elmer failed to realize that there was an issue of orichalcum quadrantes without marks of value, but which otherwise used the same types, size of flan and weight standard as the previous marked issue of quadrantes.

Issue I included quadrantes in copper without SC, parallel to the asses and semisses in copper without SC.

Cat. 336–337. Plate XII.

Issue II consisted of the orichalcum quadrantes without SC and seems to have belonged to the same issue as that of the orichalcum asses without SC.

Cat. 338–340. Plate XII.

Issue III consisted of the orichalcum quadrantes with SC and, usually, the mark of value—again parallel to the Roman asses and semisses in orichalcum with the mark of value ī and S respectively. The mark of value ∴, however, does not always appear to have been used on the quadrantes. The reverse field below the olive branch where the mark of value was normally placed is sometimes worn, corroded or even off flan on surviving examples. On clear specimens, however, quadrantes with the reverse legend GER PM TR P IMP PP invariably have the mark of value, whereas quadrantes with PM TRP IMP PP sometimes have it but sometimes clearly omit it. This second form of reverse legend was the one used subsequently on the fourth issue of quadrantes in copper with SC, and it was undoubtedly the latest form of reverse legend on the orichalcum quadrantes. It is thus clear that the mint ceased to mark its orichalcum quadrantes with the sign of value during the later stages of the third issue.

Cat. 341–356. Plate XII.

Issue IV, the final issue, consisted of quadrantes in copper with SC but with no mark of value. This group appears to have been struck at the same time as the copper asses with SC of the Victory and Janus temple types. Initially the quadrantes were struck in the same two types of the owl/branch and the helmet/branch which had been used on the orichalcum quadrantes with SC, and had the same reverse legend PM TRP IMP PP, but at a later stage a new type of the owl/helmet was introduced. The series of quadrantes came to an end before mid-66, as they all show Nero's titles without the praenominal IMP.

Cat. 357–362. Plate XII.

End Notes

5
BMC RE I, p. clxxxif.
6
N Scav Ant 1955, P. 149.
7
Ostia Museum.
8
Antiquarium, Pompeii.
9
Museo Nazionale delle Terme, Rome.
10
Museo Capitolino, Rome.
11
C. E. King, "Quadrates from the River Tiber," NC 1975, pp. 85–87.
12
MSS. catalogue, Museo Archeologico, Aquileia.
13
AIIN 12–14 (1965–67), P. 178.
14
B. W. Frier and A. Parker, "Roman Coins from the River Liri. I," NC 1970, p. 96.
15
W. E. Metcalf, "Roman Coins from the River Liri. II," NC 1974, Ρ. 46. This coin cat. no. 362 has the obv. type of an owl and rev. type of a column.
16
NumHisp 1955 "Hallazgos Monetarios XII," 752, pp. 127–32.
17
Bissinger, Baden, 2nd ed. no. 116.
18
Kellner, Die römischen Fundmünzen aus dem nördlichen Teil von Rätien.
19
FRMD I.3, Mittelfranken 5040.
20
BMCRE I, p. clxxxii.
21
G. Elmer, "Die Kleinkupferprägung von Augustus bis Nero" NZ 1934, pp. 18–30.
22
RIN 1895, p. 364.

6. EARLIEST AES AT LUGDUNUM

General Character

The identification of the first aes issues at Lugdunum would give an invaluable key to the sequence of issues at the mint. Although the coinage at Lugdunum in some respects copies extensively the types and legends of Rome, in others it introduces its own forms which give the issues a distinctive character. It has been suggested that some of the aes without SC were intended as pattern coinage for the new mint, but the details of their types were thoroughly Roman and the issue must be regarded as the earliest aes of Nero struck in Rome. There is however a small group of aes in all four denominations which combines features otherwise found exclusively at Rome or Lugdunum. Several examples have been found in Gaul, Britain and the Netherlands and the group clearly had a western circulation. It has no place in the internal development of the coinage at Rome, but fits naturally at the beginning of the Lugdunum series and can with confidence be regarded as the first issue struck at the reopened mint of Lugdunum.

Sestertii

The sestertii combining features of Rome and Lugdunum are:

Cat. 401

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP Head laur. r. with globe and aegis in front.

Rev.: ADLOCVT COH in exergue. SC l. and r. in field.

Nero standing l. on platform accompanied by Praetorian Prefect addressing three soldiers.

Vatican 30.85 gm. A601 P601

Cat. 402

Obv.: As 401.

Rev.: ANNONA AVGVSTI CERES. SC in exergue.

Ceres sitting l. holding torch and ears of corn; before her, Annona standing with a cornucopiae.

BM 1 28.00 gm. A602 P602
BM 27.59 gm. A603 P603
Walters, 1961 A603 P603
ANS 26.97 gm. A604 P604
Egger XLV, 949 A605 P605

The globe is always found on sestertii at Lugdunum, but was never used at Rome. The aegis is frequently shown with right facing portraits of Nero on sestertii from Rome, but except for this issue, never occurs at Lugdunum. One of the British Museum sestertii of this group from Roach Smith's collection was found at London Bridge.

Dupondii

The dupondii combining features otherwise found exclusively at Rome or Lugdunum are:

Cat. 490

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP P

Head rad. r., with globe at point of bust.

Rev.: MAC AVG. SC l. and r. of steps.

Front view of Macellum Magnum.

Vienna 14.50 gm. *A701 P701
Berlin 16.40 gm. *A701 P701
Paris 13.91 gm. *A701 P701
Lisbon *A701 P701
Hall 16.82 gm. *A701 P701
Glasgow C3758 15.09 gm. *A701 P701
Manchester 13.80 gm. A702 P702
Stockholm A710 P702

Plate XIV

Cat. 491

Obv.: As 490.

Rev.: SECVRITAS AVGVSTI. SC l. and r. in field, īī in exergue. Securitas seated r. on throne. l. holding scepter in hand, r. elbow resting against throne. In front, garlanded and lighted altar; against it, a lighted torch resting on a bucranium.

BM 338 13.91 gm. A703 P703
Oxford 10.29 gm. A703 P703
Mayenne 2 A702 P704
Mayenne A704 P705

Cat. 492

Obv.: As 490.

Rev.: VICTORIA AVGVSTI. SC l. and r. in field, īī in exergue. Draped Victory walking l., r. holding wreath, l. a palm. Beneath, line indicating the ground.

Oxford 14.90 gm. A705 P706
Madrid A702 P707
Blackburn 16.78 gm. A702 P707
Paris A702 P708
Mayenne A704 P709
Mayenne A704 P709
Mayenne A704 P710
Mayenne A706 P711
Mayenne A707 P712
York 3

Plate XVI

Cat. 493

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP

Head rad. r. with globe at point of bust.

Rev.: As 490.

BM 14.56 gm. A708 P713
London G. 13.77 gm. A709 P713
Cahn 61, 772 A710 P714
Wulzinger 4 13.53 gm. A711 P715
Almirall 12.44 gm. A714 P733

Plate XIV

Plate XIV

Cat. 494

Obv.: As 493.

Rev.: As 491.

Oxford 13.35 gm. A710 P717
BM 12.48 gm. A708 P716
Hague 13.5 gm. A701 P718
Blackburn 15.88 gm. A712 P719
Blackburn 12.55 gm. A710 P717
Mayenne A701 P718
Private Coll., 12.96 gm. A701 P721
London 5
Condé 6 14.57 gm.
London G. 19.45 gm. A712 P720

Plate XV

Plate XV

Plate XV

Plate XVI

Cat. 495

Obv.: As 493.

Rev.: As 492.

Glasgow 112 13.51 gm. A713 P722
Abbas 7 A713 P722
Blackburn 13.80 gm. A701 P723
Rome, Capitol A701 P723
London G. 13.80 gm. A713 P722
Webb 13.59 gm. A714 P724
Mayenne A715 P725
Mayenne A715 P726
Mayenne A716 P727
Mayenne A717 P728
Mayenne A717 P729
Manchester 14.32 gm. A717 P730
Condé 11.20 gm.
Condé 12.50 gm.
Condé 12.56 gm.
Condé 12.79 gm.
Condé 13.60 gm.
Condé 13.71 gm.

Plate XV

Plate XV

Cat. 496

Obv.: As 493.

Rev.: VICTORIA AVGVSTI. SC l. and r. in field, īī in exergue. Victory draped flying l., r. holding a wreath, l. a palm; r. leg forward clear of drapery.

BM 16.50 gm. A712 P731
Cirencester 8 A711 P732
Mayenne A711 P732

Plate XV

Plate XV

The obverse combines the radiate head, normal on dupondii at Rome but not otherwise found at Lugdunum, with the globe that is invariably found at Lugdunum but never at Rome. Details of the reverse types also combine features of both Rome and Lugdunum. Two forms of the Victoria type are used. One shows Victoria flying left with no ground line, and with her left leg forward clear of her drapery (Plate XV, 496)—the form of Victoria flying left invariably used at Rome (Plate VII, 185). The other shows Victoria walking left on a ground line with drapery billowing back from her left leg— the distinct Lugdunum variety not used at Rome.

Fourteen of these dupondii were found at Mayenne 9 and seven at Condé sur Aisne; one was found in London and another was probably found at Cirencester. With one single exception, all the pieces that I have noted belong to collections in the western provinces. Like the asses in orichalcum and copper described below, these dupondii combine features otherwise found exclusively at Rome or Lugdunum, and certainly circulated in the western provinces.

Altogether at least thirty-four reverse dies are used with eighteen obverse dies. In several cases different reverse types share obverse dies—a phenomenon which is seen repeatedly in all Nero's aes issues at both Rome and Lugdunum. It is interesting to note that several of the dies remained in use after a serious flaw had developed (see Plate XVI, 492 and XV, 495(1)).

A 701 P 701 Macellu m
P 718 Securitas
P 721 Securitas
P 723 Victoria
A 70a P 702 Macellum
P 704 Securitas
P 707 Victoria
P 708 Victoria
A 703 P 703 Securitas
A 704 P 705 Securitas
P 709 Victoria
P 710 Victoria
A 705 P 706 Victoria
A 706 P 711 Victoria
A 707 P 712 Victoria
A 708 P 713 Macellum
A 709 P 716 Securitas
A 710 P 714 Macellum
P 717 Securitas
A 711 P 715 Macellum
P 732 Victoria
A 712 P 719 Securitas
P 720 Securitas
P 731 Victoria
A 713 P 722 Victoria
A 714 P 724 Victoria
A 715 P 725 Victoria
P 726 Victoria
A 716 P 727 Victoria
A 717 P 728 Victoria
P 729 Victoria
P 730 Victoria

Fig. 3. Dupondii Lugdunum Issue L-III

The dupondii themselves can be subdivided into three distinct chronological stages: 1) in the first group, the two reverse dies of VICTORIA AVGVSTI have the Roman type of Victory (P731 and P732). One of SECVRITAS AVGVSTI dies has the type of Securitas naked to the waist (P720) which is not otherwise found at Lugdunum, though it sometimes occurs at Rome. Both the obverse dies have a globe at the tip of the bust, but like the orichalcum asses of Lugdunum do not have a very distinct Lugdunum truncation; 2) the reverse dies of the second group all have types that subsequently become the regular Lugdunum forms. The obverse dies have a more developed Lugdunum truncation than the first group but the characteristic Lugdunum M is only slightly indicated and the line of the truncation still resembles that of the aes at Rome; 3) the third group continues with the characteristic Lugdunum forms of reverse types. Its obverse dies are, however, far closer to those of the fully developed issues at Lugdunum and the bust truncation is shown in a bolder manner.

The obverse portraits of the first two groups closely resemble those of the orichalcum asses at Lugdunum, and can be regarded as contemporary with that issue. The fully developed portraiture of the third group suggests that it belongs to the same period as the rare copper asses with mark of value ī.

End Notes

*
after being recut. For prior use see Cat. 494 and 495.
1
Found at London Bridge c. 1840.
2
This coin and the other examples in the Mayenne Musée were found in the river bed at Mayenne in 1864.
3
Found in York in 1925.
4
R. Ball Sale 6 (Berlin, February 9, 1932), 1055.
5
Shown at the British Museum in 1957.
6
RN 1969, pp. 76–130.
7
Found in London in 1956 on the site of Bucklersbury House, cf. Ant J 1962, p. 40.
8
Probably found in Cirencester.
9
There are more dupondii at Mayenne with radiate head of Nero and a globe at the point of his bust truncation, but the others have been excluded from the die catalogue because of their worn state.

Orichalcum Asses

Although most of Nero's orichalcum asses were struck at Rome and do not seem to have circulated very far outside Italy, one small group certainly circulated in the western provinces and constituted a short issue from Lugdunum. It consisted of the following varieties:

Cat. 537

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANI

Head laur. r. with a globe at point of bust truncation.

Rev.: PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP. SC l. and r. in field, ī in exergue.

Nero, laur. in the robes of Apollo citharoedus walking r., l. holding lyre r. playing it.

Vienna 6.92 gm. A801 P801
Herts County A801 P801
Frost 10 A801 P801

Cat. 538

Obv.: As 537.

Rev.: GENIO AVGVSTI. SC l. and r. in field, ī in exergue. Genius standing l., l. holding cornucopiae, r. patera over lighted altar.

Paris 8.63 gm. A802 P802
BM 11 6.85 gm. A801 P803
Cirencester 12 A801 P803
London G. A801 P802

Plate XVIII

Cat. 539

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANIC

Head laur. l.

Rev.: As 537.

Vienna 7.25 gm. A803 P804
BM 9.65 gm. A803 P805
Abbas 13 A803 P804
Hague 6.25 gm. A803 P806
Oxford A803
Dumfries 14 A803 P804

Plate XVII

Cat. 540

Obv.: As 539.

Rev.: As 538.

Paris 7.35 gm. A803 P802

Plate XVIII

The mark of value ī is regularly found on Nero's orichalcum asses at Rome but not normally used on asses of Lugdunum. The laureate head was regularly used on the later orichalcum at Rome and was retained when the mint subsequently changed to the production of copper asses of the Victory and Janus temple types, whereas Lug- dunum copper asses invariably had the bare head of Nero. In this group, however, the asses with the right facing portrait have an unmistakable Lugdunum globe; and while the left facing heads have no globe they clearly show a bust truncation that later developed into the characteristic Lugdunum form, and the variety is die-linked to the right facing head with the globe. In marked contrast to the other varieties of orichalcum asses this group is not represented in the major Italian collections, and several of the specimens cited have a probable or certain provenance in the west.

The globe on the asses looks as though it may have been an ungainly final C of the obverse legend NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANIC which became attached to the front of the bust truncation and which was completed into a globe by the engraver for the sake of neatness. Its method of attachment is certainly different from that of the later Lugdunum series. It may possibly mark the beginning of the characteristic Lugdunum globe as an engraver's mistake that was promptly converted into a mint mark.

End Notes

10
Found in London in 1956 on the site of Bucklersbury House, cf. Ant J 1962, p. 40.
11
Found at London Bridge in 1840.
12
Probably found in Cirencester.
13
Found in London in 1956 on the site of Bucklersbury House.
14
Probably found in N. Britain.

Copper Asses with ī

A further hybrid group, also very rare, which closely follows the orichalcum asses at Lugdunum is the issue of copper asses with the mark of value ī:

Cat. 541

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS

Head bare r., with small globe at point of bust truncation.

Rev.: PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP. SC l. and r. in field, ī in exergue.

Nero, laur., in the flowing robes of Apollo citharoedus standing r., l. holding cithara, r. playing it.

Copenhagen 10.15 gm. A804 P807
Mayenne A804 P808
Mayenne A804 P808
Mayenne A805 P808
Brussels 15

Plate XVIII

Cat. 542

Obv.: As 541 but head bare l.

Rev.: As 541.

BM 237 11.31 gm. A806 P809
Paris 11.15 gm. A806 P810
Nijmegen 16 A806 P810
Nijmegen 17 A806 P810
Mayenne A807 P811

Plate XVIII

Α 801 P 801 Apollo
P 803 Genius
A 802 P 802 Genius
A 803 P 804 Apollo
P 805 Apollo
T 806 Apollo
A 804 P 807 Apollo
A 805 P 808 Apollo
A 806 P 809 Genius
P 810 Genius
A 807 P 811 Genius

Fig. 4. Orichalcum and Copper Asses Lugdunum Issue L-III and Transitionalissue

These coins are quite regular in style and fabric and can hardly be dismissed as unorthodox imitations. They have the red hue of copper asses, and the metal of the British Museum specimen has been shown to be copper by spectrographic analysis. Except for these rare pieces, the mark of value is found on Nero's asses in orichalcum alone.

Nero's head is bare, as always on the Lugdunum copper asses; it has the characteristic bust truncation of the Lugdunum mint; and the tapering elongation of the bust is terminated by a small globe— the same sort of treatment that can be seen on several of the earlier copper asses at Lugdunum. 18 The reverse always has SC whereas copper asses at Rome of the Apollo type never do. The reverse legend is PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP—the Lugdunum form, while Rome always has PONTIF MAX TR P IMP PP on the copper Apollo asses. The obverse legend is NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS— the common Lugdunum form which is not found on the Roman copper asses, and the letters of the obverse legend are executed in the bolder Lugdunum manner. The heads are rather small; full use is not made of the obverse field inside the lettering; and the hair is treated in a rather more formal way than in the fully developed Lugdunum style—peculiarities that can sometimes be seen in the earlier stages of the normal series at Lugdunum. 19

The only distinctly Roman feature of the coins is the mark of value on the reverse. This is, however, no justification for Mattingly's attribution to Rome, 20 when the characteristic truncation of the bust, the globe and the other details of style, type and content belong to Lugdunum, and the evidence of finds clearly shows that they circulated in the western provinces. Of the ten examples known to date, four were found at Mayenne, and two at Nijmegen.

Although it is paralleled by the mark of value īī on some dupondii, the mark ī on these asses is essentially illogical at Lugdunum. These copper asses were of closely similar fabric, the same weight and size as the earlier copper asses already in circulation in the west. Orichalcum asses had not been issued in large numbers at Rome, and, except for the rare issue described above, no orichalcum asses seem to have circulated in the west. Yet the group does give an additional proof that orichalcum asses were of the same value as the copper ones in spite of their different size and weight; it confirms the evidence of the rare western orichalcum asses that the mint at Lugdunum originally copied its reverse type from the orichalcum asses of Rome (not from the copper asses without SC of the anepigraphic or PONTIF MAX TR P IMP PP types); and it forms an issue that readily accounts for the transition from the orichalcum asses at Rome to the normal copper asses of the Apollo type at Lugdunum.

End Notes

15
Published by M. Thirion, CENB 1965, pp. 14–15.
16
Found at Hunnerberg, Nijmegen.
17
Local find acquired by the Rijksmuseum G.M. Kam in 1969.
18
Cf. Plate XVIII, 542, 544.
19
Cf. Plate XVIII, 542.
20
BMCRE I, p. 245, 237.

Orichalcum Semisses

The orichalcum semisses of this group are:

Cat. 604

Obv.: NERO CLAV CAESAR AVG

Head laur. r. with globe at tip of bust.

Rev.: CER QVIN ROM CON. SC in exergue.

A table seen from front and right. On it, an urn l., a wreath r.

BM 3.42 gm. A901 P901
ANS 3.63 gm. A901 P901
Madrid A901 P901
Paris 3.20 gm. A901 P901
Paris 3.10 gm. A901 A901/Brockage
Corbel 3.94 gm. A901 P901

Plate XX

The usual semisses from Rome are struck in orichalcum, while those from Lugdunum are in copper. This rare group in orichalcum has the laureate head regularly used at Rome, but does not have the Roman mark of value and it has the Lugdunum globe at the base of the obverse bust truncation. Although there is no evidence of provenance, the hybrid Rome/Lugdunum character is similar to that of the dupondii and asses discussed above, and there is no doubt that they must belong to the same context.

Context of the Issue

The general character of this earliest issue of aes at Lugdunum connects it with the latter part of the general orichalcum coinage at Rome i.e., with Issue III of the aes. The asses and semisses of this Lugdunum group are in orichalcum not in copper, and the issue of these denominations in orichalcum was restricted to Issue II and III at Rome. All the denominations of this Lugdunum group have SC and this is first introduced to the aes at Rome in Issue III. The dupondii and asses of this Lugdunum group have īī and ī, and these marks of value are found at Rome only in Issue III.


7. ISSUES OF AES AT LUGDUNUM

Sequence of the Issues

The aes at Lugdunum is divided into two broad chronological groups by Nero's use of the IMP as a cognomen until mid-66 and as a praenomen thereafter; and the identification of the first aes issued at Lugdunum provides the additional key needed to establish the sequence of the five stages that can be distinguished at this mint. The chronology of these five stages corresponds with four of the issues that have been distinguished for the aes at Rome. These stages at Lugdunum are denoted as Issues L-III, L-IV A, L-IVB, L-V and L-VI with the distinctive prefix L, but using the the same numbering as the parallel Rome Issues III, IV, V and VI. There were no issues at Lugdunum corresponding to Issues I and II of the aes at Rome.

Issue L-III was the first issue of aes at Lugdunum. It consists of the sestertii, dupondii, asses and semisses in orichalcum that have been described in Chapter 6, coins which combine features normally peculiar to Rome with details that later characterize the series at Lugdunum.

Issue L-IVA is marked by the return to the earlier Julio-Claudian pattern of aes denominations, with the sestertii and dupondii in orichalcum and the asses and semisses in copper. It is distinguished by early features, different for each denomination. The sestertii have a long angular bust truncation and a small globe; the dupondii retain the mark of value 17 from Issue L-III; the asses retain the obverse legends of asses of Issue L-III; and the semisses follow the obverse legends of the asses.

Issue L-IVB consists of the same range of denominations, still with IMP as a cognomen, but now characterized by fully developed Lugdunum forms of obverse portraiture and reverse type.

Issue L-V has the same range of denominations with the same reverse types but is distinguished by its use of IMP as a praenomen.

Issue L-VI can be distinguished on the sestertii and dupondii by subsequent modifications of some features of coins with the praenomen IMP. For example Securitas dupondii which have SC in the field in Issues L-III to L-V transfer it to the exergue in Issue L-VI. Within these issues there are additional varieties of obverse legends. There seems to have been a certain latitude allowed to individual engravers in the precise forms of terminal abbreviations employed. For example, NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP P and NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP were used in Issues L-III, L-IVA and L-IVB of the dupondii. IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TR P PP and IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TR POT PP were both used in Issues L-V and L-VI of the dupondii. These minor varieties of abbreviation cannot therefore in themselves have had any chronological significance. There was, however, a general tendency, seen in the sequence of the semisses, increasingly to abbreviate the components of the imperial titulature. PONTIF MAX gave way to PONT MAX and further to P MAX.

A longer form of abbreviation may sometimes have been more appropriate to the broader flan of a larger denomination, and have been used later than a shorter abbreviation on a smaller coin. A curious overstrike in the British Museum 1 shows that IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TRP PP was used on asses before IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONT MAX TRP PP was used on some sestertii. The overstrike has:

Obv.: (IMP NERO CAE)SAR AVG PONT MAX (TRPOT PP)

Head laureate l. globe.

Struck from a sestertius die over a reverse of the As type of victory carrying a shield.

Rev.: SC l. and r. in field.

A triumphal arch. Struck from a sestertius die over the obverse of an As reading (IMP NERO CAES)AR AVG P MAX (TRP PP) (Plate XXII, o).

There can be little doubt that it was an ordinary copper As of the Victory type overstruck by a pair of sestertius dies, perhaps as a trial striking.

End Notes

1
This coin was found in the breakwater behind the Kaite opposite Isleworth Town in the gravel, August 1839, and was given to the British Museum by C. Roach Smith.

Sestertii

Issue L-III is distinguished by the use of the aegis that was often used on sestertii at Rome together with the globe that eventually became the Lugdunum mint mark. The obverse legend NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TR P IMP PP was taken directly from the contemporary sestertii at Rome, and so too were the reverse types of Adlocutio and Annona.

Cat. 401–402.

Issue L-IVA had no aegis and is distinguished by the small neat version of the Lugdunum globe which is placed at the end of a long angular termination to the bust truncation. This treatment of the globe must have a chronological significance because it is paralleled on the dupondii where Issue L-IVA is additionally distinguished by the mark of value īī, and on the copper asses where Issue L-IVA is additionally distinguished by its own obverse legend. The validity of this distinction for the sestertii is reinforced by the higher weight standard to which sestertii of Issue L-III and L-IVA were struck. Most of them weigh between 27 and 29 gm. A few sestertii of Issue L-IVB were struck to this standard, but most of them, as the subsequent sestertii of Issues L-V and L-VI, fall between 23 and 26 gm.

The reverse types of Adlocutio and Annona were continued from Issue L-III and the types of Decursio, Roma and the Arch were added, all copied directly from the types used at Rome, and treated in much the same way as at Rome.

Cat. 403–414. Plates XII–XIII.

Issue L-IVB had a large globe attached to the bust of a more elegant and natural neck termination. The general treatment of the obverse portraits was more spirited, and showed much the same stage of development as the dupondii and asses of Issue L-IVB. To the reverse types of the second issue were added two new ones of the Harbor at Ostia, and the Temple of Janus. Both were ultimately derived from types at Rome, but the prototypes were not copied as closely as in L-III and L-IVA. The Temple of Janus was shown in a more decorative way than at Rome; the Harbor at Ostia was represented in a bolder and more schematic fashion with an altered reverse legend.

Cat. 415–429. Plate XIII.

Issue L-V is distinguished from the preceding issue by its use of the praenomen IMP. There were several varieties of obverse legend. From the dupondii and semisses it appears that the abbreviation of Potestate into POT or P had no chronological significance, but that in other respects the imperial titles were progressively abbreviated during the course of the issue. Sestertii with the longest form IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONTIF MAX TRIB POT PP had a comparatively early portrait (Plate XIII, 432) not very different from those in the third issue. It was comparatively rare and soon gave way to the commoner form

IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONT MAX TR POT PP and its rare variant

IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONT MAX TR P PP.

Cat. 430–458. Plates XIII–XIV.

Issue L-VI has the imperial titles abbreviated further to IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TR POT PP;

IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TR P PP;

IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P M TR POT PP and IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P M TR P PP.

Cat. 459–489. Plate XIV.

Dupondii

Issue L-III combined the radiate head normal on dupondii at Rome with the globe and bust truncation characteristic of Lug- dunum. The Securitas and Victoria types had the mark of value īī in the exergue, but the Macellum type, which was demonstrably contemporary, had no mark of value, probably because the projecting steps at the base of the crowded design left no room.

Cat. 490–496. Plates XIV–XVI.

Issue L-IVA had a laureate instead of the radiate crown on the obverse. Otherwise it continued to use the same obverse legends and reverse types as the first issue. The Securitas and Victoria types again had the mark of value īī and, as in the first issue, common obverse dies show that the Macellum type was struck concurrently with them.

Cat. 497–511. Plate XVI.

Issue L-IVB no longer had the marks of value in the exergue of its Securitas and Victoria types. Other features remained unchanged, and it used the same range of obverse legends as in Issue L-IVA.

Cat. 512–518. Plates XVI–XVII.

Issue L-V had a new range of obverse legends giving Nero IMP as a praenomen. The usual form was IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TR P PP. Occasionally the alternative from IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TR POT PP was used instead, but this seems to have been a variant without any chronological significance. The reverse types of Securitas and Victoria were retained unchanged from the preceding issue.

Cat. 519–526. Plate XVII.

Issue L-VI had SC in the exergue of the Securitas type, not in the field. There are no Victoria dupondii with SC in the exergue, but it is clear that the ordinary Victoria type was struck concurrently with the new form of the Securitas type. Several Victoria dupondii share obverse dies with Securitas dupondii that have SC in the exergue; and in one case the development of an obverse die flaw proves that the Victoria dupondius (Plate XVII, 534) was struck later than the Securitas dupondius with SC in the exergue (Plate XVII, 533).

Cat. 527–536. Plate XVII.

Asses

Issue L-III consisted of the rare orichalcum asses with the mark of value ī and a globe or Lugdunum form of bust truncation.

Cat 537–540. Plates XVII–XVIII.

A transitional group between Issues L-III and L-IVA is distinguishable in the rare group of copper asses with the mark of value ī. These coins are struck in copper like the other asses of L-IVA but have the mark of value ī which is otherwise found only on the orichalcum asses of Issue L-III.

Cat. 541–542. Plate XVIII.

Issue L-IVA consisted of Apollo type copper asses, without a mark of value. It retained the obverse legend of the first issue NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS. The form NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICV was a rare variant due to careless spacing by an engraver. The rare asses of the Victory, Janus temple, Ara Pacis and Genius types with this obverse legend never constitute substantive varieties, and seem to be hybrids due to the continued use of a limited number of these obverse dies into the next issue.

Cat. 543–551. Plate XVIII.

Issue L-IVB had new forms of obverse legend

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP P

and

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP

and four substantive reverse types of Ara Pacis, Genius, Janus temple and Victory. Occasional examples are recorded of the new form of obverse legend with copper asses of the Apollo type, but these never constitute a substantive variety, and seem to be hybrids produced by the continued use of a limited number of reverse dies from Issue L-IVA after the new types of Issue L-IVB had been introduced. There seems to be no important chronological distinction between the various abbreviations of obverse legend, and the different forms seem to be determined by the engraver's ability to fit the legend into the space available.

Cat. 552–579. Plates XVIII–XIX.

Issue L-V had a new range of obverse legends to give Nero IMP as a praenomen:

IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONTIF MAX TRIB POT PP

IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TR POT PP

IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TR P PP

IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TR P P

IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P M TR POT PP and

IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P M TR P PP.

The third is by far the most common form. The first is extremely rare; its lettering is small and neat and the legend occurs with early portraits very similar to those of the third issue. One suspects that this long form of legend was tried out immediately after Nero assumed the praenomen, but was soon abandoned because it was too long. Other variations in the abbreviations of MAX or M, POT or P seem to have been used without any chronological significance when the engraver had difficulty in spacing the legend.

Cat. 580–601. Plate XIX.

Issue L-VI of copper asses cannot be distinguished by objective criteria as in some other denominations. But the evidence of developed portraiture suggests that a proportion of the Victory asses at least are contemporary with Issue L-VI of the dupondii. Although it is true that Victory asses constitute 75% of Lugdunum asses found in the west, it is only among asses with the praenomen IMP that the numerical superiority of the Victory type emerges. This strongly suggests that the Lugdunum mint may have continued to issue asses of the Victory type after it had ceased to strike the other reverse types of Issues L-IV and L-V. We may therefore not unreasonably postulate a final issue of asses at Lugdunum which used the reverse type of Victory.

Cat. 602, 603.

Semisses

The classification of Lugdunum semisses has hitherto been singularly confused by the failure of earlier numismatists to distinguish them from the rare copper semisses struck at Rome, the normal orichalcum semisses of Rome and the unofficial copies of Lugdunum semisses. Although Mattingly and Sydenham correctly distinguished the Lugdunum group in the British Museum, many of the varieties quoted in the RIC and the footnotes to the BMCRE I merely perpetuate the confusion of earlier writers.

Issue L-VI consisted of the rare semisses in orichalcum with a globe at the top of Nero's bust.

Cat. 604. Plate XX.

Issue L-IVA consisted of semisses in copper with the obverse legend NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS. This is the form of obverse legend used on copper asses of Issue L-IVA. This issue of semisses was struck in the two types of Roma seated left on a cuirass and of the table commemorating the Certamen Quinquennale—two types which are used in each succeeding issue.

Cat. 605–609. Plate XX.

Issue L-IVA consisted of semisses in copper with shorter abbreviations of the title Germanicus.

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMAN

gave way to

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMA

and was eventually replaced by

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM

the usual form of obverse legend in this issue.

Cat. 610–619. Plate XX.

Issue L-V consisted of semisses in copper with IMP in the praenominal position among Nero's titles. Some semisses in this group had far more of the imperial titles on the obverse and consequently fewer titles carried over to the reverse of the Roma type. PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP and CER QVINQ ROM CON were undoubtedly the earliest forms of reverse legend as they alone were carried over from the third issue. This in turn suggests that the obverse legend IMP NERO CAESAR AVG, the sole form with which these two reverse legends are found in Issue L-V, must have been the earliest form of obverse legend in this issue. The chronological development was thus one in which the components of the imperial titulature were increasingly transferred from the reverse to the obverse and in the process the titles of the obverse legend became increasingly abbreviated.

This issue seems to have closely followed L-IVB. There is no sharp break in the presentation of imperial titulature; the early portraits are close to those of the third issue; and

IMP NERO CAESAR PONTIF MAX TRIB POT PP and

IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONT MAX TRIB POT PP

seem to have been characteristic of the first emissions of sestertii, dupondii and asses with the praenomen IMP.

Cat. 620–633. Plate XX.


8. MINT ORGANIZATION

Organization of Mints into Officinae

Roman and Byzantine mints from the mid-third to the eighth century a.d. are known to have been divided into a number of officinae or workshops, and most coins of that period bear the mark or number of the officina in which they were produced. 1 The purpose of the officina system was clearly to divide the work of each mint between a number of responsible divisions of manageable proportions, and to exercise a degree of administrative control over the coins produced by the different divisions. The principal purpose of any such organization would be lost if the mint authority was not able to apportion blame for any lapse from the standards for metal, weight and workmanship which it had laid down. If the mint inspectors were able to distinguish easily the coins of different officinae, so too, in theory at least, should the modern numismatist. First century coinages are not labelled with any explicit officina numbers, nor apparently with any privy marks. The sole distinguishing features, which can have been used to differentiate officinae, are varieties in obverse legend and bust treatment or in reverse types.

Kraay has recently tried to establish the distinguishing characteristics of Galba's officinae by studying the die relationships of the sestertii. 2 Such a die study clearly shows the physical connections between whole blocks of die-linked coins and often solves difficult problems of mint attribution; but we cannot safely postulate that a die-linked group of coins was necessarily produced by a single officina. 3 Officinae were essentially subdivisions of a mint and not separate establishments in different locations which would constitute independent or branch mints. The interchange of dies on a large scale between officinae of the same establishment is thus a very real possibility, whereas the interchange of dies between mints in different places can only have taken place under the most exceptional circumstances. Grierson has noted several obverse die links between the marked officinae of Basiliscus and Marcus, Zeno and Leo Caesar, Leo II and Zeno; 4 Pearce has noted numerous die links between the marked officinae of eastern mints in the fourth century; 5 Bastien has noted an obverse die link between folies of the Ist and 2nd officinae at Lyons under Constantius Chlorus; 6 Gricourt has noted an obverse die link between the 2nd and 3rd officinae at Lyons under Probus; 7 and Woodward has noted several obverse die links between the reverse types that seem to mark the six distinct officinae in the coinage of Pertinax. 8 Nor can we necessarily suppose that each officina will display a distinctive style in its treatment of the details of obverse portraiture or of reverse types, as Mattingly suggested. 9 While each officina may have had its own establishment of engravers, the officinae were, after all, part of the same mint and the engraving of dies may equally well have been carried out centrally for the whole establishment. 10

There is a bewilderingly rich variety of obverse and reverse legends and types in the coinages of Nero. But once it is recognized that some of these varieties are the distinctive features of different mints; that others have a chronological significance and characterize a particular issue; and that there is a limited number of substantive varieties in each issue at each mint, a clear and recurrent pattern emerges which enables us to determine the officina arrangement.

End Notes

1
Officina numbers first appear on the millenial issue of Philip in a.d. 248. See R. A. G. Carson, "System and Product in the Roman Mint," Essays in Roman Coinage presented to Harold Mattingly (Oxford, 1956), pp. 235ff. See also S. K. Eddy, The Minting of Antoniniani a.d. 238–249 and the Smyrna Hoard, ANSNNM 156 (New York, 1967), pp. 117ff. for a discussion of a possible reason for the overt identification of officinae.
2
C. M. Kraay, The Aes Coinage of Galba, ANSNNM 133 (New York, 1956).
3
See my review of Kraay, ANSNNM 133 in NC 1957, pp. 269–73.
4
SM July 1961, pp. 1–8.
5
Cf. RIC IX, p. 230 note to 67 (c).
6
SM Nov. 1960, pp. 75–77.
7
SM Feb. 1968, pp. 5–8.
8
NC 1957, p. 89.
9
RIC IV.3, p. xvi.
10
See below p. 128.

Marks of Officinae under Nero

In the gold and silver issues of Rome dated TRP II to TRP X Nero's head was always shown bare to right and there was only one form of obverse legend throughout: NERO CAESAR AVG IMP. In the undated series after a.d. 64 the laureate head alone was employed and it always faced right; although there were three distinct forms of obverse legend each had a definite chronological significance and marked a distinct issue. 11 It would thus have been quite impossible to distinguish the gold and silver coins of different officinae by any obverse detail. The number of reverse types, however, in each issue of aurei and denarii varied with the fluctuations in the volume of coinage issued. There was invariably an increase in the number of reverse types when the volume of coinage became larger and one might reasonably suppose that there was an increase in the number of officinae responsible for it. Conversely fewer reverse types were employed when the volume of coinage in an issue was reduced. This is the clearest possible indication that the coins of different officinae were marked by the use of a distinctive reverse type, and that when an additional officina was brought into use an additional reverse type was introduced.

Throughout the dated series the volume of each year's issue was fairly constant, except that the issue dated TRP VII—at the height of the war in the east—was about three times as large as that of any of the preceding years. 12 After the three reverse types of the

accession year the aurei and denarii used a single reverse type from TRP II to TRP VI, but in TRP VII, the year when output was considerably increased, two additional reverse types were employed. In TRP VIII, VIIII and X the volume of aurei and denarii seems to have dropped back to its original level, and one of the three types for aurei and denarii was dropped during the course of TRP VIIII. In a.d. 65–66, immediately after the reform, there was an exceptionally large output of gold to replace the earlier aurei of the heavy prereform standard, 13 and during this period the aurei were struck in eight reverse types. Subsequently, however, the output of gold was considerably reduced and in Issues 2 and 3 two reverse types alone were employed. The undated denarii broadly followed the same pattern. In the undated denarius Issue 1 there were six substantive reverse types; but in Issues 2, 3a and 3b there were only two substantive reverse types at a time.

The aes coinage was confined to the later years of Nero's principate. It never displayed the wide fluctuations in volume that the gold and silver coinage did; but it shows equally clearly, for quite different reasons, that production at the mint was organized on the basis of its reverse dies, and that its reverse types can thus be regarded as the marks of distinct officinae. There is no obverse detail in any denominations which can satisfactorily be regarded as an officina mark. The two main groups with and without the globe are, as has been demonstrated, the issues of Lugdunum and Rome. The different representations of Nero's head as radiate, laureate or bare do not provide the basis for an officina distinction either. On dupondii Nero's head is sometimes laureate and sometimes radiate, but, except for the rare initial issues at both mints, Rome invariably used the radiate and Lugdunum the laureate head. On copper asses with SC Rome always used the laureate and Lugdunum the bare head. At Rome the bare head alone was used on the copper asses without SC and the radiate head was employed on some orichalcum asses, but each of these groups constituted a distinct issue at a separate date. At both Rome and Lugdunum, in fact, there was one representation, and one only, of Nero's head at any one time on each denomination in each substantive issue. The principal differences in obverse legends at both Rome and Lugdunum marked distinct chronological stages in the production of the coinage, as has been demonstrated above on independent grounds. Minor differences of obverse legend certainly existed in most issues, but in practically every case there is a single predominant form of obverse legend in any one issue and the other forms are comparatively rare variants. The extent to which these principal forms predominate is clearly shown by the evidence of site finds. 14 The rare variants of obverse legend certainly cannot have marked the operation of different officinae, for in that case the output of different officinae would have been badly disproportionate, whereas the whole object of an officina scheme must have been to divide the output of the mint into blocks of manageable and, no doubt, generally equal proportions. 15 In most aes issues Nero's head sometimes faces right and sometimes left; but this cannot be an officina distinction either, as the right-facing heads considerably outnumber the left-facing ones in any issue and on the gold and silver coinage right-facing heads alone are found.

The mint of Rome shows a recurrent pattern of two basic reverse types for every issue in most denominations, 16 and the statistical evidence of site finds shows that the total production in each issue is generally divided fairly equally between each of the two basic reverse types in each denomination. The asses are by far the most common denomination at Rome. The two basic types persist throughout each issue. Apollo and Genius were used in the issues of copper asses without SC, of orichalcum asses without SC and of orichalcum asses with SC and the mark of value. Victory and Janus temple were the two basic types for Nero's last three issues of copper asses from a.d. 65 to 68. Semisses at Rome were similarly issued in the two reverse types of seated Roma and the gaming table commemorating the Certamen Quinquennale. Although the dupondii had four distinct reverse types in the first three issues and the sestertii had a far wider range, both denominations were confined to the two basic reverse types of Roma and Janus temple in Issues IV, V and VI.

End Notes

11
See Chapter 3.
12
There is clear evidence for this in the relative numbers from the Pudukota hoard (NC 1898, pp. 304–5.):
Accession Types Corona Civica Ceres Virtus Roma Total Percentage of Nero
TRP 15 15 13.0
TRP II 9 9 7.8
TRP III 9 9 7.8
TRP IIII 3 3 2.6
TRP V 8 8 6.9
TRP VI 7 7 6.1
TRP VII 9 13 12 2 35 30.4
TRP VIII 3 3 6 5.2
TRP VIIII 3 3 3 9 7.8
TRP X 6 8 14 12.2
13
See Table 6, p. 141 below.
14
The relative frequency of different Lugdunum varieties can be seen clearly in the finds from Mayenne and Condé-sur Aisne. Bulletin de la Société d' Archeologie, Sciences, Arts et Belles Lettres de la Mayenne, 1865, pp. 9ff. and RN 1968, pp. 76–132.
15
This can certainly be accepted as a general principle in the organization of later officina systems. There is usually a good reason for the exceptional cases where the product of an officina is singularly rare. E.g. Officina Δ at Constantinople is rare for part of the reign of Theodosius I, no doubt because the coinage in the name of Maximus was suppressed.
16
See p. 120.

Officinae at Rome

Once it is recognized that the products of different officinae are distinguished by their reverse types, there is little difficulty in reconstructing the way in which the officinae were employed.

Nero's mint at Rome seems to have operated in a single officina from a.d. 54 to 60, in three officinae from a.d. 60 and in six officinae at the peak period of its production after a.d. 64. Moreover some of the officinae which produced gold and silver seem subsequently to have been used for the production of the aes coinage—an extremely interesting point which underlines the basic unity of the mint and should weigh heavily against the existence of two separate Imperial and Senatorial establishments in this period. 17

Aurei and denarii of the same type were probably produced in the same officina. In most issues, after striking its quota of aurei, each officina apparently struck a parallel denarius issue. I have already pointed out that the gold and silver issues follow each other remarkably closely in the details of their obverse and reverse types and that the minor differences that can be noted are primarily chronological distinctions which suggest that the denarii in each issue were struck immediately after the aurei of similar type. There were three distinct aureus and denarius types in the accession year. From TRP II to TRP VI there was merely one reverse type of the corona civica. We can thus regard the precious-metal coins issued from TRP II down to TRP VI as the products of a single officina. In the course of TRP VII the output of gold (and silver) was greatly increased and the number of officinae was increased to a total of three. The two new types of Virtus and Ceres distinguish the two additional officinae, while the third new reverse type of Roma replaced that of the corona civica toward the end of the year, thus marking the continued operation of the first officina. During TRP VIIII one officina ceased to strike in precious metals. In post-reform Issue 1, the undated gold and silver with IMP as a cognomen, three stages may be distinguished: 1a) with two substantive types in gold; 1b) with six substantive types in gold and silver; 1c) with two substantive types in gold and silver. We have traces first of two officinae as in the dated issue TRP X, then of an expansion to six officinae, and eventually a return to the earlier pattern of two officinae. Subsequent Issues 2, 3 a and 3 b each had two substantive reverse types only, and must have been produced by no more than two officinae.

As noted, the aes coinage at Rome seems to have been produced by officinae differentiated by their use of distinctive reverse types; and at most stages during these issues there were two basic, substantive reverse types in each denomination: sestertii; dupondii; asses and quadrantes. The aes at Rome, however, cannot have been produced in ten distinct officinae, two for each denomination, as the output of such officinae would have been very disproportionate in volume. But output would have been comparatively well balanced if the sestertii and dupondii were produced in two officinae and the asses, semisses and quadrantes in two more. At many points there is a remarkable parallelism between the reverse types of the sestertii and dupondii (as indeed we have already noted between the aurei and denarii) and the principal changes of obverse legend that defined the issues are common to both denominations. The sestertii and dupondii, moreover, were struck in orichalcum throughout, whereas the asses, semisses and quadrantes at Rome were struck first in copper, then in orichalcum, and finally (for the asses and quadrantes alone at Rome) once more in copper. The strongest argument, however, for this officina attribution is that it is the only logical division which gives each officina a reasonable share of work throughout the period of the issues. The copper asses with SC are by far the most common coins at the mint of Rome. While they were being struck in Issues IV, V and VI there was no issue of semisses or quadrantes at Rome, and the two officinae in question would have been able to devote their resources entirely to the production of these asses. Proportionately to the duration of the issue, orichalcum asses are fax less common than the copper ones and it was during Issue III, in which most of the orichalcum asses were struck, that the same two officinae would have also had to strike orichalcum semisses and quadrantes. In each issue the sestertii and dupondii appear to be equally common, and in Issues II and III each denomination is about as common as the orichalcum asses of the same issues.

An alternative possibility that must be considered is that in the sestertius and dupondius issues alternative forms of the principal reverse type (such as Roma with victory and spear in lieu of Roma with victory and parazonium in Issues IV and V) and subsidiary reverse types (such as Macellum in Issues II and III of the dupondii) marked the production of those denominations in that particular issue by additional officinae, which may have contributed a token quantity only and which were principally occupied with the issue of other denominations. Analysis of the sestertius types, however 18 reveals surprising variations in the total number of reverse types used in successive stages of each issue. It is most unlikely that these sharp changes can have reflected equally abrupt changes in the number of officinae at work in the mint, when there is a perfectly reasonable and sensible alternative explanation—that each officina used more than one reverse type. It is of course still possible to argue that sestertii (and dupondii) were struck by four not two officinae; but the relative volume of Nero's coinage in different aes denominations does not provide the positive support that one would expect on this hypothesis, and the present balance of evidence certainly seems to favor the alternative view—that subsidiary reverse types and alternative forms were used additionally by the two basic officinae responsible for issuing the denomination.

The various changes in the number of officinae responsible for the production of Nero's gold and silver are rather puzzling until it is realized that the mint must have switched its production capacity from gold and silver to aes and vice versa. Aes Issue I, consisting of the copper asses and semisses without SC, can be dated on independent grounds to the latter part of a.d. 62, which is just the point at which the output of officina 3 (striking the Ceres gold type) seems to have been cut back sharply. Aes Issue II, the remainder of the aes without SC, has been attributed to a.d. 63 in the course of which officina 3 ceased striking in the precious metals. 19 Aes Issue III, the general orichalcum coinage which is the product of four officinae and marks a major expansion in mint capacity, belongs to a.d. 64 when the output of gold and silver was limited to two officinae. Early in a.d. 65 in undated Issue 1b, when there were six officinae striking gold, we have the two original gold and silver officinae of Issue TRP X that had continued in undated Issue 1a, supplemented by the four officinae that had coped with the general orichalcum coinage. At later stages of the aes, these four seem to revert once more to the production of aes.

Although the general principles and outline of this officina system is reasonably clear—that the coins from different officinae were distinguished by the use of distinctive reverse types—the detailed attribution of reverse types to their respective officinae is sometimes extremely difficult and, on our present knowledge, much of it must remain purely tentative. The mint must no doubt have kept a register in which it would record the reverse types allocated to different officinae, but it probably did not matter very much which types were attributed to an officina, so long as a note was kept in the central records. It is for example, reasonably clear that the asses were produced in two officinae at Rome, that the Apollo and Genius types differentiated the two officinae in Issues I, II and III, and the Victory and Janus temple types marked the officinae in Issues IV, V and VI; but there is apparently no means of determining whether the officina which originally struck the Apollo asses subsequently struck the Victory or the Janus temple type. It is especially difficult to attribute the wide range of sestertius types in Issues II and III to the two officinae in which they seem to have been struck. The more common types can be attributed to one officina or the other by the necessity of balancing output between parallel officinae at successive stages in the issues, and we can reasonably assume that once a reverse type was allocated to an officina that type and its subsequent modifications probably remained the distinctive mark of that officina; but there is nothing to indicate the officinae in which the reverse types were struck. In two cases, however, minor details of type and of type development may give some indication of the way in which reverse types were probably associated with officinae. The Roma types of the later sestertii and dupondii sometimes carried a victory and the Roma types in both denominations may perhaps be regarded as the successors of the Victoria type on the earlier dupondii. The Apollo asses and Roma semisses were probably struck in the same officina as both types began with an anepigraphic form whereas the second As type of Genius and the second semis type of the Certamen Quinquennale both began with a full reverse legend. The detailed attribution of reverse types to their officinae can be expressed most clearly in tabular form. 20

Table 4. Officina Types of the Rome Mint Gold and Silver Reverse Types
Issue Officinae
1 2 3 4 5 6
Pre Reform
TRP Agrippina
TRP II Wreath
TRP III Wreath
TRP IIII Wreath
TRP V Wreath
TRP VI Wreath
TRP VII Wreath Virtus Ceres
Roma
TRP VIII Roma Virtus Ceres
Aes I Aes I
TRP VIIII Roma Virtus Ceres
Aes II Aes II Aes II Aes II
TRP X Roma Virtus Aes III Aes III Aes III Aes III
Post Reform
1a Concordia Janus Aes III Aes III Aes III Aes III
1b Salus Jup. Custos Vesta Roma Aug. Augusta Aug. Germanicus
1C Salus Jup. Custos Aes IV Aes IV Aes IV Aes IV
2 Salus Jup. Custos Aes V Aes V Aes V Aes V
3a Salus Jup. Custos Aes VI Aes VI Aes VI Aes VI
3b Salus Standards
Aes Reverse Types
Issue Denomination Officinae
3 4 5 6
I. Copper denominations Without SC Cu. As Apollo Genius
Cu. Sem Roma Table
Cu. Q Column
II. General orichalcum coinage Without SC Or. Sest Annona Decursio
Or. Dup Victoria l. Macellum Securitas
Or. As Apollo Genius
Or. Q Column
III. General orichalcum coinage Or. Sest Annona Decursio
Ostia Arch
SC and marks of value Congiarium
Or. Dup Victoria 1. Macellum
Victoria r. Securitas
Or. As Apollo Genius
Or. Sem Roma Table
Or. Q Column Owl
IV. Traditional denominations IMP as cognomen Or. Sest Roma Janus
Or. Dup Roma Janus
Cu. As Victory Janus
Cu. Q Column Owl
V. IMP as praenomen Or. Sest Roma Janus
Or. Dup Roma Janus
Cu. As Victory Janus
VI. IMP as praenomen TRP XIII and parallel asses Or. Sest Roma Janus
Or. Dup Roma Janus
Cu. As Victory Janus

End Notes

17
This reinforces the arguments in Chapter 4 against a dyarchic view of the coinage. Cf. K. Kraft, J NG 1962, pp. 7–49.
18
See Cat. 70–174.
19
See Chapter 4.
20
In the table of officina types, I have excluded rare reverse types which were not struck in any number (those that do not constitute substantive varieties); and I have classified the minor varieties of a reverse type together under a general heading e.g. the various representations of Roma with different attributes have been classified together as "Roma."

Officinae at Lugdunum

The mint at Lugdunum seems to have been divided into four officinae on much the same basis as the mint of Rome, with two officinae sharing responsibility for the orichalcum denominations of sestertii and dupondii and two others sharing responsibility for the copper denominations of As and semis. There is a recurrent basic pattern of two principal reverse types in each issue of the dupondii and semisses, and the sestertius and As reverse types readily fall into the officina pattern suggested by the other two denominations. Throughout the issue of copper semisses there were only the two types of Roma and the Certamen Quinquennale and both types seem to have been struck in approximately equal numbers. In Issues L-IVB, L-V and L-VI there was a clear recurrent pattern of the two dupondius types of Victoria and Securitas; in Issues L-III and L-IVA there was a third dupondius type of the Macellum, but the Macellum and Securitas types together are no more numerous in those issues than the Victoria type alone, and the same officina was probably responsible both for the Macellum and Securitas types. Lugdunum continued to strike the Genius type concurrent with the new Victory and Janus temple types and added the peculiarly Lugdunum type of Ara Pacis. In the later issues the Victory type heavily outnumbers all the others, but in issues L-IVB and L-V the output of asses can be divided into two balanced groups by setting all the other types in one group and the Victory asses into the other. On the other hand the comparatively rare Janus temple asses at Lugdunum could be associated with the Victory group without greatly upsetting the balance. The sestertii at Lugdunum have almost as wide a range of reverse types as at Rome. They have been attributed here to two officinae on the same principles as the sestertii at Rome and with the same reservations. There was no abrupt or complete change in reverse type at Lugdunum as there was at the beginning of Issue IV at Rome, but there is the same uncertainty about the dupondius and sestertius types to be associated in the same officina, and about the As and semis types which should be associated.

Table 5. Officina Types of Aes at the Lugdunum Mint
Issue Denomination Officinae
L-III. 1 2 3 4
General orichalcum coinage Or. Sest Adlocutio Annona
Or. Dup Victoria Securitas
Macellum
SC and marks of value Or. As Apollo Genius
Or. Sem Table
L-IVA Traditional denominations IMP as cognomen Early forms Or. Sest Adlocutio Annona
Decursio Roma
IMP as cognomen Arch
Earlly forms Or. Dup Victoria Securitas
Macellum
Cu. As Apollo
Cu. Sem Table Roma
L-IVB. Traditional denominations IMP as cognomen Later forms Or. Sest Adlocutio Annona
Decursio Roma
Arch Congiarium
Janus Ostia
Or. Dup Victoria Securitas
Cu. As Victory Ara
Janus Genius
Cu. Sem Table Roma
L-V. IMP as praenomen Early forms Or. Sest Adlocutio Annona
Docursio Roma
Or. Dup Arch Congiarium
Cu. As Victory Ara Victoria Securitas
Janus Genius
Cu. Sem Table Roma
L-VI. IMP as praenomen Later forms Or. Sest Decursio Annona
Arch Roma
Janus Ostia
Or. Dup Victoria Securitas
Cu. As Victory
Cu. Sem

Control of Officinae

The product of each officina at Nero's mints never constituted a distinct and compact die-linked group. In many issues all the reverse types of a denomination, including those which certainly marked the working of different officinae, are die-linked. The die links in Issues I and II at Rome have been noted in Chapter 4; 21 those in Issue L-III at Lugdunum have been noted in Chapter 6; 22 and examples of the sort of die linking that occurs among the sestertii in Issue III at Rome are in Appendix III. 23 The general pattern is very similar to the linking that Kraay has noted among the sestertii of Galba. 24 In most cases where dies are shared at the mint of Rome, there is no obvious trace of deterioration in the observe dies. But at Lugdunum in Issue L-VI, where we can see the progress of a flaw in one obverse die, it is used with the two reverse types of the issue both before and after the flaw develops. 25 There are moreover similar links between the different reverse types of the gold and silver. In Issue 1 of the post-reform aurei, BM 52 with the AugustusAugusta type is struck from the same obverse die as BM 103 with the Vesta type. In Issue 1 of the post-reform denarii, BM 74 and 76 with the Jupitor Custos type are struck from the same obverse die as BM 83 with the Roma type. 26 But in other issues, such as the copper asses without SC of Issue I at Rome, 27 and the sestertii and dupondii dated TRP XIII of Issue VI at Rome, 28 die linkage is very limited; it is rare to find an obverse die used with more than one reverse die, and quite exceptional to find examples of obverse die linkage between the two parallel reverse types.

The pattern of complicated die linkage in some issues, between the reverse types that seem to mark different officinae, and the minimal die linkage in other issues, provides important evidence for the way in which minting operations were controlled. It seems legitimate to conceive that the obverse dies were returned at the end of each day's work to the safe custody of a central mint depository, while the reverse dies were kept in the narrower departmental custody of individual officinae. The following morning an official from each officina would draw obverse dies afresh from the central store and an officina might thus frequently strike with obverse dies which had previously been used in other officinae. But at some periods, when the obverse dies that had been returned were kept separately for each officina within the central depository, or were given a distinctive and recognizable marking, the particular obverse die might be issued repeatedly to the same officina and repeatedly employed on successive occasions with the same reverse die.

To explain die linkage between the marked officinae of the later Roman coinage Bastien 29 originally suggested that obverse dies developing a flaw had been returned to the central mint workshop, repaired and subsequently issued to another officina. Grierson 30 pointed out that in the 5th century obverse dies were still shared between different officinae in cases where they had become damaged, but had not been repaired. This led Sutherland to suggest an alternative hypothesis of the daily return of obverse dies to the central depository very similar to one that I had independently postulated to explain the pattern of die linkage under Nero. We thus seem to have a common pattern, reflecting the same basic mint practice that persisted through at least five centuries of operations at Roman mints.

Sutherland's explanation of the reasons for this procedure is that obverse dies were difficult to prepare and because they gave the coin its imperial authority they were particularly sacrosanct and must not be allowed to fall into the hands of unauthorized persons. But there is no positive evidence that security was any less vigorous for reverse than for obverse dies, and in the coinages of Nero the reverse dies are no less elaborate or difficult to engrave than the obverse ones. For the Julio-Claudian period at least, I would therefore prefer to explain the return of obverse dies after each day's work to the central depository as a clever administrative device to protect both the central mint administration and the departmental officinae masters. The central custody of the obverse dies, which normally have the emperor's titulature or portrait, would protect the government against any unauthorized coining in the emperor's name, and custody within each officina of its own reverse dies, which distinguished its product, would equally protect the officina master against any unauthorized coinage in their name. The purpose of the arrangement would in essence be similar to that of the locks on a mediaeval chest. Each of the two or three locks had a separate key. No single keyholder could open the chest, and business could only be conducted after each keyholder had opened his lock.

This method of controlling the work of officinae was not introduced by Nero, and it seems to have had its origin in the practice of the Republican period. Buttrey has shown that the striking of the Triumviral portrait gold of 42 b.c. was organized not by the obverse portraits of the Triumviri but by the reverse dies on which the moneyer's signature was placed; 31 and I have suggested that this arrangement had the specific purpose of protecting both mint and moneyers against unauthorized coining. 32 The moneyers of Augustus had of course placed their names on the reverse of the coins they struck, while the imperial titulature and sometimes the emperor's portrait was employed on the obverse. In the officina arrangement of Nero and the recurrent pattern of six officinae which emerges clearly at a later stage in the second and third centuries, 33 I would therefore see residual traces of the nominal spheres of responsibility exercised by the Tresviri Monetales; 34 and the fact that there were three magistrates may well explain why Nero's mint was expanded first into three and then into six officinae.

End Notes

21
See pp. 53, 62.
22
See pp. 94, 98.
23
See pp. 255–56.
24
C. M. Kraay, ANSNNM 133, pp. 16ff.
25
See Chapter 7, p. 105.
26
BMCRE I, p. 208.
27
See Chapter 4. pp. 37–43.
28
I plan to publish a die study of this issue in my forthcoming paper on "The Aes of Nero with Tribunician Dates."
29
SM Nov. 1960, pp. 75–77.
30
SM July 1961, pp. 1–8.
31
T. V. Buttrey, Jr., The Triumviral Portrait Gold of the Quattuorviri Monetales of 42 B.C., ANSNNM 137 (New York, 1956), pp. 14ff.
32
See my review of Buttrey, ANSNNM 137 in NCirc 1957, pp. 541–2.
33
Cf. Carson, EssaysMattingly, p. 239.
34
Although the names of tresviri do not appear on the coinage after 4 b.c. the office attested by inscriptions into the third century. Cf. Lenormant, La monnaie, pp. iii, 185ff.

Die Engraving

From this system of controlling the output of the officinae, it follows that there must have been one common die engraving establishment for the production of obverse dies in each mint. For the reverse dies the evidence is less clear, but administrative convenience suggests that they too would probably be produced centrally at each mint and not under separate arrangements within each officina.

The coinage itself throws a most interesting light on the imagines or models used by the die engravers. The imperial portraits used as exemplars for the obverse dies must have been three dimensional representations. Right facing portraits on the undated gold and silver (e.g., Plate I, 22ff.) and on the aes (e.g., Plate II, 71f.) show Nero's hair in the style described by Suetonius "in gradus formata." 35 But left facing portraits (e.g., Plate II, 76) invariably show Nero's hair with downward curls in a fringe over his forehead. These two distinct forms are used concurrently at all stages of the aes issues and at both Rome and Lugdunum. Puzzled by the demonstrably contemporary use, Gabrici argued that one representation must be false and inaccurate and that there must have been two schools of artists at the mint, each following its own type of Nero. 36 But the extant sculpture heads of Nero suggest a simpler explanation. 37 Viewed from the front Nero's hair is shown combed over a frame with each curl curving to the left, and slightly covering the first part of the next curl to the left. In right profile, this arrangement of the curls gives an effect of the hair being arched up from the forehead— the "in gradus" effect of the right facing coin portraits. In left profile one merely sees the downward inclination of each curl, as on the left facing coin portraits. This is the clearest possible indication that the die engravers used three dimensional imagines as their models for the emperor's head.

Three dimensional models must also have been used for some of the reverse types. The two representations of Victoria walking left (Plate VII, 205) and walking right (Plate VII, 200) on the dupondii at Rome are merely two views of the same figure from different angles. The three dimensional interest of the engravers is even betrayed in their treatment of architectural reverse types. The two representations of the Temple of Janus ''with closed door left" (Plate V, 171) and "with closed door right" (Plate V, 165) are in fact two views of the same building. It is not easy to determine whether an architectural model was used or sets of drawings were made specially from the objects represented, but it is clear that considerable trouble was taken by the die engravers to reflect the character of the building.

End Notes

35
Suetonius, Nero 51. For the style cf. Ovid A A 1.507.3, 343 and Quintilian Institutiones Oratoriae 12.10.47.
36
RIN 1897, pp. 285 ff.
37
See Plates XXIV and XXV.

Alignment of Dies

From the die positions noted on Nero's regular aes coinages it is clear that fixed dies were used at both mints; but as there is evidence of heavy die linking among many groups of the coinage, the dies must have been slotted and not hinged. Otherwise dies could not have been used so freely in such combinations. Die positions do not vary greatly.↓ ↑ ↙↑, ↘ ↑ is the normal range. Minor differences in alignment between different pairs of dies are probably due to lack of care in determining the axis of the design. It is, for example, quite easy to give Nero an upward or downward gaze, and reverse types of this period do not usually have a distinct ground line. But it is highly significant that coins struck from the same pair of dies invariably have identical die positions, and brockage pieces have a correspondingly inverted one.

Mint Instructions

At the Roman imperial mints, as at all state mints, there must have been different levels of responsibility within the machinery of government; and at each level the administration must have enjoyed freedom of action within circumscribed limits. For the western mints of Nero we can now suggest with some confidence the scope of the authority and discretion allowed to various levels of the administration. We have distinguished the coinages of the two great western mints, the successive issues at each mint, and the features that distinguish the product of the constituent officinae. We are therefore able to see which variations in the detail of the coinage are permitted in contemporary issues.

Decisions made centrally by the government and applied uniformly in contemporary issues at both mints cover the use of important elements of imperial titulature—of IMP as cognomen and after mid-66 the later change to IMP as a praenomen. In this, as in the tribunician dating, the mints must have followed general government instructions. These must also have covered the denominations to be struck, the employment of orichalcum for all aes denominations in a.d. 64/65, the addition of the mark of value to the dupondius and lower denominations, and the reversion to the earlier pattern of coinage in orichalcum for sestertii and dupondii with copper for the asses and semisses.

In some matters each mint is uniform in its own issues, but differs from the practice at the other mint. In these cases, decisions must have been made by each mint master for his own establishment. At each mint there is a characteristic form of obverse bust truncation, but whereas Lugdunum regularly has a characteristic truncation with a globe, Rome regularly has its own quite distinct form. Some aes denominations are differentiated by different types of imperial portrait, but the two mints do not follow the same practice. For dupondii the regular form is a radiate head at Rome, but a laureate head at Lugdunum; for asses it is a laureate head at Rome but a bare head at Lugdunum; and for semisses it is a laureate head at Rome but a bare head at Lugdunum. There is a similar difference between the mints in the use of reverse types. Although several of the Lugdunum forms are ultimately derived from a prototype at Rome, some such as the Ara Pacis are peculiar to Lugdunum, and others such as the Roma and Janus temple of the dupondii are peculiar to Rome. Even when the same reverse types are common to both mints, they are not used in the same way in contemporary issues at each mint. It is rather certain that some central government permission must have been sought for the use of particular types, but the permissions and instructions must often have been phrased in quite general terms which left considerable scope for mint masters to interpret them in different ways.

Within the general pattern of the coinage at each mint some further variations of detail seem to have a close chronological significance, like the use of the elongated bust truncation in Issues L-III and L-IV A, and the removal of SC to the exergue on Securitas dupondii for Issue L-VI. Both these forms are applied uniformly at the time and must have been the subject of directives from the mint master. But the great majority of minor variations seem to occur contemporaneously in the same issues, and the variant forms often continue in use side by side in several successive issues. Minor variants of obverse legend shortening

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP into

NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP P and

lengthening

IMP NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP and

IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TRP PP into

IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TR POT PP

were certainly due to individual die engravers. Other variants again must have been merely slips or mistakes that passed unchecked, e.g., RMA for ROM on an orichalcum semis, 38 and IT as the mark of value on an orichalcum As. 39 Individual engravers equally seem to have been responsible for the variant of right and left facing portraits which are found concurrently in all the aes issues. The direction of the head certainly has no chronological significance, and is unconnected with the officina organization, but the use of both right and left facing heads will have facilitated the work of a number of die engravers working from a limited number of sculptural imagines.

Altogether, from the multiplicity of these variants, we can piece together something of the practical working of the Roman imperial mint machinery, and distinguish not only the different types of instruction given, but also the scope for discretion allowed to the various officials charged with implementing them.

End Notes

38
BMCRE I, p. 252, 268.
39
Ex Nummis Historia II, 542. There are other examples from the same reverse die in Copenhagen and the Hague.

9. CONTEXT OF THE CURRENCY CHANGES

Chronology of the Innovations

Most of the innovations introduced by Nero into the western coinage are well known. He reduced the gold and silver standard by reducing the weight of the aureus and by debasing the silver while reducing the weight of the denarius. He opened or reopened a branch of the western mint at Lugdunum. He omitted SC from a significant group of the aes coinage. And he introduced a general orichalcum coinage for all the aes denominations, at first without SC, but later with SC and distinguishing marks of value. Many numismatists have suspected that some of these measures were related, but the precise connection between them has hitherto remained obscure and the subject of conjecture. An equally important measure which has not hitherto been fully recognized was the reduction of the al marco standard of the aes denominations, by much the same extent as the reduction of the gold and silver standard.

The detailed analysis of Nero's gold and silver and aes coinages into their successive issues throws considerable light on the scope, context and duration of these measures. The reduction of the gold and silver standard had a lasting effect on the imperial coinage. All the subsequent gold and silver issues of Nero followed the reduced standard of the first undated issue; and the year of the reform eventually became a critical one in the circulation of gold and silver. The reduction in the al marco standard of the aes coinages, was never subsequently restored. All the later aes issues of Nero and subsequent emperors were struck to the reduced weight range. But as the aes was a token coinage and the new standard covered a range of weights which overlapped much of the weight range of the preceding standard, the measure did not materially affect the continued circulation of the earlier aes issues. The opening of the branch mint at Lugdunum was more ephemeral, but the issues continued throughout the later years of Nero, during the civil war and into the Flavian period. Previously the omission of SC has not been closely defined, but we now know that the innovation was confined to Issues I and II of the aes at Rome. Moreover whereas Sydenham 1 thought that the general orichalcum coinage continued at Rome and was abandoned on the death of Nero, we now know that it was confined to Issues II and III of the aes at Rome. This in turn explains why there was no aes without SC at Lugdunum, and why there are so few orichalcum asses and semisses struck at Lugdunum. Production at Lugdunum only commenced right at the end of Issue III at Rome, some time after SC had been restored to the aes at Rome, and only just before the general orichalcum coinage was abandoned in favor of the earlier coinage pattern with asses and semisses in copper. From the interrelationships of these issues of gold, silver and aes, we can trace the relative chronology of Nero's currency innovations.

a.d. 62 — Copper asses and semisses without SC

Rome aes Issue I introduced during gold and silver issue TRP VIII

63 — General orichalcum coinage without SC

Rome aes Issue II introduced during gold and silver issue TRP VIIII

64 — General orichalcum coinage with SC and marks of value

Rome aes Issue III introduced during the gold and silver issue of TRP X

Late 64 — Reduction of the gold and silver standard

Rome gold Issue 1a some time after gold and silver issue TRP X

Reduction of the al marco aes standard introduced during Rome orichalcum As Issue III

Branch mint opened at Lugdunum

Lugdunum aes Issue L-III, just before the end of Rome orichalcum As Issue III

Early 65 — Extensive recoinage of aurei on reduced standard

Rome undated Issue 1b introduced in all officinae after general orichalcum coinage abandoned

Late 65 — Restoration of earlier Julio-Claudian aes denominations Rome aes Issue IV

End Notes

1
Sydenham, Nero, pp. 22–23.

Reduction of the Gold and Silver Standard

The general character of Nero's measure has long been recognized. After the gold and silver issue dated TRP X, the weight of the aureus was reduced to 1/45th of a pound of gold 2 and of the denarius to 1/96th of a pound of silver, 3 and the silver content of the denarius was lowered by between 5 and 10%.

There has been considerable dispute about the motive for altering the weight standards. The reform has often been regarded as the device of a financially embarrassed administration when its resources had been depleted by the personal extravagance of the emperor, expensive foreign wars and the disastrous fire at Rome. 4 Soutzo, by contrast, suggested that the reform was an elaborate and ambitious scheme to unify the eastern and western coinages of the Empire. 5 It has also been argued that the reform was an attempt to adjust the coinage to the current market value of gold and silver, and that it was designed to check the export of silver out of the empire and ensure an adequate supply of coinage at home: 6 and West has reminded us that the debasement of the silver may merely have been an attempt to improve the wearing quality of the metal. 7

The reduction of the gold and silver standards must be placed after the issue of aurei and denarii struck on the old standard and dated TRP X (December a.d. 63/64). TRP X was a full issue in Nero's dated series, and its coins are as common as those of any other previous year of the dated coinage. 8 Moreover, between the latest coins struck on the old standard and the earliest undated ones of the reduced standard there is a remarkable break. The portraiture on the new coins (Plate I, 22 ff.) is more developed and realistic, their conception and style are more inspired and vigorous and they have few points in common with the dated coins of the earlier series (Plate I, 13–20).

During the fifty years between a.d. 14 and the year of the reform there had been some slight modification in the weight standards of both the gold and silver at Rome. The standard of the aureus had been reduced by steady but slight and almost imperceptible changes. Pliny's explicit statement, 9 "Postea placuit xxxx signari ex auri libris paulatimque principes inminuere pondus et novisissime Nero ad xxxxv," has been fully confirmed by the weights of surviving specimens. A frequency table of aureus weights (Appendix II, Table 1) shows a point of concentration at 7.8 gm. for Tiberius, 7.7 gm. for Gaius and Claudius, and 7.6 gm. for the pre-reform period of Nero. The total reduction, however, of the aureus weight standard in the fifty years between the accession of Tiberius and the tenth tribunician year of Nero did not amount to more than this slight 0.2 gm. During the same period there had also been some significant alterations in the weight standard of the denarius. Denarii in the British Museum have an average weight of 3.75 gm. under Augustus, dropping to 3.65 gm. under Tiberius but subsequently rising to 3.69 gm. under Gaius and 3.75 gm. under Claudius. Then in the pre-reform period of Nero the average drops back sharply to 3.54 gm. 10 The same trends can be seen in the frequency table of denarius weights. (Appendix II, Table 2).

There is no reason to doubt the established view that these fluctuations in the denarius weight standard reflect an attempt by the mint to adjust the relative weights of the aureus and denarius to the changing relative values of gold and silver on the open market. 11 Prima facie it would seem that the gradual and slight reduction in the aureus weight standard was designed to serve the same purpose; and West has used these data to calculate that the ratio of gold to silver was 1:11.82 under Tiberius, 1:11.94 under Gaius, 1:12.33 under Claudius dropping back to 1:11.66 in the pre-reform period of Nero. 12 It is, however, far from clear why the mint should have found it necessary to reduce the weights of both aureus and denarius merely to keep pace with the changing values of gold and silver as bullion. Even if the mint desired to maintain a perfectly balanced bimetallism, it could easily have countered a drop in the relative value of silver and conversely, when the relative value of silver rose, the easiest course would have been to lower the weight of the denarius—leaving the weight standard of the aureus constant in both cases. If the relative price of silver rose during the early years of Nero and the mint was merely anxious to maintain a closely balanced bimetallism it is very strange that the mint should have continued a policy of gradually reducing the aureus weight, because this would inevitably necessitate an even greater reduction in the denarius weight.

Mommsen's view that the gradual reduction of the aureus weight represented a measure of illegal profit for the mint officials is equally unconvincing. 13 The policy of gradual reduction was in fact a regular and long continued one which was pursued again after the reform of Nero, and it is far more likely that the profit benefited the government. The government can, however, probably be absolved from any fraudulent intent, as its policy seems to have been designed primarily to ensure that the weight of new aurei minted each year was not materially higher than the average weight of the aurei of previous emperors still remaining in circulation. The total reduction in the weight of the aureus between a.d. 14 and 64 did not amount to more than 0.2 gm.—and this is just about the loss in weight due to wear that one might expect after an aureus had circulated for about a half century. For example, Nero's undated aurei both 14 in the 1927 Rome hoard and in the Liberchies hoard 15 seem to have lost about 0.3 gm. in a century of circulation. Their weights show a clear point of concentration at 7.0 gm. whereas the point of concentration for well preserved undated aurei of Nero is 7.3 gm. The same device of gradually reducing the weight standard of the aureus was employed again in the period after the reform. West's frequency tables clearly show that, except for Domitian's unsuccessful attempt to return to the old Julio-Claudian standard, the aureus weight again dropped regularly though almost imperceptibly. 16 The general success of this monetary policy is well demonstrated in the remarkably close range of the weights of aurei of different emperors in hoards that cover a fairly long period.

Nero's alteration in the aureus weight standard was quite different in kind from the gradual reduction that had taken place in the earlier Julio-Claudian period. His undated aurei show a distinct point of concentration at 7.3 gm.–o.3 gm. lower than the point of concentration of the aurei of the immediately preceding issue dated TRP X, and, so far as can be ascertained, 0.3 gm. lower than the average weight of the aurei of Tiberius, Gaius and Claudius that still remained in circulation at the time of the reform. The undated aurei were struck on a fairly close standard. There is certainly no evidence for the secondary point of concentration at 108 grains (7.0 gm.) which West has shown in his frequency table. He has unfortunately included there the weights of a large number of worn aurei from the 1927 Rome hoard, and this distorts the point of concentration. The reform thus meant that the vast majority already in circulation contained about 0.3 gm. more than the new aurei to which they were, apparently, nominally equal in value. The old coins would in fact have contained about 1/25th or 4% more gold than the new aurei of the reformed standard.

The sudden lowering of the weight standard did not immediately drive the earlier and heavier aurei out of circulation. Throughout the Flavian period, they are still to be found in hoards, presumably because their bullion value did not yet exceed their nominal value; 17 but they do seem to occur less commonly in normal circulation. The mint certainly seems to have made a resolute effort to replace as much as it could of the earlier and heavier gold coinage by freshly minted aurei struck on the new and lower standard; and there were very large issues of aurei in the year of the reform. The maximum period for the issue of Nero's undated aurei was less than four years; but almost 90% of them were issued before mid-A.D. 66 when Nero assumed the praenomen imperator, and little more than 10% can be attributed to the last two years of his principate (a.d. 66–68). In the hoards of Flavian and later date there is a remarkably large number of Nero's post-reform aurei compared with the issues of the eleven years of the principates of Vespasian and Titus. In an analysis of Flavian gold hoards 18 I have noted 180 aurei from the eleven years of the principates of Vespasian and Titus compared with 81 undated aurei of Nero; and no less than 70 of Nero's aurei were struck in the year and a half that followed the reform. There is no reason why a hoarder should prefer Nero's post-reform aurei to those of Vespasian and Titus. Both groups were struck in equally fine gold on the same weight standard—the weights of each show a clear point of concentration at 7.3 gm. The inevitable conclusion is that issues of Nero's undated aurei before mid-a.d. 66 were much more extensive than in any comparable period during the principates of Vespasian and Titus. Coins from the 1927 Rome hoard plotted against the years in which they were issued (Table 6) suggest that the output of aurei immediately after the reform must have been about nine times greater than in any other single year during the period (i.e. an annual rate about six times greater).

The reform of the silver took place at the same time as the alteration in the weight standard of the gold and must have been part of the same general measure. Issues of denarii are closely parallel to those of the aurei in both the dated and undated series. The proportional reduction in the bullion value of the denarius was very similar to the contemporary reduction in the real value of the aureus, and ultimately the year of the reform was a critical date in hoards of both aurei and denarii. But, at the time the reform of the silver seems to have been regarded as quite secondary. Mattingly suggested 19 that Nero may have called in the old silver coinage in a.d. 65; but unlike the aurei there is no indication of any replacement of earlier denarii by large issues of fresh coin on the new standard until the middle years of Vespasian. Hoards of post-reform denarii contain comparatively few coins of Nero compared with those of Vespasian and Titus. In the Reka Devnia hoard 20 there are 102 postreform denarii of Nero, an annual average of 25, but 2,174 denarii of Vespasian and Titus, an annual average of about 200. From the Falkirk hoard 21 it is clear that the exceptionally large issue is that of Vespasian in a.d. 75; and this strongly suggests that the heavier denarii of the early empire were replaced not under Nero but under Vespasian. 22

End Notes

2
Pliny, NH 13.3.13.
3
BMC RE I, pp. xliv–xlv.
4
Cf. Grant, Roman Imperial Money, pp. 247–8.
5
M. C. Soutzo, "Étude sur les monnaies impériales romanes II. Le Système monétaire de Néron," RN 1898, pp. 659–66.
6
T. L. Comparette, "Debasement of the Silver Coinage under Nero," AJN 1913, pp. 131–41, and Mattingly Roman Coins, pp. 124–5.
7
L. C. West, Gold and Silver Coin Standards in the Roman Empire, ANSNNM 94 (New York, 1941), pp. 56 f.
8
See the numbers in the Pudukota hoard NC 1898, pp. 304–20.
9
Pliny, NH 13.13.47.
10
BMCRE I, p. lii.
11
West, ANSNNM 94, p. 56.
12
West, ANSNNM 94, p. 8.
13
Theodor Mommsen, Histoire de la monnaie romaine 3 (Paris, 1873), pp. 230.
14
S. L. Cesano, "Ripostiglio di aurei imperiali rinvenuto a Roma," Bulletino della Commissione Archeologia Communale di Roma 1930, pp. 14, 83–5.
15
M. Thirion, Le trésor de Liberchies. Aurei des Ier et IIe siècles (Brussels, 1972).
16
West, ANSNNM 94, pp. 17–19.
16 Cf. the weights of coins throughout the 1927 Rome hoard.
17
As Sture Bolin points out in State and Currency in the Roman Empire (Stockholm, 1958), Chapter 4.
18
In a study of the circulation of gold under the early empire—now in draft.
19
Mattingly, Roman Coins, p. 186.

Relation with Eastern Silver Coinages

One result of the change in the denarius weight standard in a.d. 65 was that the eastern silver coinages enjoyed a more favorable relationship with the Roman denarius. Mattingly has argued against this, on the grounds that the eastern provincial silver suffered a corresponding reduction, but although some adjustments were made to the eastern silver coinages at the end of Nero's principate, they were not so drastic.

After regular yearly issues of tetradrachms at Antioch from a.d. 59/60 there was an abrupt break after the issue dated a.d. 63/64, 23 just at the time of the gold and silver reform at the mint of Rome. This break coincides with the close of the war in the east, and the end of the immediate need for additional currency in Syria to make war payments. When the issue of tetradrachms was resumed in a.d. 68 the denomination was struck to a weight standard that was virtually the same as that used before a.d. 64. The single tetradrachm quoted by Wruck for a.d. 68 has a weight of 14.40 gm.—a mere 1% less than the 14.53 gm. which he gives as the average weight of 66 tetradrachms of Nero's earlier period. 24 It can be seen from Table 3 in Appendix B that the weight range of the tetradrachms of Galba and Vespasian is only 0.2 gm. or 1.3% lower than the earlier Nero tetradrachms, compared with the reduction of about 5.4% in the weight range of the denarius in a.d. 65. Spectrographic analysis, 25 moreover, has shown that the proportion of silver in the Antioch tetradrachms remained unchanged. Coins of Vespasian contain 90% silver as do the early tetradrachms of Nero, whereas the silver content of the Roman denarius was reduced by between 5 and 10%. There is no suggestion in hoards that a.d. 65 was a critical year for the circulation of Antioch tetradrachms, as it proved to be ultimately for the Roman denarius. In the Tyre hoard, 26 buried during the Flavian period, there were 32 early tetradrachms of Nero out of the 38 imperial tetradrachms that it contained; all the imperial denarii in the hoard from Eleutheropolis 27 were postreform coins, but n of the 28 Antioch tetradrachms were issued before a.d. 65; the fifth Dura hoard, 28 which had imperial denarii from the reform to the time of Commodus, had 5 early tetradrachms of Nero; and 3 of the 28 tetradrachms in the Nineveh hoard 29 were struck in a.d. 59/60, 62/63 and 63/64, whereas its Roman denarii rangep from Galba to Geta as Caesar.

Table 6. Post-Reform Aurei in the 1927 Rome Hoard Plotted by Issues

NERO—IMP

image

The weight standard of the drachm at Caesarea in Cappadocia was reduced slightly after a.d. 64 and its silver content also was slightly lowered, but its circulation does not appear to have been affected by these changes. Table 4 in Appendix II shows that the weights of Vespasian's drachms range from 3.3 to 3.6 gm. whereas those of Nero before a.d. 65 range from 3.4 to 3.7 gm. This difference of 0.1 gm. represents a weight reduction of about 3%. Earlier drachms of Nero contain about 67% silver, whereas those of Vespasian contain only 60%. 30 It is interesting to note that there is no indication of any break at a.d. 65 in the only large hoard of first century silver from Cappadocea that has been recorded so far—the hoard found ca. 1906 at Caesarea which contained local silver from Tiberius to Hadrian. 31

The differing extent of these changes in the silver coinages at Rome, Antioch, and Caesarea were: 32

NERO PRE-A.D. 65 POST-A.D. 65 NERO AND VESPASIAN
Weight Standard Silver Per Cent Silver Content Weight Standard Silver Per Cent Silver Content
Denarius, Rome 3.7 gm. 99 3.67 gm. 3.5 gm. 93 3.26 gm.
Drachm, Antioch 33 3.7 gm. 90 3.37 gm. 3.65 gm. 90 3.27 gm.
Drachm, Caesarea 3.7 gm. 67 2.41 gm. 3.6 gm. 60 2.16 gm.

It will be noted that the post-reform silver content of the drachm at Antioch was made virtually the same as that of the denarius at Rome, and this was no doubt a decisive factor in securing the free circulation of the post-reform denarius in the east—a free circulation that can be seen in the finds at Antioch 34 and Dura-Europus 35 and in the hoards from Eleutheropolis and Nineveh. 36 The silver content of the drachm at Caesarea was similarly adjusted at the time of the reform to bring it in line with that of the denarius, but it only amounted to two-thirds of the silver content of the denarius. Unless the Caesarean drachm was overvalued in relation to its bullion content by 50% more again than the Roman denarius—which in itself is most unlikely—we can hardly escape the conclusion that it circulated with the denarius in the relation of 3:2. 37

End Notes

20
N. A. Mouchmov, Le trésor numismatique de Reka-Devnia (Sofia, 1934).
21
NC 1934, PP. 1–30.
22
There is further evidence of such a Flavian review of earlier silver in the rare countermarks image and image on worn Republican denarii in the middle Danubian provinces (cf. M. Bahrfeldt, "Contremarken Vespasians auf Römischen Familiendenaren,'' ZNum 1876, pp. 354–74; ZNum 1887, pp. 67–74). The denarius of Vespasian dated COS V with this countermark in Oxford gives a.d. 74 as the terminus post quem for its application.
23
Wruck, Die syrische Provinzialprägung, p. 182.
24
Wruck, Die syrische Provinzialprägung, p. 87.
25
See the analyses in Appendix A.
26
S. P. Noe, A Bibliography of Greek Coin Hoards, ANSNNM 78 (New York, 1937), 1142. These coins were sold at Sotheby's on March 26, 1888 (Sale Cat., pp. 24–25).
27
J. N. Svoronos, JIAN 1907, pp. 230–52.
28
E. T. Newell, The Fifth Dura Hoard, ANSNNM 58 (New York, 1933).
29
NC 1931, pp. 160–70.
30
See the analyses in Appendix I.
31
Agnes Baldwin, "Un trésor monétaire découvert à Césarée en Cappadoce," Arethuse 1927, pp. 145–72.
32
These figures are based on the analyses in Appendix I.
33
The figures for the theoretical drachm at Antioch are quoted to make comparison easier with the Roman denarius and Caesarean drachm. They are simply the weights, etc., of the tetradrachm divided by four.
34
D. B. Waagé, Antioch-on-the-Orontes IV, Pt. 2 (Princeton, 1952), pp. 93 ff.
35
A. R. Bellinger, Excavations at Dura-Europos VI, The Coins (New Haven, 1949), pp. 30ff.
36
See notes 29 and 31 above.

The General Orichalcum Coinage

Nero's experiment omitting SC from Issues I and II of the aes at Rome has already been discussed. His other significant experiment with the aes was the introduction of the general orichalcum coinage at Rome in Issues II and III. Earlier in the Julio-Claudian period sestertii and dupondii alone had been struck in orichalcum. In these issues however Nero also struck asses, semisses and quadrantes in orichalcum. Orichalcum was regarded as a more valuable alloy than copper, the usual ratio being about 8: 5. 38 This had meant that the copper As under Tiberius had been struck to a standard of about 11 gm., while the orichalcum dupondius, a coin double its value, had been struck to standard of about 14.5 gm. These denominations now struck for the first time in orichalcum by Nero—the asses, semisses and quadrantes—were principally struck at the mint of Rome and mostly circulated in Italy. There is no evidence to support the suggestion that the orichalcum asses, etc. were designed for circulation in the east; 39 and there are no asses or lower denominations in copper that can be attributed to the mint of Rome during the period when these denominations were being struck in orichalcum.

The sestertii and dupondii of the general orichalcum coinage were struck to the weight standard that had been used by Claudius, with the dupondius weight (15–17 gm.) slightly higher than one half that of the sestertius (26–30 gm.). The earliest orichalcum asses (8.5– 9.5 gm.) were similarly slightly heavier than half the weight of the dupondii. But, even so, the orichalcum asses were much lighter than the preceding copper asses (10.5–12.5 gm.). The great advantage to the mint was that for the expenditure of a given quantity of copper it was able to produce far more asses, semisses and quadrantes in orichalcum than if it had struck the same denominations in pure copper.

Soutzo has argued 40 that Nero's orichalcum coinage was part of a general measure to unify the structure of coinage throughout the empire. He believed that the Roman system, previously quite independent, was adapted to that of the Greek coinage, with proportional values that could easily be related. As noted above, this was certainly one of the results of the reduction of the silver standard, even though it was not apparently the primary purpose of the measure. There are, however, serious difficulties in reconciling Nero's new orichalcum coinage at Rome closely with the various aes systems current in the Greek cities of the east; and as Sydenham points out, 41 the elaborate statistics of coin weights tabulated by Soutzo deviate considerably from the actual weights of the coins as we know them. But we now know that the denominations in brass at Corinth during the early Julio-Claudian period were in fact known as As, semis and quadrans, 42 and their weights cover much the same range as the same denominations at Rome in Nero's general orichalcum coinage. The names of the denominations at Antioch have not yet been recovered, but we do know that brass was used for coins of large, medium and small sizes. So that even though a precise correlation between the metrology of all the coinages cannot be successfully claimed, there can be little doubt that the basic idea of providing all the token aes in brass came from the east, and to this extent Soutzo is vindicated, even though the introduction of the general orichalcum coinage can no longer be regarded as the complementary part of the gold and silver reform.

End Notes

37
The normal equation of the drachm of Caesarea and the Roman denarius has been based on Sydenham's interpretation of image and image on some unusual silver coins of Caesarea as 12 and 24 Italian asses in Caesarea in Cappadocia, pp. 4–5, 38–40. Their silver content is, however, approximately equal to a silver quinarius and denarius respectively; and their signs of value can equally well be 12 and 24 assaria (= ½ and 1 denarius).
38
BMCRE Intro., p. xlvii.
39
Sydenham, Nero, p. 16 following in part the idea of Soutzo, RN 1898, PP. 659–66.
40
RN 1898, pp. 659–66.
41
Sydenham, Nero, pp. 19 ff.
42
D. W. MacDowall, NC 1962, pp. 113–23.

Reduction of the al marco Aes Standard

The relative sequence of Nero's measures reinforces this interpretation. The general orichalcum coinage was first introduced in a.d. 64. The reduction in the gold and silver standard did not occur until the end of that year, and was itself paralleled by a comparable reduction in the al marco standard of the aes, during the course of aes Issue III at Rome, toward the end of the general orichalcum coinage.

Whereas the Roman imperial gold and silver was struck al peso, so that changes in the weight standard were immediately noticeable, the aes denominations were struck al marco, and the weights of a denomination in any given issue cover quite a wide range. The spread of weights in fact tends to obscure changes in metrology introduced by the mint; and as the aes was largely a token coinage providing the small change for the gold and silver, these adjustments in weight hardly ever affected the circulation of an aes denomination. But when a sufficiently large number of coin weights are plotted in a frequency table there is no difficulty in determining the normal weight range for an issue, and by plotting the weights of successive issues, we readily see the changes in the al marco standard.

It will be seen from the frequency table of the sestertii and dupondii (Appendix B, Table 5) that the range of weights in Issue II, when Nero introduced the general orichalcum coinage, is much the same as under Claudius; in Issue IV, after Nero abandoned the general orichalcum coinage, the range of weights is appreciably lower; and in Issue III, the general orichalcum coinage with SC, the weights cover both ranges. This clearly suggests that the reduction in weight standard took place in the course of Issue III. The order of the reduction for the dupondius is from ca. 16 gm. to ca. 14 gm.—about 10%. There are comparable changes in metrology during the course of successive issues of the orichalcum asses (Appendix B, Table 7.).

There is also a comparable reduction in the range of weights of the copper asses at Rome, between Issue I (before the general orichalcum coinage was introduced) and Issues IV and V (after the general orichalcum coinage had been abandoned). Issue I ranges from 10.5 to 12.5 gm. whereas Issues IV and V range from 9.5 to 12.0 gm.—a reduction of between 5 and 10%.

Purpose of the Currency Changes

The key to the interpretation of Nero's measures is to be found in the different ways in which the mint dealt with the gold and silver and aes.

The general orichalcum coinage was indeed an imaginative project, suggested by the pattern of imperial coinage in the east. But it was introduced without any alteration to the gold and silver standard, and was not an ancillary part of a gold and silver measure. When the gold and silver standard was subsequently reduced, the al marco standard of the aes was reduced pari passu. The experiment of the general orichalcum coinage was ultimately abandoned when the authorities found it necessary to devote the production of all six officinae at Rome to the recoinage of gold on the reduced standard; and this emergency was the occasion when the branch mint at Lugdunum was reopened.

The parallel reduction of the gold and silver content of the coinage clearly rule out the suggested explanation that the chief purpose of that measure was to adjust the relative gold and silver content of aureus and denarius to the current relative values of the metals on the open market. Had this been the aim, there would have been no need to reduce the precious metal content of both denominations. And although the measure certainly ensured a better relationship between the denarius and the eastern silver, this cannot have been its sole or principal purpose. This aim could have been achieved more easily by improving the quality of silver at Antioch and Caesarea, or by an official exchange rate, measures which would have avoided the awkward necessity of recoining the existing gold in a very short time.

The hurried recoinage of a significant part of the gold currency already in circulation is perhaps the most remarkable feature of Nero's action in a.d. 65. Although the gold and silver standards were reduced at the same time, and the standard of the aes was adjusted to follow them, during the initial year of the changed standards the mint noticeably concentrated its resources on the gold recoinage. It was content to leave the replacement of pre-reform silver until the middle years of Vespasian. The reason for this can only have been the large profit to be made from recoining the gold. From the bullion of every 25 old aurei, the mint could produce 26 new ones, and enjoy a profit of 4 to 5%, i.e. about one denarius for each gold coin processed; and it seems to have been able to recoin a large number of the aurei already in circulation.

But the mint paid a heavy penalty for its hurried recoinage of the gold. It was forced to abandon its apparently successful introduction of a general orichalcum coinage, because the productive capacity of the mint was needed for more urgent work. When the coinage of aes was resumed at Rome, the mint did not return to the general orichalcum coinage, but reverted to the earlier Julio-Claudian pattern with sestertii and dupondii alone in orichalcum, and with the asses, semisses and quadrantes in copper. It is not difficult to suggest why this should have been so. The continuation of the general orichalcum coinage would have involved the recoinage of all the existing copper asses, semisses and quadrantes, and after the changes in the gold and silver denominations, the mint must have been anxious to avoid such an enormous undertaking. The mint had already tackled the replacement of the heavier aurei, and must have been in a good position to make a practical assessment of the problems of recoinage. It still had to face the replacement of the pre-reform silver, a far larger operation than the replacement of the pre-reform gold in view of the larger number of denarii in circulation; and it did not manage to tackle the replacement of the silver resolutely until the middle years of Vespasian. In the later years of Nero there must have been quite a shortage of small change in Gaul, Britain and the Rhineland, where copies of Claudian and earlier aes are commonly found; and the return to the existing pattern of currency would enable the authorities to devote their resources to meeting these needs, without the additional problem of replacing all the existing copper denominations.

The sudden interruption of the carefully laid plans for the general orichalcum coinage suggests a situation of some emergency, and from what we now know of the chronology of Nero's measures, there is no difficulty in identifying what the emergency must have been. The profit from the gold recoinage was reaped at the end of a.d. 64 and during a.d. 65, the period that followed the Great Fire at Rome of July 64. 43 This disaster had added another unexpected burden on the finances of the empire, at a time when resources must have already been depleted by the ambitious projects of Nero and by prolonged warfare in Britain and Armenia. Of the fourteen districts of the city, three had been leveled to the ground, and in seven others only shattered half-burnt relics of houses remained. Nero raised temporary buildings to house the homeless, brought supplies of food from neighboring towns, and reduced the price of corn. In his rebuilding plans, no expense was spared. He built himself a magnificent palace out of the ruins. He promised to erect colonades at his own expense in front of the blocks of tenements; and he offered rewards proportionate to each person's position and property which they were to obtain on the completion of so many houses or blocks of buildings. Tacitus describes how Italy was thoroughly exhausted by contributions of money, and the provinces were ruined. Even the gods fell victims to plunder, for the temples in Rome were despoiled and images of deities were seized in Asia and Achaea. 44

The interval between the Great Fire in July 64, and the reduction of the gold and silver standard with its profitable recoinage of the gold is indeed just the interval that one would expect before the administration could assess the full extent of the increased financial burden it would have to face and could devise and implement measures to meet it. It therefore seems impossible to avoid the conclusion that the reduction of the gold and silver standard under Nero was a direct consequence of the Great Fire at Rome in a.d. 64; and that a calculated devaluation of the real worth of the coin denominations then in circulation was one of a variety of measures to raise funds for Nero's depleted treasury. To this extent, the analysis and arrangement of the coinage into its successive issues can throw light on the disputed motives of a complicated set of monetary measures.

End Notes

43
Tacitus, Annals 15.38. ff
44
Tacitus, Annals 15.45.

10. IN CONCLUSION

Perhaps the most interesting and significant conclusion to be drawn from this analysis is the orderly and essentially simple administrative framework responsible for producing the coinage. The western coinages of Nero are extremely rich and varied; but from the multiplicity of types and varieties we can now trace with reasonable confidence the significance of the major component elements.

The product of the branch mint at Lugdunum is clearly distinguished by a deliberate and characteristic form of bust truncation and the unmistakable Lugdunum globe. The products of each of the officinae, the administrative sub-divisions of both the mint of Rome and the mint of Lugdunum, were distinguished by the orderly use of characteristic reverse types, which were regularly and systematically changed. But perhaps the most impressive feature of the whole coinage in the extremely orderly way in which it can be classified into distinct issues. In this study the various issues of gold, silver and aes have been distinguished by objective criteria, set in their relative sequence on the evidence of internal and progressive development, and related to those of the issues that have a tribunician date.

It should not pass unnoticed that this independent arrangement falls naturally into a clear pattern of one major aes issue for each year from a.d. 62 to the end of Nero's principate. The issues of gold and silver also fall naturally into one major issue for each year, except for the period between a.d. 64 and 66; and even in this highly exceptional period there remain traces of the same regular and recurrent pattern of issues—with a distinguishable stage for each year. Throughout the whole coinage we can see links between related denominations, at least between aurei and denarii, between sestertii and dupondii and between asses, semisses and quadrantes. As a result we can be reasonably precise about the dating of issues even when they are actually undated. Technically the tribunician dates of Nero run from 10th December in each year; but his coin issues seem to be related to the annual tenure of office by the responsible magistrates—the tresviri monetales rather than to the renewal of the emperor's tribunicia potestas. They are therefore dated by the calendar years with which the tribunician datings largely coincided.

Gold and Silver Aes
a.d. Dated Issues Undated Issues Dated Issues Undated Issues
54 Accession
55 TRP
56 TRP II
57 TRP III
58 TRP IIII
59 TRP V
60 TRP VI
61 TRP VII
62 TRP VIII I
63 TRP VIIII II
64 TRP X 1a III L-III
65 1b IV IV L-IV
66 1c V L-V
67 2 VI VI L-VI
68 3 last issue

Moreover this sort of juxtaposition of issues suggests that there may at times have been a systematic cyclical pattern of production at the mint of Rome, in which officinae produced first aurei, then denarii and finally sestertii and/or other aes denominations in say a.d. 62, 63, 67 and 68. In fact, this may well reflect normal Julio- Claudian mint practice more accurately than the exceptional arrangements evolved for a.d. 64 to 66, to meet the exceptional circumstances of those years.


THE CATALOGUE

General Notes

* An asterisk in front of a catalogue number indicates that the variety is illustrated in the accompanying plates. In each case, it is the example quoted first in the catalogue that is illustrated.

Where more than one example of a variety is illustrated, the coins in the plate for that catalogue number are shown in the order in which they are cited in the catalog entry and text discussion.

+ A frequency mark (+) after an entry for an aureus or denarius indicates that the variety is regularly represented in hoards. A frequency mark (+) after an entry for a sestertius, dupondius, As semis or quadrans indicates that the variety has been noted from three distinct obverse and reverse dies.

Die links between examples of aes denominations cited in the catalogue are shown in the following way:

BM (P) The second example, P, is struck from the same obverse die as the preceding coin—BM.
BM P The second example, P, is struck from the same reverse die as the preceding coin—BM.
BM (P) The second example, P, is struck from the same obverse and reverse dies as the preceding coin—BM.
BM P The second example, P, is struck from different obverse and reverse dies.

The catalogue is intended to be a catalogue of types and varieties, and not a catalogue of dies. While examples are quoted wherever possible from three distinct obverse and reverse dies, this is merely to establish the substantive varieties in each issue. Minor die varieties are therefore grouped together as a single entry in the catalogue, which does not, for example, distinguish the different number of ships on different Ostia reverse dies, or the different composition of the pile of arms on the Roma reverse dies.

The dates given in the catalogue to successive issues are those suggested in Chapters 9 and 10.

(1) Quadriga

EX SC in exergue. Quadriga drawn r. by four horses.

(2) Wreath

EX SC within oak wreath. Legends:

NERONI CLAVD DIVI F CAES AVG GERM IMP TRP

PONTIF MAX TRP II PP (Plate I, 4)

PONTIF MAX TRP III PP

PONTIF MAX TRP IIII PP

PONTIF MAX TRP V PP

PONTIF MAX TRP VI COS IIII PP

PONTIF MAX TRP VII COS IIII PP

(3) Chariot

AGRIPP AVG DIVI CLAVD NERONIS CAES MATER

In field, EX SC Divus Augustus and Divus Claudius seated l. on chariot drawn l. by four elephants

(Plate I, 3)

(4) Ceres

EX SC in field. Ceres veiled standing l., r. holding two corn ears and poppy, l. a long torch. Legends:

PONTIF MAX TRP VII COS IIII PP (Plate I, 11)

PONTIF MAX TRP VIII COS IIII PP

PONTIF MAX TRP VIIII COS IIII PP

(5) Virtus

EX SC in field. Virtus, helmeted, standing l. with r. foot on helmet, r. holding parazonium, l. a long spear. Legends:

PONTIF MAX TRP VII COS IIII PP

PONTIF MAX TRP VIII COS IIII PP

PONTIF MAX TRP VIIII COS IIII PP

PONTIF MAX TRP X COS IIII PP

(Plate I, 12)

(6) Roma

EX SC in field. Roma, helmeted, standing r. with l. foot on helmet, l. holding round shield which rests on l. knee, r. inscribing it. Legends:

PONTIF MAX TRP VII COS IIII PP

PONTIF MAX TRP VIII COS IIII PP

PONTIF MAX TRP VIIII COS IIII PP

PONTIF MAX TRP X COS IIII PP

(Plate I, 13)

(7) Victory

VICT AVG Victory standing l., r. holding round shield.

(8) Augustus Germanicus

AVGVSTVS GERMANICVS Nero radiate and togate standing facing, r. holding branch, l. victory on globe

(Plate I, 22).

(9) AugustusAugusta

AVGVSTVS AVGVSTA To l., Nero radiate and togate standing l., r. holding patera, l. a long sceptre; to r., Empress veiled standing l., r. holding patera, l. a cornucopiae (Plate I, 23).

(10) ConcordiaAugusta

CONCORDIA AVGVSTA Concordia seated l. on low stool, r. holding patera, l. a cornucopiae (Plate I, 24).

(11) Jupiter Custos

IVPPITER CVSTOS Jupiter with cloak round lower limbs seated l. on throne, r. holding thunderbolt, l. a long sceptre (Plate I, 25).

(12) Janus temple

IANVM CLVSIT PACE PR TERRA MARIQ PARTA

Closed door of the temple of Janus (Plate I, 26).

(13) Seated Roma (ex.)

ROMA in exergue. Roma helmeted seated l. on cuirass, with r. foot back resting on helmet; r. holding victory, l. resting on parazonium (Plate II, 27).

(14) Salus (ex.)

SALVS in exergue. Salus seated l. on throne, r. holding patera, l. resting on side (Plate II, 28).

(15) Vesta

VESTA Front view of temple of Vesta. In center, figure of Vesta seated, r. holding patera, l. a long sceptre (Plate II, 29).

(16) Seated Roma (fd.)

ROMA across field. Otherwise as (13).

(17) Salus (fd.)

SALVS across field. Otherwise as (14) (Plate II, 68).

(18) Eagle and Standards

Legionary eagle between two standards

(Plate II, 69).

(21) Adlocutio

ADLOCVT COH in exergue. To r., low platform, from which Nero, standing l., accompanied by the praetorian prefect, addresses three soldiers standing in single file r., the front two carrying standards. In background, a domed building.

ROME: Sest. Issue II, without SC (Plate II, 76) Issue III, SC

LUGD: Sest. Issues L-III-VI, SC (Plate XII, 405)

(22) Annona

ANNONA AVGVSTI CERES To r., Ceres seated l., l. holding torch, r. corn ears: facing her, Annona standing r., dressed in tunic and outer garment that falls below her waist, l. holding cornucopiae; between them, garlanded altar on which stands modius; in background, prow of corn ship r.

ROME: Sest. Issue II, without SC (Plate II, 71) Issue III, SC

LUGD: Sest. Issues L-III-VI, SC (Plate XIII, 406)

(23) Congiarium l.

On l., high platform on which Nero seated r.; in front, an attendant seated r. at top of ladder distributing largess to a citizen who stands l. with one foot on rungs: behind the citizen, little boy standing l.;

in background on l., figure of Minerva, r. holding owl and 1. spear; on r., figure of Liberalitas standing 1. on lower pedestal, r. holding tessera.

ROME:

Sest. Issue II, without SC, CONG II DAT POP R

CONG II DAT POP

Issue III, SC, CONG II DAT POP

(Plate III, 106)

CONG I DAT POP (Plate III, 106(1))

LUGD:

Sest. Issues L-IVA-VI, SC, CONG I DAT POP

(Plate XIII, 432)

(24) Congiarium r.

On r., low platform on which Nero seated l.; behind, praefectus annonae standing facing; in front, an attendant standing l. handing tessera to citizen standing r.; in background, statue of Minerva standing l., r. holding owl, l. spear; behind to l., low building with flat roof.

ROME:

Sest. Issue II, without SC, CONG II DAT POP Issue III, SC, CONG II DAT POP

(Plate III, 88)

LUGD:

Sest. Issue L-IV, SC, CONG II DAT POP

(25) Decursio r.

DECVRSIO in exergue. Nero cuirassed and with short tunic, r. holding spear, riding on horse prancing r.; behind him soldier on horseback r., carrying vexillum at the slope over r. shoulder.

ROME: Sest. Issue II, without SC

Issue III, SC (Plate IV, 108)

LUGD: Sest. Issues L-IVA-VI, SC

(Plate XIV, 474)

(26) Decursio l.

DECVRSIO in exergue. As (25), but Nero and attendant riding l.

ROME: Sest. Issue L-III, SC (Plate IV, 109)

(27) Decursio Vex.

DECVRSIO in exergue. Nero cuirassed and with short tunic, r. holding spear, riding on horse prancing r.; two attendants on foot in front and behind, the one in front carrying a vexillum.

ROME:

Sest. Issue II, without SC (Plates II, 74, III, 78) Issue III, SC

(28) Janus TERRA door r.

PACE PR TERRA MARIQ PARTA IANVM CLVSIT, SC 1. and r. in field. View of temple of Janus "closed door right," showing the front, a closed door with wreath hung across the top, and left-hand side with latticed window.

ROME: Sest. Issues IV–V (Plate V, 165)

Issue VI

Dup. Issue IV (Plate VIII, 218)

As. Issue IV (Plate XI, 283)

LUGD: Sest. Issues L-IVB–VI (Plate XIII, 419)

As. Issues L-IVA–V (Plate XIX, 563)

(29) Janus TERRA door l.

PACE PR TERRA MARIQ PARTA IANVM CLVSIT, SC

l. and r. in field. View of temple of Janus "closed door left," showing the front, a closed door with wreath hung across top, and right-hand side with latticed window.

ROME: Sest. Issues IV–V

Issue VI (Plate V, 171)

Dup. Issue L-IV As. Issue L-IV

(30) Ostia

Bird's eye view of harbor at Ostia. At the top, pharos surmounted by statue of Neptune; below, reclining figure of Tiber l., l. holding dolphin, and r. rudder; on r., crescent-shaped row of breakwaters; on l., crescent-shaped mole with porticoes; in the harbor, a varying number of ships.

ROME: Sest. Issue III AVGVSTI POR OST SC

(Plate III, 105)

AVGVSTI PORT OST SC LUGD: Sest. Issues L-IV–VI PORT AVG SC

(Plate XIII, 420)

(31) Roma, vict. and paraz.

ROMA in exergue, SC l. and r. in field. Roma seated l. on cuirass, r. holding victory and resting l. hand on parazonium; behind the cuirass a pile of arms, different on different specimens.

ROME: Sest. Issues IV–V (Plate IV, 16o)

Dup. Issue IV (Plate VIII, 220)

LUGD: Sest. Issues L-IVB–VI (Plate XIII, 428)

(31a) Roma, vict. and shield l.

ROMA in exergue, SC l. and r. in field. As (31) but resting l. hand on shield.

ROME: Sest. Issue IV

Dup. Issue IV A

(32) Roma vict. and spear.

ROMA in exergue, SC l. and r. in field. Roma seated l. on cuirass, r. holding victory, l. spear.

ROME: Sest. Issues IV–V (Plates IV, 155, V, 172) Dup. Issue IV-V

(32 a) Roma wreath and spear

As (32), but Roma holding wreath instead of victory. ROME: Dup. Issue VI

(33) Roma shield l.

ROMA in exergue, SC l. and r. in field. Roma seated l. on cuirass, r. holding spear, resting l. arm on shield. ROME: Sest. Issue VI (Plate V, 168)

Dup. Issue VI (Plate IX, 240)

(34) Roma shield r.

ROMA in exergue, SC l. and r. in field. Roma seated r. on cuirass, l. holding spear, resting r. arm on shield.

ROME: Sest. Issue VI (Plate V, 169)

Dup. Issue VI

(35) Arch

SC l. and r. in field. Triumphal arch, wreath hung across front and l. side; above, the Emperor in facing quadriga escorted by Victory on r. and Peace on l.; on extreme r. and l., two small figures of soldiers; on l., a statue of Mars in niche.

ROME: Sest. Issue III (Plate III, 101)

LUGD: Sest. Issues L-IVA–VI (Plate XIV, 452)

(36) Macellum

Front view of the Macellum Magnum.

ROME: Dup. Issue II no legend, without SC

(Plate VI, 180)

Issue II MAC AVG, SC and īī

(Plate VIII, 207)

LUGD: Dup. Issues L-III–IVA MAC AVG, SC

(Plate XIV, 493)

(37) Securitas

SECVRITAS AVGVSTI Securitas seated r. on throne, 1. holding sceptre and resting r. elbow against throne. In front, garlanded and lighted altar against which leans lighted torch resting on bucranium. ROME: Dup. Issue II, without SC (Plate VI, 183) Issue III, SC and īī (Plate VII, 198) LUGD: Dup. Issues L-III–IVA, SC and īī

(Plate XV, 494)

Issues L-IVB–V, SC

(Plate XVII, 525)

Issues L-VI, SC in exergue

(Plate XVII, 535)

(38) Victoria l.

VICTORIA AVGVSTI Victoria draped, flying l., with her r. leg well forward and clear of her drapery, r. holding wreath and l. palm.

ROME: Dup. Issue II, without SC (Plate VII, 185)

Issue III, SC and īī (Plate VII, 205)

LUGD: Dup. Issue L-III, SC and ī

(Plate XV, 496)

(Plate XV, 496)

(39) Victoria l. wk.

VICTORIA AVGVSTI Victoria walking l., r. holding wreath, l. a palm, with r. leg shrouded in folds of her drapery. Beneath, a ground line.

LUGD: Dup. Issues L-III–IVA, SC and īī

(Plate XV, 495)

Issues L-IVB–VI, SC

(Plate XVII, 518)

(40) Victoria r.

VICTORIA AVGVSTI Victoria draped, flying r., with r. leg well forward and clear of drapery, r. holding wreath and l. palm.

ROME: Dup. Issue III, SC and īī (Plate VII, 200)

(41) Janus VBIQ door r.

PACE PR VBIQ PARTA IANVM CLVSIT, SC l. and r. View of the temple of Janus "closed door right," showing the front, a closed door with wreath hung across top, and left-hand side with latticed window. ROME: Dup. Issues IV–V (Plate VIII, 235)

Issue VI

C. As. Issues L-IV–V (Plate XI, 288)

(42) Janus VBIQ door l.

PACE PR VBIQ PARTA IANVM CLVSIT, SC l. and r. View of the temple of Janus "closed door left," showing the front, a closed door with wreath hung across top, and right-hand side with latticed window. ROME: Dup. Issues IV–V

Issue VI (Plate IX, 238)

C. As. Issues IV–V

Issue VI (Plate XI, 300)

(43) Roma wreath and parazonium

ROMA in exergue, SC l. and r. Roma seated l. on cuirass, r. holding wreath and resting l. hand on parazonium.

ROME: Dup. Issues IV–V (Plate VIII, 225)

(44) Apollo

Nero laureate advancing r., in flowing robes of Apollo citharoedus, l. holding lyre, r. playing it. Various legends:

  • PONTIF MAX TR POTEST IMP PP
  • PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP
  • PONTIF MAX TR P IMP PP

ROME: C. As. Issue I, anepigraphic, without SC

(Plate IX, 242)

Legend (c), without SC (Plate IX, 246)

Or. As. Issue II, Legend (b), without SC

(Plate IX, 257)

Issue III, Legends (a), (b) and (c), SC and ī (Plate X, 262), (b), (c)

LUGD: Or. As. Issues L-III, Legend, (b) SC and ī

(Plate XVII, 539)

C. As. Transitional group, Legend (b), SC and ī

(Plate XVIII, 542)

Issues L-IVA–IVB, Legend (b), SC (Plate XVIII, 547)

(45) Ara

ARA PACIS in exergue, SC l. and r. The wall of an altar enclosure, behind which are horns l. and r. The wall has four decorated panels and a narrow door in the center.

LUGD: C. As. Issues L-II–IV (Plate XVIII, 561)

(46) Genius

GENIO AVGVSTI Genius standing l., l. holding cornucopiae, r. holding patera in act of sacrificing over a lighted altar l.

ROME: C. As. Issue I, without SC

(Plate IX, 255)

Or. As. Issue II, without SC

(Plate X, 261)

Issue III, SC and ī (Plate X, 267)

LUGD: Or. As. Issues L-III, SC and ī

(Plate XVIII, 538)

C. As. Issues L-IVA–V, SC

(Plate XVIII, 544)

(47) Victory

SC l. and r. Victory draped flying l., holding in both hands a shield inscribed SPQR*

ROME: As. Issues IV–VI (Plate XI, 290)

LUGD: As. Issues L-IV–V (Plate XIX, 574)

(48) Roma

Roma seated l. on cuirass, r. holding wreath and resting l. hand on parazonium as in (31), but with legends:

  • MAX TRIB POT PP
  • PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP
  • PONTIF MAX TR P IMP PP
  • PONTIF MAX TR POT PP
  • PONTIF MAX TR P PP
  • PON MAX TRP IMP PP
  • PON MA TRP IMP PP
  • P M TRP PP
  • TRIB POT PP
  • TR PON PP
  • TR POT PP

ROME: C. Sem. Issue IA, without SC, anepigraphic

Issue IB, without SC

(Plate XII, 304)

Or. Sem. Issue III, SC and S

(Plate XII, 331)

LUGD: C. Sem. Issue L-IVB, SC

(Plate XX, 608)

Issue L-V, SC (Plate XX, 626)

(49) Table

A gaming table ornamented by two griffins. On it, urn l. and wreath r. Against its central leg rests a round shield. Legends:

  • CERTAMEN QVINQ ROM CON
  • CERTAMEN QVINQ ROM CO
  • CERTAM QVINQ ROM CO
  • CERTA QVINQ ROM CON
  • CERTA QVINQ ROM CO
  • CERT QVINQ ROM CON
  • CERT QVINQ ROM CO
  • CER QVINQ ROMAE CONS
  • CER QVINQ ROMAE CON
  • CER QVINQ ROM CON
  • CER QVINQ ROM CO
  • CER QVINQ RMA CO

ROME: C. Sem. Issue I, without SC

(Plate XII, 307)

Or. Sem. Issue III, SC, S

(Plate XII, 327)

LUGD: Or. Sem. Issues L-III, SC

(Plate XX, 604)

C. Sem. Issues L-IVA–V, SC

(Plate XX, 609)

(50) Branch

A laurel branch.

ROME: C. Q. Issue I, without SC

(Plate XII, 337)

Or. Q. Issue II, without SC

(Plate XII, 338)

Or. Q. Issue III, SC, sometimes

(Plate XII, 349)

C. Q. Issue IV, SC (Plate XII, 360)

(51) Column

A helmet placed r. on column; to r. a shield resting against column; behind, a spear pointing upward to r.

ROME: C. and Or. Q. sometimes as obverse, sometimes as reverse type. (Plate XII, 362)

(52) Victory r. Pallas

Victory advancing right, holding small figure of Pallas in r., and palm 1., SC 1. and r. in field.

ROME: Sest. Last Issue.

The principal forms of obverse legend on the aes are:

  • NERO CLAVD(IVS) CAESAR AVG GER(M) PM TRP IMP PP
  • IMP NERO CLAVD(IVS) CAESAR AVG GER(M) PM TRP PP
  • IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P(ONTIF) M(AX) TR(IB) P(OT) PP
  • NERO CLAVD(IVS) CAESAR AVG GER(MANICVS)

The variable elements in each of these forms are italicized. Entries in the catalogue for coins with these legends quote the appropriate reference letter followed by specification of these variable elements. The catalogue cites in full all other obverse legends.

Variations in the representation of the emperor's head, as bare, laureate or radiate are noted under the heading for each issue. Where more than one form is employed during an issue, the relevant form is additionally noted at each catalogue entry. Other attributes such as the aegis or globe are treated in a similar way. On sestertii at Rome, most right facing heads in issues II to IV prove on close inspection to have traces of an aegis, although it is sometimes indistinct, especially on worn coins. But in issues V and VI there seem to be several right facing sestertius portraits that genuinely omit the aegis. At Lugdunum there is invariably a globe in front of the emperor's head on all denominations, although this is sometimes omitted from descriptions.

End Notes

*
One As in the ANS (Cat. 475) has the letters SCPR on the shield.

Reverse Types

(Foldout Section)

Throughout the catalogue, the reverse type for each entry is indicated by a simple description with a reference number in brackets that refers to the fuller description of the type that is given in this foldout section. Variable features within each reverse type, such as the absence or presence of SC and marks of value,are noted under the heading for each issue, or against each entry where more than one form is employed in an issue. Of the reverse types listed in the foldout, types 1 to 18 are those of the gold and silver, and types 21 to 52 are those of the aes denominations.

Rome : Aurei

No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
Mint of Rome
PRE-REFORM AUREI
DIVVS CLAVDIVS a.d. 54/55
1. DIVVS CLAVDIVS AVGVSTVS Head of Claudius, laur. l. TR P a.d. Dec. 54 (1) Quadriga BM, P, V 1 4f.
*2. AGRIPP AVG DIVI CLAVD NERONIS CAES MATER Confronted busts of Nero r., Agrippina l. (2) Wreath NERONI CLAVD DIVI F CAES AVG GERM IMP TRP + BM, P, V 9 1f.
TR P COS
a.d. 55
*3. NERO CLAVD DIVI F CAES AVG GERM IMP TRP COS Jugate busts of Nero and Agrippina r. (3) Chariot + BM, P, V 10 7
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC bmc
TRP II–TRP X a.d. 55/56–63/64 Head bare r.
*4. NERO CAESAR AVG IMP (2) Wreath TRP II BM, P, V 18 9f.
5. (2) Wreath TRP III + BM, P, V 19 12f.
6. (2) Wreath TRP III COS II Maz, cast in BM 20
7. (2) Wreath TRP II II + BM, P, V 21 15
8. (2) Wreath TRP V + BM, P, V 22 17ff.
9. (2) Wreath TRP VI + BM, P, V 24 21f.
*10. (2) Wreath TRP VII + BM, P, ANS 25 23
*11. (4) Ceres TRP VII + BM, P, V 26 25
*12. (5) Virtus TRP VII + BM, P, V 27 27
*13. (6) Roma TRP VII + BM, P, V 28 29
*14. (4) Ceres TRP VIII BM, V, PW II 29 31
15. (5) Virtus TRP VIII + BM, P, V 30 33f.
16. (6) Roma TRP VIII + BM, V, C 31 36
17. (4) Ceres TRP VIII + BM 32 39
18. (5) Virtus TRP VIIII + BM, P, V 33 40f.
*19. (6) Roma TRP VIIII + BM, V, H 34 43
*20. (5) Virtus TRP X + BM, P, V 35 45f.
21. (6) Roma TRP X + BM, P, V 36 49ff.
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
POST-REFORM AUREI
Issue I Without IMP a.d. 64/66 Head laur r.
*22. NERO CAESAR (8) Augustus Germanicus + BM, P, V 42 56ff.
*23. NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS (9) AugustusAugusta + BM, P, V 41 52f.
*24. (10) Concordia Augusta + BM, P, V 43 61, 62
*25. (11) Jupiter Custos + BM, P, V 45 67ff.
*26. (12) Janus Temple + BM, P, V 44 64ff.
*27. (13) Seated Roma (ex.) + BM, P, V 50 81f.
*28. (14) Salus (ex.) + BM, P, V 52 87ff.
*29. (15) Vesta + BM, P, V 58 101ff.
Issue II IMP as praenomen a.d. 67 Head laur. r.
*30. NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS (11) Jupiter Custos + BM, P, V 46 77f.
*31. (14) Salus (ex.) + BM, ANS, BM 53 94f.
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
Issue IIIa IMP as praenomen PP a.d. 68 Head laur. r.
32. NERO CAESAR AVG PP (11) Jupiter Custos + BM, Ox, Mor 47 79
33. (14) Salus (ex.) + P, V, Trau 54
PRE-REFORM GOLD QUINARIUS
TRP II Head bare r. a.d. 55/56
34. NERO CL DIVI F CAES AVG PM TRP II (7) Victory BM 17 11
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
PRE-REFORM DENARII
DIVVS CLAVDIVS a.d. 54/55 Head of Claudius laur. l.
35. DIVVS CLAVDIVS AVGVSTVS TRP a.d. Dec. 54 (1) Quadriga BM, V, Ox 1 6
36. AGRIPP AVG DIVI CLAVD NERONIS CAES MATER Confronted busts of Nero r., Agrippina l. TRP COS a.d. 55 (2) Wreath as 2 BM, V, Ox 9 3
37. NERO CLAVD DIVI F CAES AVG GERM IMP TRP COS Jugate busts of Nero and Agrippina r. TRP II–TRP X a.d. 55/56 to 63/64 (3) Chariot BM, V, Ox 10 8
38. NERO CAESAR AVG IMP Head bare r. (2) Wreath TRP II P,P 18
39. (2) Wreath TRP III BM, P, ANS 19 14
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
40. (2) Wreath TRP IIII BM, P, Ox 21 16
41. (2) Wreath TRP V BM, V, Ox 22 20
42. (2) Wreath TRP VI H 24
43. (2) Wreath TRP VII BM, P, Ox 25 24
44. (4) Ceres TRP VII BM, P, ANS 26 26
45. (5) Virtus TRP VII P, V 27
46. (6) Roma TRP VII BM, P, V 28 30
47. (4) Ceres TRP VIII BM, P 29 32
48. (5) Virtus TRP VIII BM, P, Ox 30 35
49. (6) Roma TRP VIII BM, P, ANS 31 37f.
50. (5) Virtus TRP VIIII BM 33 42
51. (6) Roma TRP VIIII BM 34 44
52. (5) Virtus TRP X BM, P, V 47f.
53. (6) Roma TRP X P
POST-REFORM DENARII
Issue I Without IMP a.d. 64/66 Head laur. r.
54. NERO CAESAR NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS (8) Augustus Germanicus + BM, P, V 42 60
55. (9) AugustusAugusta + BM, P, V 41 54f.
56. (10) Concordia Augusta BM, P, V 43 63
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
57. (11) Jupiter Custos BM, P, V 45 74ff.
58. (12) Janus Temple Mun
59. (13) Seated Roma (ex.) + BM, P, V 50 83ff.
60. (14) Salus (ex.) BM, P, V 52 90ff.
61. (15) Vesta + BM, P, V 58 104ff.
Issue II IMP as praenomen a.d. 66/67 Head laur. r.
62. IMP NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS (11) Jupiter Custos + BM, P, V 46
63. (13) Seated Roma (ex.) Mil
64. (14) Salus (ex.) + BM, P, V 53 96f.
Issue IIIa IMP as praenomen PP a.d. 67/68 Head laur. r.
*65. IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PP (11) Jupiter Custos BM, P, V 47 80
*66. (14) Salus (ex.) + BM, P, V 54 98
Issue IIIb IMP as praenomen. New rev. types a.d. 68 Type and Leg. as 3a
67. (16) Seated Roma (fd.) BM, P, M 51 86
*68. (17) Salus (fd.) + BM, P, V 56 99f.
*69. (18) Eagle and standards + BM, P, V 60 107f.
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
SESTERTII
Issue I No sestertii
Issue II Without SC. IMP as cognomen a.d. 63 Head laur. r. aegis or laur. l.
70. A. CLAVDIVS … GERM r. (21) Adlocutio P, F 70
*71. (22) Annona + RT, P, RV 86
72. (23) Congiarium l. F, G (S)
73. (24) Congiarium r. Ox, Sim
*74. (27) Decursio Vex. + Mil, V, P 146
75. (25) Decursio r. RT 138
*76. A. CLAVDIVS … GERM l. (21) Adlocutio V (BM), S 71 126
77. (22) Annona + RV, Ox, C 87
*78. (27) Decursio Vex + P, G, BM 145 155
79. A. CLAVD … GERM r. (27) Decursio Vex RV, BM 144 154
80. (25) Decursio r. BM (M)
81. A. CLAVD … GERM r. (21) Adlocutio BM (Sig)
82. (23) Congiarium l. 1 V, P (RV) 118
83. A. CLAVD … GER r. (27) Decursio Vex Ox
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
Issue III SC. IMP as cognomen a.d. 64 Head laur. r. aegis or laur. l.
84. A. CLAVDIVS … GERM r. (21) Adlocutio BM, G, V 66 124f.
85. (22) Annona + P, RT, Ox 78
86. (30) Ostia X, X
87. (23) Congiarium l. BM, 1 PW I 2 117 138
*88. (24) Congiarium r. + V, BM, Ox 123 140
89. (25) Decursio r. + BM, ANS, Vie 133 146
90. (35) Arch + RV, V, Cam 154
91. A. CLAVDIVS … GERM l. (21) Adlocutio P 67
92. (22) Annona RT, MRA 77a
93. (24) Congiarium r. MU, RT (P) 124 141
94. (25) Decursio r. BM (Ox), Ox 133 147
95. (35) Arch BM (S), Vie 155 190
96. A. CLAVD … GERM r. (21) Adlocutio Mil, M 64
97. (30) Ostia Lau 99
98. (23) Congiarium l. P 1 (ANS) 3 111
98a. (23) Congiarium l. Bah 4 115
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
99. (24) Congiarium r. RT, V
100. (25) Decursio r. + Ox, Ly, Hir 26 130
*101. (35) Arch + C, N, Cam 150
102. A. CLAVD … GERM l. (21) Adlocutio P 65
102 A. (35) Arch N
103. A. CLAVDIVS … GER r. (21) Adlocutio Hir 11, Bah
104. (22) Annona + BM, P, S 76 130
*105. (30) Ostia + V, RT, Ox 88 134
*106. (23) Congiarium l. + N, 2 V, 1 P 1
107. (24) Congiarium r. BM, P, M 122 139
*108. (25) Decursio r. P, BM, ANS 131 143f.
*109. (26) Decursio l. + P, BM, Ox 141 148ff.
110. (27) Decursio Vex N
111. (35) Arch + BM, RV, M 152 185ff.
112. A. CLAVDIVS … GER l. (22) Annona P, X (Hall) 75
113. (30) Ostia + BM, P, N 96 135
114. (25) Decursio r. + RT, H, Bem 132 145
115. (26) Decursio 1. + BM, Vie, Vau 140 152f.
116. (27) Decursio Vex G (Die)
117. (35) Arch + BM, P, N 153 188f.
118. A. CLAVD … GER r. (21) Adlocutio BM (P), N 61 122f.
119. (22) Annona + BM, Ox, Al 74 127f.
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
120. (30) Ostia + BM, P, N 90 131f.
121. (23) Congiarium l. 1 G, N (D)
122. (24) Congiarium r. Ox, Sa 121
123. (25) Decursio r. RV, Ox, Cam 129
124. (26) Decursio l. H, N, B
125. (27) Decursio Vex Ox, Lob
126. (35) Arch + BM, N, Ox 148 183
127. A. CLAVD … GER l. (21) Adlocutio Bem, Bas 1
128. (22) Annona + BM, Con, RV 74 129
129. (30) Ostia P, PW I (Hir 12) 92
130. (23) Congiarium l. 1 Pr
131. (25) Decursio r. BM, N, RC 127 142
132. (26) Decursio l. ANS, P (PW II) 139
133. (27) Decursio Vex P 142
134. (35) Arch BM, O, Mil 147 184
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
Issue IV SC. IMP as cognomen Head laur. r. aegis or laur. l. a.d. 65 Roma and Janus temple types.
*135. NERO CAESAR AVG IMP TR POT XIP PP cuir. r. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. Ox (Maz) 205
*136. (28) Janus TERRA door r. N (BM) (RT) 170 111f.
137. A. CLAVDIVS … GER r. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. + BM, P, RT 211 180
138. (32) Roma vict. and spear BM, RT (RV) 219 170
139. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + P, H, Ox 179 161
140. (29) Janus TERRA door l. + BM, P, RT 161 164f.
141. A. CLAVDIVS … GER l. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. + P, Ox, RV 210
142. (32) Roma vict. and spear Mil (M), Man
143. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + Ox, V, Hall 180
144. (29) Janus TERRA door l. + P, RT, Cam 160
145. A. CLAVD … GER r. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. + BM, P, RT 208 173ff.
146. (32) Roma vict. and spear + Ox, BM, Tib 168f.
147. (31a) Roma vict. and shield l. RT, V 222
148. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + BM, Ox, N 172 156ff.
149. (29) Janus TERRA door l. + Ox, S, Al
150. A. CLAVD … GER l. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. + P, RT, Ox 206 178f.
151. (32) Roma vict. and spear P, Ox 218
152. (31 a) Roma vict. and shield l. Syd 222
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
153. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + P, RT, Ox 171 160
154. (29) Janus TERRA door l. RT (AC 16)
Issue V IMP as praenomen a.d. 66 Head laur. r. or laur. l.; right heads sometimes have aegis
*155. B. CLAVDIVS … GER r. (32) Roma vict. and spear RT, AC 13 221
156. (28) Janus TERRA door r. PW II
157. (29) Janus TERRA door l. P (RV) (PW I) 166
158. B. CLAVDIVS … GER l. (32) Roma vict. and spear T
158A. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. Man
159. (29) Janus TERRA door l. BM, Pri 167
*160. B. CLAVD … GER r. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. + BM, RT, R, Tib 212 181f.
161. (32) Roma vict. and spear + BM, P, RT 220 171f.
162. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + BM, P, N 182 162
163. B. CLAVD … GER l. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. + Cam, V, P 212
163A. (31a) Roma vict. and shield l. VV
164. (32) Roma vict. and spear + BM, Mun, Sch 220
*165. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + P, RT, Cam 182 163
166. (29) Janus TERRA door l. BM
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
Issue VI IMP as praenomen. TRP XIII a.d. 67 Head laur. r. or l.
167. B. CLAVD … GERM r. (32) Roma vict. and spear Her, N, O
*168. (33) Roma shield l. + V, P, BM 233 114ff.
*169. (34) Roma shield r. C, Mun, Be 238
170. (28) Janus TERRA door r. BM 113
*171. (29) Janus TERRA door l. + N, V, RT 167
*172. B. CLAVD … GER l. (32) Roma vict. and spear C (5) (Her)
173. (33) Roma shield l. Har, Mor
174. (34) Roma shield r. BM 119
174A. (29) Janus TERRA door l. P
Last Issue IMP as praenomen. TRP XIV a.d. 68 Bust draped l. crowned with bay
175. B. CLAVD … GER … XIV l. (52) Victory and palm Wal 333
176. (33) Roma shield l. M
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
DUPONDII
Issue I No dupondii
Issue II Without SC. No mark of value. IMP as cognomen a.d. 63 Head bare, laur., or rad., r. or l.
*177. A. CLAVDIVS … GERM bare r. (38) Victoria l. Wal 300
178. A. CLAVDIVS … GERM bare l. (38) Victoria l. S
*179. A. CLAVDIVS … GERM laur. r. (38) Victoria l. Bl (O), O
*180. A. CLAVD … GERM laur. r. (39) Macellum BM, P (Cam) 281 196
*181. A. CLAVDIVS … GERM rad. r. (38) Victoria l. Ox (N)
182. A. CLAVDIVS … GERM … IMPP rad. r. (38) Victoria l. S
182A. A. CLAVDIVS … GER rad. r. (37) Securitas Cha
*183. A. CLAVD … GERM rad. l. (37) Securitas V (C) (Ox)
*184. A. CLAVD … GERM … IMPP rad. r. (36) Macellum BM, C (ANS) 282 197
*185. (38) Victoria l. BM (F) (Ox) 299 221
*186. A. CLAVD … GER rad. r. (36) Macellum RT (P)
*187. (37) Securitas Cam
*188. (38) Victoria l. RT 298
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
Issue III SC and mark of value Π. IMP as cognomen a.d. 64 Head rad. r. or l.
189. A. CLAVDIVS … GERM r. (36) Macellum N
190. (37) Securitas P. Sof 297
191. (38) Victoria l. + BM, V, Cam 311 220
192. A. CLAVD … GERM r. (36) Macellum T
193. (37) Securitas + P, H, ANS 294
194. (38) Victoria l. Cuz (Maz) Her 309
195. A. CLAVD … GERM l. (37) Securitas H (RT) 294
196. (38) Victoria l. BM (P), Ox 309 219
197. A. CLAVDIVS … GER r. (36) Macellum BM (P) (RV) 279 195
*198. (37) Securitas + P, V, RT 295 213
199. (38) Victoria l. + P, Cam, Mun 310
*200. (40) Victoria r. + BM, P, V 1
201. A. CLAVDIVS … GER l. (37) Securitas + P, H, Hel 1929 295
202. (36) Macellum Man, M
203. A. CLAVD … GER r. (36) Macellum + BM, 2 P, H 278 191f.
204. (37) Securitas + V, RV, Mil 292
*205. (38) Victoria l. + BM, RV, Cam 308 214ff.
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
206. (40) Victoria r. + BM, P, RT 312 222
*207. A. CLAVD … GER l. (36) Macellum BM (RV), H 278 193f.
208. (38) Victoria l. V, ANS 308
209. (40) Victoria r. BM (Mor) 312 223
Issue IVA SC, no mark of value, Sestertius types a.d. 65 IMP as cognomen Head laur. r. or rad. r. or l.
*210. 1 A. CLAVD … GER laur. r. (28) Janus TERRA door r. BM 174 199
*211. 1 (31) Roma vict. and paraz. BM 225 1 207 2
*212. 1 (37) Securitas BM (Ox) 289 212
213. A. CLAVDIVS … GER rad. r. (28) Janus TERRA door r. Cam 181
214. (29) Janus TERRA door l. P 162
215. A. CLAVD … GER rad. r. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + BM, P, RV 177 198
216. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. + P, RV, C 209
217. (31 a) Roma vict. and shield l. BM
217A. (32) Roma vict. and spear l. BM
*218. A. CLAVD … GER rad. l. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + BM, RT, Bl 177 200
219. (29) Janus TERRA door l. Her
*220. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. + BM, Ox, Mil 209 210
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
Issue IV B SC, no mark of value. Distinctive depondius types a.d. 65 IMP as cognomen. Head rad. r. or l.
221. A. CLAVDIVS … GER r. (43) Roma wreath and paraz. G 226
222. (42) Janus VBIQ door l. + Ox, M, BM 192 203
223. A. CLAVDIVS … GER l. (43) Roma wreath and paraz. P
224. A. CLAVD … GER r (41) Janus VBIQ door r + BM, M, Mil 200
*225. (43) Roma wreath and paraz. + BM, P, RV 224 205f.
*226. A. CLAVD … GER l. (41) Janus VBIQ door r. BM (RT), Bah 200 201
227. (43) Roma wreath and paraz. BM, P, V 224 208
Issue V IMP as praenomen, undated a.d. 66 Head rad. r. or l.
228. B. CLAVD … GER rad. r. (28) Janus TERRA door r. Wi
229. (29) Janus TERRA door l. ANS
230. (40) Victoria r. īī BM 314 224
231. (41) Janus VBIQ door r. P, Ox (V) 201
232. (42) Janus VBIQ door l. P, ANS 193
233. (43) Roma wreath and paraz. P, RT, F 227
234. (32) Roma vict. and spear BM, M (Mun)
*235. B. CLAVD … GER rad. l. (41) Janus VBIQ door r. BM, V 201 202
236. (42) Janus VBIQ door l. BM, M, Y 193 204
*237. (43) Roma wreath and paraz. BM RC) H) 227 209
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
Issue VI IMP as praenomen TRP XIII a.d. 67 Head rad. or l.
*238. B. CLAVD … GERM XIII r. (42) Janus VBIQ door l. + G, V, V 197
239. (32 a) Roma wreath and spear ANS 228
*240. (33) Roma shield l. BM, P, V 234 120f.
241. (34) Roma shield r. Mes
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
ASSES
Issue IA Copper without SC. Head bare r. or l. a.d. 62 Anepigraphic Apollo
*242. A. CLAVDIVS … GERM r. (44) Apollo P 375
243. A. CLAVD … GERM r. (44) Apollo Wal, Sig, Im 374
244. A. CLAVD … GERM l. (44) Apollo BM, Ox 374 238
245. A. CLAVD … GERM … IMP r. (44) Apollo RT (G)
Issue IB Copper without SC. Head bare r. or l. a.d. 62 Reverse types of Apollo and Genius
*246. D. CLAVDIVS … GERMANIC r. (44) Apollo TRP + P, Ox, BM 351 235
247. D. CLAVDIVS … GERMANIC l. (44) Apollo TRP + P, F, Ox 351
248. D. CLAVDIVS … GERMAN r. (44) Apollo TRP Ox, R, Tib
249. D. CLAVDIVS … GERMA r. (44) Apollo TRP + C, Mz, Syd 350
*250. D. CLAVDIVS … GERMA l. (44) Apollo TRP BM, P 236
251. A. CLAVDIVS … GERM l. (46) Genius Maz
252. A. CLAVD … GERM r. (46) Genius + RT, Mz, Ox 337
253. A. CLAVD … GERM … IMP P r. (46) Genius M
254. A. CLAVD … GER r. (44) Apollo TRP BM 353 234
*255. (46) Genius RT 336
256. A. CLAVD … GER laur. r. (46) Genius Mer 335
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
Issue II Orichalcum without SC. No mark of value a.d. 63 Head laur. or rad. r.
*257. D. CLAVDIVS … GERMANICVS laur. r. (44) Apollo TR POT C (Cam) V 356
*258. (46) Genius V
259. D. CLAVDIVS … GERMANICVS rad. r. (44) Apollo TRPOT M
*260. D. CLAVD … GERMANIC rad. r. (44) Apollo TRPOT V (BM) (P) 257
*261. A. CLAVD … GERM rad. r. (46) Genius V (BM), G
Issue III Orichalcum with SC and mark of value T a.d. 64 Head laur. or rad. r.
*262. D. CLAVDIVS … GERMANIC laur. r. (44) Apollo TR POTEST V (G) (RT) 1 258
263. (44) Apollo TR POT G, RC (Hir 34)
264. (44) Apollo TR P H, (V)
265. (46) Genius Ox (Mil)
266. A. CLAVDIVS … GER laur. r. (46) Genius V
*267. A. CLAVD … GERM laur. r. (46) Genius Cam (Mil) (P)
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
267 A. A. CLAVD … GERM … IMPP laur. r. (46) Genius Dr 1921
268. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP laur. r. (46) Genius P (RV) (C)
269. A. CLAVD … GER laur. r. (46) Genius + BM, G, Vog 344 252
270. A. CLAVD … GERM rad. r. (44) Apollo TRPOT Ox (F) (RV)
271. (46) Genius Ox (P) (Mil) 346 253 1
*272. D. CLAVDIVS … GERMANIC rad. r. (44) Apollo TRPOT H (V) BM 373 256
273. D. CLAVD … GERMANICVS rad. r. (44) Apollo TRP V(B) 1
274. D. CLAVD … GERMANIC rad. r. (44) Apollo TRP Hah
275. D. CLAVD … GERMANI rad. r. (44) Apollo TRP BM (P) (RC) 368 254
*276. A. CLAVD … GER rad. r. (46) Genius + C, P, BM 345 251
Issue IV A Copper. IMP as cognomen Long obverse legend a.d. 65 Head bare r., or laur. r. or l.
277. A. CLAVD … GER bare r. (28) Janus TERRA door r. Ox, F 174
*278. A. CLAVDIVS … GER laur. r. (47) Victory BM, P 322 240
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
278A. (42) Janus VBIQ door l. M
279. A. CLAVD … GER laur. r. (47) Victory + BM, May, B
280. (28) Janus TERRA door r. N (RT)
281. (29) Janus TERRA door l. Her
282. A. CLAVD … GER laur. l. (47) Victory Ox
Issue IVB 1 Copper. IMP as cognomen Short obverse, but long reverse legend a.d. 65 Head laur. r. or l.
*283. NERO CAESAR AVG GERM IMP r. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + BM, P, Ox 169 225
284. (29) Janus TERRA door l. + BM, P, B 159 226
285. (47) Victory + BM, V, RT 318 241ff.
286. NERO CAESAR AVG GERM IMP l. (28) Janus TERRA door r. Ox, ANS
287. (47) Victory + BM, RT, H 318 245
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
Issue IV C Copper. IMP as cognomen Short obverse and short reverse legend a.d. 65 Head laur. r. or l.
*288. NERO CAESAR AVG GERM IMP r. (41) Janus VBIQ door r. + BM, P, Ox 198 227
289. (42) Janus VBIQ door l. + BM, P, RV 191 232
*290. (47) Victory + BM, V, RT 318 241ff.
291. NERO CAESAR AVG GERM IMP l. (41) Janus VBIQ door r. + BM, P, RV 1 198 228f.
292. (42) Janus VBIQ door l. Mil, ANS
293. (47) Victory + BM, RT, H 318 245
293A. NERO CAESAR AVG GER IMP r. (42) Janus VBIQ door l. S
Issue V Copper. IMP as praenomen a.d. 66 Head laur. r. or l.
*294. IMP NERO CAESAR AVG GERM 2 r. (41) Janus VBIQ door r. + BM, P, V 203 230
295. (42) Janus VBIQ door l. + BM, RV, Ox 194
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
*296. (47) Victory BM, P, RV 325 246ff.
297. IMP NERO CAESAR AVG GERM l. (41) Janus VBIQ door r. + BM, P, RT 203 231
298. (42) Janus VBIQ door l. + BM, B, Her 194
299. (47) Victory + V, H, Ox 325 249
Issue VI Copper. IMP as praenomen a.d. 67 Head laur. r.
*300. IMP NERO CAESAR AVG GERMANIC r. (42) Janus VBIQ door l. + BM, H, Mun 196 233
*301. (47) Victory + BM, P, Ox 327 250
302. IMP NERO CAESAR AVG GERMANIC 1. (41) Janus VBIQ door r. Her
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
SEMISSES
Issue I Copper. Without SC Rev. type of Roma (48) or Table (49) a.d. 62 Head laur. r.
303. A. CLAVDIVS … GERM r. (48) Roma AC 15
*304. D. CLAVDIVS … GERMANIC r. (48) PON MAX TRP IMP PP G (Wal) (Mz)
305. D. CLAVDIVS … GERM r. (48) PON MAX TRP IMP PP BM (C) (Vie) 260
306. A. CLAVDIVS … GERM r. (49) [CERTAMEN QVINQ ROM CO. P (N) (Ox) 408
*307. (49) [CERTAM QVINQ ROM CO. G (BM) (Vau) 407 259
Issue II No semisses
Issue III Orichalcum with SC. Usually with mark of value S Rev. type of Roma (48) or Table (49) a.d. 64 Head laur. r., occasionally bare r.
308. NERO CLAV CAE AVG GER PM TRP IM laur. r. (49) CERTA OVINO ROM CO. S. BM (P) (ANS) 404 274
309. NERO CLAV CAE AVG GER PM TRP IM bare r. (49) CERTA QVINQ ROM CO. S. RT (N) (Bl)
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
310. NERO CAESAR AVG IMP TR POT PP laur r. (49) CERT OVINO ROM CO. S. BM (RV) (C) 400 270
311. (49) CER QVINQ ROM CO. P (RV) (BM) 381
312. NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMA bare r. (49) CERT QVINQ ROM CO. S. BM (RT) (Ox) 399 269
313. (49) CER QVINQ ROM CO. Ox 385
314. NERO CLAVD CAESAR GER laur. r. (49) CERT QVINQ ROM CON. S. Ox
315. (48) PON MA TRP IMP PP BM (RT) (Ox) 280
316. NERO CAESAR AVG IMP laur. r. (49) CERTA QVINQ ROM CON. S. BM (RV) (Ox) 406
317. (49) CER QVINQ ROM CO. S. + Ox, RT, Rec 379 267
318. (48) Roma S TR POT PP H, BM (RV) 271 283
319. NERO CAESAR AVG IMP laur. l. (49) CER QVINQ ROM CO. S. Her
320. NERO CAES AVG IMP laur. r. (49) CERTA QVINQ ROM CON. S. + BM, P, RV 405 275ff.
321. (49) CERTA QVINQ ROM CON. BM, Ox (H)
322. (49) CERTA QVINQ ROM CO. S. + BM, P, Mil 403 273
323. (49) CERT QVINQ ROM CON. S. Ox, BM, B 402 271f.
324. (49) CERT QVINQ ROM CO. S V (N) (Ox)
325. (49) CER QVINQ ROM CO. S + BM, P, RV 378 261ff.
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
326. (49) CER QVINQ ROM CO BM 265
*327. (49) CER QVINQ RMA CO. S BM, P, C 377 268
328. (48) PON MA TRP IMP PP Ox, P
329. (48) PM TRP PP S + BM, RT, Ox 244 279
330. (48) TR PON PP S + BM, RT, Ox 268 284
*331. (48) TR POT PP S + Bo, BM, RV 270 281f.
332. NERO CAE AVG IMP laur. r. (49) CERT QVINQ ROM CON. S BM (RT) (Cam) 401
333. (49) CERT QVINQ ROM CO. S N (Lau)
334. (49) CER QVINQ ROM CO. S BM, T 380 266
335. (48) TR PON PP S BM 267 285

Rome: Quadranies

No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
QUADRANTES
Issue I Copper. Without SC Obv. Owl or Column a.d. 62 Rev. Olive Branch (50)
336. NERO CLAVD1VS CAESAR AVG GERM Col PON M TRP IMP PP P (Ox) (RV) 434
*337. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG Col GER PON MAX TRP IMP PP G, RC, V 419 286
Issue II Orichalcum. Without SC Obv. Owl or Column a.d. 63 Rev. Olive Branch (50)
*338. NERO CLAV CAESAR AVG GER Col PON M TRP IMP PP V, RV (Man)
339. NERO CLA CAE AVG GERM Col PM TRP IMP PP BM 293
340. NERO CLA CAE AVG GER Col PM TRP IMP PP BM 292
340A. NERO CL CAE AVG GER Owl PM TRP IMP PP ANS
Issue III Orichalcum. With SC Types as Issue II a.d. 64 Sometimes with rev. mark of value ∵
*341. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG Col GER PM TRP IMP PP ∵ + V, P, BM 418
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
342. NERO CLAV CAE AVG Owl + BM, P, RT 1 411 298ff.
342A. NERO CLAV CAE AVG Owl + RV, N, RC
343. NERO CLAV CAESAR AVG GER Col BM 416 297
344. NERO CLA CAE AVG GER Owl P 410
345. NERO CL CAE AVG Col PON M TRP IMP PP ∵ V 435
346. NERO CLAV CAE AVG Owl PM TRP IMP PP BM, V, (RT) 412 302
347. NERO CL CAE AVG Col P (RV) ANS 423
347A. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG Col Maz
348. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GE Col BM 431
*349. NERO CLA CAE AVG GER Owl RV
349A. NERO CLA CAE AVG GER Owl BM, P
350. NERO CLAV CAE AVG GER Col + Cam, Mil, RC
351. NERO CLAV CAE AVG GER Owl Cam
352. NERO CLA CA AVG GER Owl BM 413 301
353. NERO CLAV CAE AVG GER Col + BM, RC, RV 428 294
*354. NERO CLAV CAE AVG GER Owl + RV, G, H 414
355. NERO CLA CAES AVG GER Col P 425
356. NERO CL CAE AVG GER Col P (BM) (RD) 424 291
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
Issue IV A Copper with SC. No Mark of value Obv. Owl or Column a.d. 65 Rev. Olive Branch (50)
357. NERO CLAVD CAES AVG GER Owl PM TRP IMP PP Bl 415
358. NERO CLAVD CAE AVG GER Col + BM, RV, B 287
359. NERO CLAV CAE AVG GER Col + L, B, Bl 428
*360. NERO CLAV CAE AVG GER Owl + V, BM, Bl 414 288f.
Issue IV B Copper with SC. No mark of value a.d. 65 Rev. type (51) Column
361. NERO CLAV CAE AVG GER Owl PM TRP IMP PP image P
*362. NERO CLAV CAE AVG GER Owl PM TRP IMP PP image BM, Bi, T 290
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
Lugdunum
SESTERTII
Issue L–III IMP as cognomen a.d. 65 Head laur. r., globe and aegis
401. A. CLAVD … GER IMP PP r. (21) Adlocutio RV
402. (22) Annona + BM, ANS, BM 306 1
Issue L–IV A IMP as cognomen a.d. 65 Head laur. r. or 1., early globe
403. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP P r. (25) Decursio r. AC 13, Hall
403A. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP P l. (21) Adlocutio P
404. (22) Annona RT
*405. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP PP r. (21) Adlocutio BM (P) (Ry) 303
*406. (22) Annona + BM, H, Mil 305
407. (23) Congiarium l. S
408. (25) Decursio r. + BM, Cir, T 311
409. (31) Roma, vict. and paraz. + P, Ox, Hall
410. (35) Arch + V, Ox, RV
411. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP PP l. (21) Adlocutio + C, G, Sof
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
412. (22) Annona + T, Sof, B
413. (25) Decursio r. Ly
414. (35) Arch + BM, P, Ox 1 330
Issue L-IVB IMP as cognomen a.d. 65 Head laur. r. or l., more developed globe
415. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP PP r. (21) Adlocutio + Ox, B, Bem 62f.
416. (22) Annona + G, RT, P 73
417. (23) Congiarium l. B, Ox (V) 109
418. (25) Decursio r. + Ox, BM, M 128 312 f.
*419. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + BM, Ox, M 173 319
*420. (30) Ostia + Sa, P, Ox 101 323
421. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. + BM, P, RV 207 324f.
422. (35) Arch + BM, P, Ox 149 329
423. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP PP l. (22) Annona + BM, P, S 73 307
424. (23) Congiarium l. + H, P, Hall 110
425. (25) Decursio r. + H, S, P 2 128
426. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + Ox, B, ANS 173 320
427. (30) Ostia BM 102
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
*428. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. + Ox, P, B 207
429. (35) Arch V 149
Issue L–V IMP as praenomen Longer forms of obverse legend a.d. 66 Head laur. r. or l. globe
430. C. PONTIF MAX TRIB POT PP r. (21) Adlocutio Mun (B) (N) 69
431. (22) Annona M (Ly) Lob 83
*432. (23) Congiarium l. V 114
433. (24) Congiarium r. BM (B) (Schey) 126 310
434. (25) Decursio r. BM (P) (RT) 137 318
435. C. PONTIF MAX TRIB POT PP l. (22) Annona V, Nim
436. (28) Janus TERRA door r. BM (Ox) 188 322
437. C. PONT MAX TR POT PP r. (21) Adlocutio M, Al (Ox)
438. (22) Annona ANS, Mon 81
*439. (23) Congiarium l. + BM, ANS, BM 113 308
440. (25) Decursio r. Hall 136
441. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + P, M, BM 187 321
*442. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. Ox (BM) S of 216 327
443. (35) Arch BM, AC 15 157 332
444. C. PONT MAX TR POT PP l. (21) Adlocutio + BM, RT, Ox 68 304
445. (22) Annona + V, P, Ox 82
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
446. (23) Congiarium l. + RT, Sig, Lau
447. (24) Congiarium r. P 125
448. (25) Decursio r. + BM, P, V 136 316f.
449. (28) Janus TERRA door r. Ox, Bl (P) 187
450. (30) Ostia Hof 105
451. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. + BM, M, RC 216 328
*452. (35) Arch + BM, P, Ox 157 333f.
453. C. PONT MAX TR P PP r. (22) Annona Cahn 60
454. (23) Congiarium l. BM
455. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. M
456. (35) Arch AC 15
457. C. P MAX TRIB POT PP l. (21) Adlocutio M
458. (30) Ostia Ram
Issue L–VI IMP as praenomen Shorter forms of obverse legend a.d. 67 Head laur. r. or l., globe
459. C. P. MAX TR POT PP r. (21) Adlocutio M
460. (22) Annona + P, M, Al
461. (23) Congiarium l. Bel
462. (25) Decursio r. BM (B), ANS 315
463. (28) Janus TERRA door r. Al
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
464. (30) Ostia Hall 104
465. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. Faur 215
466. (35) Arch BM 156 331
467. C. P. MAX TR POT PP l. (21) Adlocutio ANS
468. (22) Annona P, MRA 80
469. (25) Decursio r. + BM, RT, C 135
470. (30) Ostia + MRA, Al, Ram
471. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. Ox, Her 215
472. (35) Arch Ox, P (H) 156
473. C. P MAX TR P PP r. (22) Annona + R, RT, ANS 79
*474. (25) Decursio r. + V, BM, P 134 314
475. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + V, Ox, M
476. (30) Ostia V
477. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. + BM, B, S 213 326
478. (35) Arch H
479. C. P MAX TR P PP 1. (22) Annona Ox, V (N)
480. (25) Decursio r. M
481. (28) Janus TERRA door r. B 184
482. (30) Ostia P 103
483. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. Ox, RT (W) 214
484. C. P M TR POT PP r. (22) Annona Her
485. (25) Decursio r. Col
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
486. C. PM TR POT PP r. (31) Roma vict. and paraz. M
487. C. PM TR POT PP l. (22) Annona M
488. (25) Decursio r. M
489. C. PM TR P PP r. (22) Annona M, H
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
DUPONDII
Issue L–III IMP as cognomen Securitas īī, Victoria īī, Macellum a.d. 64 Head rad. r., globe
*490. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP P r. (36) Macellum P (L) Man
491. (37) Securitas + BM, May, May
*492. (39) Victoria l. wk. + P, Ox, May
*493. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP PP r. (36) Macellum + BM, LG, Wui, Al 276 335
*494. (37) Securitas + Ox, BM, Pte LG 291 338
*495. (39) Victoria l. wk. + G, Bl, Webb 307
*496. (38) Victoria l. BM, Cir (May)
Issue L-IVA IMP as cognomen Securitas īī, Victoria īī, Macellum. a.d. 65 Head laur. r. or l., globe
497. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP l. (37) Securitas Mun
498. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP P r. (36) Macellum + RT, Mun, Her
499. (37) Securitas Bl 293
500. (39) Victoria l. wk. P, Ly 306
*501. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP P l. (36) Macellum + P, Mun, Mil
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
*502. (37) Securitas H (BM), Al
*503. (39) Victoria l. wk. + Bl, BM, P 306 350
504. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP PP r. (36) Macellum RV, ANS 277
505. (37) Securitas + Ox, RV, Her 290
506. (39) Victoria l. wk. + G, BM, P
507. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP PP l. (36) Macellum + BM, P, N 277 336f.
508. (37) Securitas + Ox, BM, P 290 339
509. (39) Victoria l. wk. + RT, Ox, P 351
510. A. CLAVDIVS … GER … IMP P r. (37) Securitas May 296
511. (39) Victoria l. wk. RV
Issue L–IVB IMP as cognomen Secuntas and Victoria a.d. 65 Head laur. r. or l., globe
512. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP P r. (37) Securitas Ox
513. (39) Victoria l. wk. + BM, P, Ox
514. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP P l. (39) Victoria l. wk. BM, P
*515. A. CLAVD … GER r. (37) Securitas Ox, BM (P) 285
516. (39) Victoria l. wk. + Ox, B, Nij 301
517. A. CLAVD … GER l. (37) Securitas + P, BM, Ox 285 340
*518. (39) Victoria l. wk. + BM, Cam, Man 301 352
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
Issue L–V IMP as praenomen Secuntas and Victoria image a.d. 66 Head laur. r. or l., globe
519. C. P MAX TR POT PP r. (37) Securitas + H, ANS, Lob 287
520. (39) Victoria l. wk. + Ox, Mil, Glen 2
521. C. P MAX TR POT PP l. (37) Securitas BM (H) (Ox) 287 343
522. (39) Victoria l. wk. + Ox, P, Cam 305
523. C. P MAX TR P PP r. (37) Securitas + BM, P, RV 286 341
524· (39) Victoria l. wk. + BM, P, RT 304 353ff.
*525. C. P MAX TR P PP l. (37) Securitas + BM, Her, B 286 342
526. (39) Victoria l. wk. + BM, P, RV 304 356ff.
Issue L–VI IMP as praenomen Secuntas image Victoria image 1 a.d. 67 Head laur. r. or l., globe
527. C. P MAX TR POT PP r. (37) Securitas ANS, Bl
528. (39) Victoria l. wk.
529· C. P MAX TR POT PP l. (37) Securitas + P, Bl, Cahn 69
530. (39) Victoria 1. wk.
531. C. P MAX TR P PP r. (31) Securitas + BM, P, RT 344ff.
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
532. (39) Victoria l. wk.
*533. C. P MAX TR P PP l. (37) Securitas + Ox, BM, P 347ff.
*534. (39) Victoria l. wk. + BM, Bl, Col
*535. C. P M TR P PP r. (37) Securitas Ox
536. (39) Victoria l. wk. May, MRA 303
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
ASSES
Issue L–III Orichalcum. Rev. mark of value ī a.d. 64 Head laur r. globe, l. without globe
537. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANI r. (44) Apollo V (Her) (Fr)
*538. (46) Genius BM (Cir) P 347
*539. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANIC l. (44) Apollo BM (H) (V) 370 255
*540. (46) Genius P
Transitional Group Copper. Rev. mark of value ī a.d. 64 Head bare r. or l., globe
*541. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS r. (44) Apollo TRPOT C (May), May
*542. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS l. (44) Apollo TRPOT BM (P), May 372 237
Issue L–IV A Copper. No mark of value a.d. 65 Head bare r. or l. globe
543. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS r. (44) Apollo TRPOT + Cam, BM, P 364 376
*544. (46) Genius BM ( May ), Al 368
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
545. (28) Janus TERRA door r. SHer 178
546. (47) Victory + May, May,May 324
*547. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS l. (44) Apollo TRPOT + BM, P, RT 364 377
548. (45) Ara May
549. (46) Genius Tr 343
550. (47) Victory + May, ANS, 1 May 323
551. NERO CSAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICV r. (44) Apollo TRPOT SVer 364
551A. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICV l. (44) Apollo TRPOT Bl
Issue L–IVB Copper. IMP as cognomen a.d. 65 Head bare r. or l., globe
552. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP r. (44) Apollo TRPOT P
553. (45) Ara Newd
554. (46) Genius Ve, May
555. (28) Janus TERRA door r. Cam
556. (47) Victory Ox, San (May) 319
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
557. A. CSAVD … GER … IMP l. (44) Apollo TRPOT Ox
558. (45) Ara May
559. (46) Genius BM, H
560. (47) Victory + RT, May, May 319
*561. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP P r. (45) Ara + BM, V, Bl 360
562. (46) Genius + BM, P, May 367
*563. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + BM, Bl, SVer 374
564. (47) Victory + Ox, P, RV 320
565. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP P l. (44) Apollo TRPOT Mac
566. (45) Ara + Ox, Mil, May
*567. (46) Genius + BM, G, B 369
568. (28) Janus TERRA door r. Mil (Car), P
569. (47) Victory + P, H, Her
570. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP PP r. (44) Apollo TRPOT + P, Ox, May 1 365
571. (45) Ara + P, Ox, V 315 360 ff.
572. (46) Genius + BM, B, May 338 366
573. (28) Janus TERRA door r. P, Mun (W) 176
*574. (47) Victory BM, Ox, Mil 321 378 f.
575. A. CLAVD … GER … IMP PP l. (44) Apollo TRPOT May 365
576. (45) Ara + BM, P, ANS 315 363
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
577. (46) Genius + Cir, May, G
578. (28) Janus TERRA door r. P, Bl 176
579. (47) Victory + BM, P, Ox 321 380
Issue L–V IMP as praenomen a.d. 66 Head bare r. or l., globe
580. C. PONTIF MAX TRIB POT PP r. (46) Genius May (Y)
581. (47) Victory BM 331 390
582. C. PONTIF MAX TRIB POT PP l. (45) Ara May
583. (47) Victory May 331
*584. C. P MAX TR POT PP r. (45) Ara + BM, M, M 317 365
585. (46) Genius P, BM
586. (28) Janus TERRA door r. Ox (RT), Cir
587. (47) Victory + BM, P, V 330 389
588. C. P MAX TR POT PP l. (45) Ara Ly, Col (Cam) 317
589. (47) Victory W, May
590. C. P MAX TR P PP r. (45) Ara + P, N, B 317
*591. (46) Genius + BM, Ox, RT 342 370
592. (28) Janus TERRA door r. + BM, P, May 185 375
*593. (47) Victory + BM, P, V 329 381 ff.
594. C. P MAX TR P PP l. (45) Ara P, P 317
595. (46) Genius + BM, P, RT 342 371
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
596. (47) Victory + BM, P, RV 329 387 f.
597. C. P MAX TR PP l. (47) Victory Sp
598. C. PMTR POT PP r. (45) Ara + BM, RT, Ox 316 364
*599. (28) Janus TERRA door r. BM, P, May 183
599A. (47) Victory P
600. C. P M TR P PP r. (46) Genius H
601. (47) Victory LG, Tr
Issue L–VI a.d. 67 Victory as Issue V 1
602. C. P MAX TR P PP r. (47) Victory + BM, P, V 329 381
603. C. P MAX TR P PP l. (47) Victory + BM, P, RV 329 387
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
SEMISSES
Issue L–III Orichalcum Rev. type of Table (49) a.d. 64 Head laur. r. globe
*604. NERO CLAV CAESAR AVG | (49) CER QVIN ROM CON P (BM) (ANS)
Issue L–IV A Copper. Full legend GERMANICVS Rev. types of Roma (48) or Table (49) a.d. 65 Head bare r. or l., globe
605. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMAN ICVS r. (48) PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP BM
606. (48) PONTIF MA TR P IMP PP Mac
607. (49) CER QVINQ ROM CON Ox (L), ANS
*608. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS l. (48) PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP BM (Ox) 262 401
*609. (49) CER QVINQ ROMAE CONS BM (RT) (Ox) 397 396
Issue L-IVB Copper. Shorter abbreviation of GERMANICVS Rev. types of Roma (48) or Table (49) a.d. 65 Head bare r. or l., globe
610. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMAN l. (48) PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP Bl
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
611. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMA r. (48) PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP Nij, ANS
612. (48) PONTIF MAX TR P IMP PP BM, P
613. (49) CER QVINQ ROM CON V (RT) (Bl) 391
614. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM r. (48) PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP BM (S) (M) 260 399
*615. (48) PONTIF MAX TR P IMP PP + BM, Ox, G 253
*616. (49) CER QVINQ ROM CON BM (SV er), Bl 388
617. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM l. (48) PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP BM 260 400
618. (48) PONTIF MAX TR P IMP PP + Ox, BM, H 253 398
619. (49) CER QVINQ ROM CON + BM, P, V 389 392
Issue L–V Copper. IMP as praenomen Rev. types of Roma (48) and Table (49) a.d. 66 Head bare r. or l., globe
620. IMP NERO CAESAR AVG r. (48) PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP BM, Ox (Mun) 263 402
621. (48) PONTIF MAX TR POT PP Bl 257
622. (48) PONTIF MAX TR P PP Ox, P 252
623. (49) CER QVINQ ROM CON Mor
624. IMP NERO CAESAR AVG l. (48) PONTIF MAX TR POT PP BM (M) (Ox) 257 403
No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC BMC
625. IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONTIF r. (48) PONTIF MAX TR POT PP BM, 1 ANS 2 259
*626. (48) MAX TRIB POT PP + V, RT, Webb 242
627. (49) CER QVINQ ROMAE CON M 396
628. IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONTIF l. (48) MAX TRIB POT PP Webb 242
629. (49) CER QVINQ ROMAE CON P (Ox) (C) 396
*630. IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONT r. (48) MAX TRIB POT PP H, (P) (M) 241
630A. (48) PONTIF MAX TR POT PP Maz
*631. (49) CER QVINQ ROMAE CON + RV, BM, Ox 395 393
632. IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONT l. (49) CER QVINQ ROMAE CON BM, M 395
633. IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX r. (48) TRIB POT PP BM (P) (RT) 272 404

End Notes

1
Reads CONG īī DAT POP R
1
Reads CONG īī DAT POP SC
2
Reads CONG ī DAT POP SC
3
Reads CONG ī DAT POP SC RIC 112, BMC 136
4
Reads CONG īī DAT POP SC RIC 116, BMC 137
1
Reads CONG ī DAT POP
1
A dupondius of this type in the Almirall Coll. and another in Madrid with the same obv. but different rev. dies both have the unbarred mark of value II.
2
Without mark of value. Cf. RIC 274
1
These coins are illustrated on Plate XXIII.
2
RIC 225 (quoting the BM coin BMC 207) has been reworked. The wreath held by Roma seems to have been substituted for the original victory.
1
A further example in the BM from the same obv. and rev. dies is struck on a dupondius flan.
1
No mark of value in the exergue.
1
There is no external feature to distinguish Victory asses of Issue IV B from those of issue IVC, but they seem to have been struck concurrently with the two Janus temple types (see p. 83).
1
A coin in Oxford with these legends is struck on an undressed sestertius flan.
2
Obv. dies of this issue (one with head r., the other with head l.) have been used to strike a curious two-headed coin in the ANS.
1
An example in the ANS has an additional SC on the obverse under the altar. A coin in Turin, and another in Oxford with these legends, are struck on a copper As flan.
1
The aegis is omitted in the BMC description.
1
An example in the Hermitage with these types and legends has obv. legend reading outwardly image
2
An example in Madrid with these types has the obv. legend reading outwardly image
1
There is no external feature to distinguish Victoria dupondii of Issue VI from those of Issue V, but the study of dies demonstrates that the Victoria type was struck concurrently with the new Securitas type of Issue VI
1
On this coin the legend on the shield is SCPR. See RIC 232
1
The coin in Mayenne has CLAD (sic) for CLAVD.
1
There is no simple feature to distinguish Victory Asses of Issue VI from those of Issue V, but there are good reasons for supposing that the Victory Asses were struck parallel with the sestertii and dupondii of Issue VI (see p. 107).
1
This BM coin (formerly in the Walters Coll.) is in orichalcum and weighs 8.45 gm. It seems to be an orichalcum As flan struck with copper semis dies.
2
The end of the obverse legend of this ANS coin is not clear.

Patterns and Trial Strikings

In addition to the varieties that form part of the normal issues of Nero, there are some extremely rare coins in good style, sometimes die-linked with the normal varieties of regular issues, which seem to have been intended as trial strikings or patterns. Some are uniface; others are struck on the flan of a different denomination—presumably because such flans were readily available from current or recent minting operations, whereas flans for the denominations for which the new dies were being prepared may not have been available; others are overstruck on coins of closely contemporary date with different types.

The following seem to have been intended as trial strikings or patterns:

Cat. no. Dies Flan Wt. Coll.
ROME 70 ft. Sest. Obv. (uniface) Sest. Hel 1927
197 ff. Dup. Obv. (uniface) Sest. 29.54 gm. BM (Plate XXII, q)
262 O. As Dup. 15.55 gm. BM
291 C. As Sest. 29.47 gm. Ox
306/7 C. Sem. Obv. C. As 14.94 gm. BM (Plate XXII, r)
306/7 (overstrike) C. Sem. Obv. (overstrike) C. As S
342 C. Q. C. As T (Plate XXII, s)
342 f. C. Q. C. As 10.24 gm. Ox (Plate XXII, t)
LUGDUNUM 430 ff. Sest. Obv. (uniface) Sest. RV
452 Sest. (overstrike) C. As 8.25 gm. BM (Plate XXII, o)
625 C. Sem. O. As BM (Plate XXII, r)

Index of Legends—Gold and Silver

(Reference is to the Catalogue numbers)

AGRIPP AVG DIVI CLAVD NERONIS CAES MATER Aur. 2, 3
Den. 36, 37
AVGVSTVS AVGVSTA Aur. 23
Den. 55
AVGVSTVS GERMANICVS Aur. 22
Den. 54
CONCORDIA AVGVSTA Aur. 24
Den. 56
DIVVS CLAVDIVS AVGVSTVS Aur. 1
Den. 35
EX SC Aur. 1–21
Den. 35–53
IANVM CLVSIT PACE PR TERRA MARIQ PARTA Aur. 26
Den. 58
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PP Aur. 32–33
Den. 65–69
IMP NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS Aur. 30–31
Den. 62–64
IVPPITER CUSTOS Aur. 25, 30, 32
Den. 57, 62, 65
NERO CAESAR Aur. 22
Den. 54
NERO CAESAR AVG IMP Aur. 4–21
Den. 38–53
NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS Aur. 23–29
Den. 55–61
NERO CL DIVI F CAES AVG PM TRP II Quin. 34
NERO CLAVD DIVI F CAES AVG GERM IMP TRP COS Aur. 3
Den. 37
NERONI CLAVD DIVI F CAES AVG GERM IMP TRP Aur. 2
Den. 36
PONTIF MAX TRP II PP Aur. 4
Den. 38
PONTIF MAX TRP III PP Aur. 5
Den. 39
PONTIF MAX TRP III COS II PP Aur. 6
PONTIF MAX TRP IIII PP Aur. 7
Den. 40
PONTIF MAX TRP V PP Aur. 8
Den. 41
PONTIF MAX TRP VI COS IIII PP Aur. 9
Den. 42
PONTIF MAX TRP VII COS IIII PP Aur. 10–13
Den. 43–46
PONTIF MAX TRP VIII COS IIII PP Aur. 14–16
Den. 47–49
PONTIF MAX TRP VIIII COS IIII PP Aur. 17–19
Den. 50–51
PONTIF MAX TRP X COS IIII PP Aur. 20–21
Den. 52–53
ROMA Aur. 27
Den. 59, 63, 67
SALVS Aur. 28, 31, 33
Den. 60, 64, 66, 68
VESTA Aur. 29
Den. 61
VICT AVG Quin. 34

Index of Legends—Aes

(Reference is to the Catalogue numbers)

ADLOCVT COH Sest. 70, 76, 81
ADLOCVT COH SC Sest. 84, 91, 96, 102, 103, 118, 127, 401, 403A, 405, 411, 415, 430, 437, 444, 457, 459, 467
ANNONA AVGVSTI CERES Sest. 71, 77
ANNONA AVGVSTI CERES SC Sest. 85, 92, 104, 112, 119, 128, 402, 404, 406, 412, 416, 423, 431, 435, 438, 445, 453, 460, 468, 473, 479. 484. 487. 489
ARA PACIS SC C. As 548, 553, 558, 561, 566, 571, 576, 582, 584, 588, 590, 594, 598
AVGVSTI POR OST SC Sest. 86, 97, 105, 113, 120, 129
CERTAMEN QVINQ ROM CO C. Sem. 306
CERTAM QVINQ ROM CO C. Sem. 307
CERTA QVINQ ROM CON S SC O. Sem. 316, 320
CERTA QVINQ ROM CON SC O. Sem. 321
CERTA QVINQ ROM CO S SC O. Sem. 308, 309, 322
CERT QVINQ ROM CON S SC O. Sem. 314, 323, 332
CERT QVINQ ROM CO S SC O. Sem. 310, 312, 324, 333
CER QVINQ RMA CO S SC O. Sem. 327
CER QVINQ ROMAE CONS SC C. Sem. 609
CER QVINQ ROMAE CON SC C. Sem. 627, 629, 631, 632
CER QVINQ ROM CON SC C. Sem. 607, 613, 616, 619, 623
CER QVINQ ROM CO S SC O. Sem. 317, 319, 325, 334
CER QVINQ ROM CO SC O. Sem. 311, 313, 326
CER QVIN ROM CO SC O. Sem. 604
CONG īī DAT POP R Sest. 82
CONG īī DAT POP Sest. 72, 73
CONG īī DAT POP SC Sest. 87, 88, 93, 99, 106, 107, 122, 130, 433, 447
CONG ī DAT POP SC Sest. 87, 98, 106, 121, 407, 417, 424, 432, 439, 446, 454, 461
DECVRSIO Sest. 74, 75, 78, 79, 80, 83
DECVRSIO SC Sest. 89, 94, 100, 108–110, 114–116, 123-125, 131–133, 403, 408, 413, 418, 425, 434, 440, 448, 462, 469, 474, 480, 485, 488
GENIO AVGVSTI C. As 251–253, 255, 256
O. As 258, 261
GENIO AVGVSTI SC C. As 544, 549, 554, 559, 562, 567, 572, 577, 580, 585, 591, 595. 600
O. As 265–269, 271, 276, 538, 540
GER PM TRP IMP PP SC O. Q. 341–344
GER PON MAX TRP IMP PP C. Q. 337
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG GERMANIC C. As 300–302
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG GERM C. As 294–299
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONTIF MAX TRIB POT PP Sest. 430–436
C. As 580–583
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONTEIF C. Sem. 625–9
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONT MAX TR POT PP Sest. 437–452
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONT MAX TR P PP Sest. 453–456
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TRIB POT PP Sest. 457–458
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TR POT PP Sest. 459–472
Dup. 519–522, 527–530
C. As 584–589
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TR P PP Sest. 473–483
Dup. 523–526, 531–534
C. As 590–596, 602–603
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX TR P P C. As 597
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX C. Sem. 633
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P M TR POT PP Sest. 484–488
C. As 598–599
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P M TR P PP Sest. 489
Dup. 535–536
C. As 600–601
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONT C. Sem. 630–632
IMP NERO CAESAR AVG C. Sem. 620–624
IMP NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP PP Sest. 155–159
IMP NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TR P PP Sest. 160-166
Dup. 228–237
IMP NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP XIII PP Sest. 167–174
Dup. 238–241
IMP NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP XIV PP Sest. 175–176
MAC AVG Dup. 180, 184, 186
MAC AVG SC Dup. 189, 192, 197, 202, 203, 207, 490, 493, 498, 501, 504, 507
MAX TRIB POT PP SC C. Sem. 628, 630
NERO CAESAR AVG GERM IMP C. As 283–293
NERO CAESAR AVG IMP TRPOT XI PPP Sest. 135–136
NERO CAESAR AVG IMP TRPOT PP O. Sem. 310–311
NERO CAESAR AVG IMP O. Sem. 316–319
NERO CAES AVG IMP O. Sem. 320–331
NERO CAE AVG IMP O. Sem. 332–333
NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP Sest. 70–78, 84–95
Dup. 177–179, 181, 189–191
C. As 242, 152
C. Sem. 303, 306, 307
NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP P Dup. 182
NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP Sest. 103–117, 137–144
Dup. 197–202, 213, 214, 221–223
O. As 266
C. As 278
NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP P Dup. 510, 511
NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS O. As 257–259
NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMANIC C. As 246, 247
O. As 262–265, 272
C. Sem. 304
NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMAN C. As 248
NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMA C. As 249, 250
O. Sem. 312, 313
NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM C. Sem. 305
C. Q. 336
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP PP Sest. 79–82, 96–102
Dup. 180; 183, 184, 192-196
C. As 243, 244, 252
O. As 261, 267, 270, 271
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP P Dup. 185
C. As 253
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP IMP C. As 245
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP Sest. 83, 118–134, 145–154. 401, 402, 405–429
Dup 493–496, 504-509, 515–518
C. As 254–256, 277, 279–282, 570–579
O. As 269, 276
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP P Sest. 403–404
Dup. 185, 490–492, 498–503, 512–514
C. As 253, 561–569
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP Dup. 497
O. As 268
C. As 552-560
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS C. As 541–550
O. As 273
C. Sem. 605–609
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICV C. As 551
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANIC O. As 260, 274, 539, 540
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANI O. As 275, 537, 538
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMAN C. Sem. 610
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMA C. Sem. 611–613
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM C. Sem. 614–619
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER O. Sem. 314, 315
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GE O. Q. 348
NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG C. Q. 337
O. Q. 341
NERO CLAVD CAES AVG GER C. Q. 357
NERO CLAVD CAE AVG GER C. Q. 358
NERO CLAV CAE AVG GER PM TRP IM O. Sem. 308, 309
NERO CLAV CAESAR AVG GER O. Q. 338. 343
NERO CLAV CAESAR AVG O. Sem. 604
NERO CLAV CAE AVG GER O. Q. 350. 351. 353. 354
C. Q. 359–362
NERO CLAV CAE AVG O. Q. 342, 346
NERO CLA CAES AVG GER O. Q. 355
NERO CLA CAE AVG GERM O. Q. 339
NERO CLA CAE AVG GER O. Q. 340. 344. 349. 349A
NERO CLA CA AVG GER O. Q. 352
NERO CL CAE AVG GER O. Q. 340A, 356
NERO CL CAE AVG O. Q. 345. 347
PACE PR TERRA MARIQ PARTA IANVM CLVSIT SC Sest. 136, 139, 140, 143, 144, 148, 149, 153, 154, 156, 157, 159, 162, 165, 166, 170, 171, 149, 426, 436, 441, 449, 463, 475, 481
Dup. 210, 213–215, 218, 219, 228, 229
C. As 277, 280, 281, 283, 284, 286, 545, 555, 563, 568, 573, 578, 586, 592, 599
PACE PR VBIQ PARTA IANVM CLVSIT SC Dup. 222, 224, 226, 231, 232, 235, 236, 238
C. As 288, 289, 291, 292, 294, 295, 297, 298, 300, 302
PONTIF MAX TR POTEST IMP PP SC O. As 362
PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP O. As 257, 259, 260
PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP SC C. As 541–543. 547. 551, 552. 557. 565. 570. 575
O. As 263, 270, 272, 537, 539
C. Sem. 605, 608, 610, 611, 614, 617, 620
PONTIF MAX TR P IMP PP C. As 246–250, 254
PONTIF MAX TR P IMP PP SC O. As 264, 273-275
C. Sem. 612, 615, 618
PONTIF MAX TR POT PP SC C. Sem. 621, 624, 625
PONTIF MAX TR P PP SC C. Sem. 622
PONTIF MA TR P IMP PP SC C. Sem. 606
PON MAX TR P IMP PP C. Sem. 304, 305
PON MA TR P IMP PP SC O. Sem. 315, 328
PON M TR P IMP PP c. Q. 336
PON M TR P IMP PP SC C. Q. 338
O. Q. 345
P M TRP IMP PP O. Q. 339–340A.
P M TRP IMP PP SC C. Q. 357–362
O. Q. 346–356
P M TRP PP S SC O. Sem. 329
PORT AVG SC Sest. 420, 427, 450, 458, 464, 470, 476, 482
ROMA SC Sest. 135, 137, 138, 141, 142, 145–147. 150–152, 155. 158. 160, 161, 163, 164, 167–169, 172–174, 176, 409, 421, 429, 442, 451, 455, 465, 471, 477, 483, 486
Dup. 211, 216, 217, 220, 221, 223, 225, 227, 233, 234, 237, 239–241
SC Sest. 90, 95, 101, 111, 117, 126, 134, 175, 410, 414, 422, 429, 443, 452, 456, 466, 472, 478
SCPR SC C. As 550
SECVRITAS AVGVSTI Dup. 183, 187
SECVRITAS AVGVSTI SC Dup. 190, 193, 955, 198, 201, 204, 212, 491, 494, 497, 499, 502, 505, 508, 510, 512, 505, 517, 509, 521, 523, 525, 527, 529, 531, 533, 535
SPQR SC C. As 278, 279, 282, 285, 287, 290, 293, 296, 299, 301, 546, 550, 556, 560, 564, 569, 574, 579, 581, 583, 587, 589, 593, 596, 597, 601–603
TRIB POT PP SC C. Sem. 633
TR PON PP S SC O. Sem. 330–335
TR POT PP S SC O. Sem. 318, 331
VICTORIA AVGVSTI Dup. 177–9, 181, 182, 185, 188, 230
VICTORIA AVGVSTI SC Dup. 191, 194, 196, 199, 200, 205, 206, 208, 209, 492, 495, 496, 500, 503, 506, 509, 511, 503, 504, 516, 518, 520, 522, 524, 526, 528, 530, 532, 534, 536

Concordance: BMC

Concordance: BMC—Mac Dowall

(+ — excluded from Mac Dowall—see below)

BMC Mac Dowall
1 2
2 2
3 36
4 1
5 1
6 35
7 3
8 37
9 4
10 4
11 34
12 5
13 5
14 39
15 7
16 40
17 8
18 8
19 8
20 41
21 9
22 9
23 10
24 43
25 11
26 44
27 12
28 12
29 13
30 46
31 14
32 47
33 15
34 15
35 48
36 16
37 49
38 49
39 17
40 18
41 18
42 50
43 19
44 51
45 20
46 20
47 52
48 52
49 21
50 21
51 21
52 23
53 23
54 55
55 55
56 22
57 22
58 22
59 22
60 54
61 24
62 24
63 56
64 26
65 26
66 26
67 25
68 25
69 25
70 25
71 25
72 25
73 25
74 57
75 57
76 57
77 30
78 30
79 32
80 65
81 27
82 27
83 59
84 59
85 59
86 67
87 28
88 28
89 28
90 60
91 60
92 60
93 60
94 31
95 31
96 64
97 64
98 66
99 68
100 68
101 29
102 29
103 29
104 61
105 61
106 61
107 69
108 69
109 +
110 +
111 136
112 136
113 170
114 168
115 168
116 168
117 168
118 168
119 174
120 240
121 240
122 118
123 118
124 84
125 84
126 76
127 119
128 119
129 128
130 104
131 120
132 120
133 +
134 105
135 113
136 106
137 106
138 87
139 107
140 88
141 93
142 131
143 108
144 108
145 114
146 89
147 94
148 109
149 109
150 109
151 109
152 115
153 115
154 79
155 78
156 148
157 148
158 148
159 148
160 153
161 139
162 162
163 165
164 140
165 140
166 +
167 159
168 146
169 146
170 138
171 161
172 161
173 145
174 145
175 145
176 145
177 145
178 150
179 150
180 137
181 160
182 160
183 126
184 134
185 111
186 111
187 111
188 117
189 117
190 95
191 203
192 203
193 207
194 207
195 197
196 180
197 184
198 215
199 210
200 218
201 226
202 235
203 222
204 236
205 225
206 225
207 211
208 227
209 237
210 220
211 +
212 212
213 198
214 205
215 205
216 205
217 205
218 205
219 196
220 191
221 185
222 206
223 209
224 230
225 283
226 284
227 288
228 291
229 291
230 294
231 297
232 289
233 300
234 254
235 246
236 250
237 542
238 244
239 +
240 278
241 285 & 290
242 285 Sc 290
243 285 & 290
244 285 & 290
245 287 & 293
246 296
247 296
248 296
249 299
250 301
251 276
252 269
253 271
254 275
255 539
256 272
257 260
258 262
259 307
260 305
261 325
262 325
263 325
264 325
265 326
266 334
267 317
268 327
269 312
270 310
271 323
272 323
273 322
274 308
275 320
276 320
277 320
278 320
279 329
280 315
281 331
282 331
283 318
284 330
285 335
286 337
287 358
288 360
289 360
290 362
291 356
292 340
293 339
294 353
295 353
296 356
297 343
298 342
299 342
300 342
301 352
302 346
303 405
304 444
305 406
306 402
307 423
308 439
309 439
310 433
311 408
312 418
313 418
314 474
315 462
316 448
317 448
318 434
319 419
320 426
321 441
322 436
323 420
324 421
325 421
326 477
327 442
328 451
329 422
330 414
331 466
332 443
333 452
334 452
335 493
336 507
337 507
338 494
339 508
340 517
341 523
342 525
343 521
344 531
345 531
346 531
347 533
348 533
349 533
350 503
351 509
352 518
353 524
354 524
355 524
356 526
357 526
358 526
359 206
360 571
361 571
362 571
363 576
364 598
365 584
366 572
367 572
368 544
369 567
370 591
371 595
372 +
373 copy of 554
374 573
375 592
376 543
377 547
378 574
379 574
380 579
381 593
382 593
383 593
384 593
385 593
386 593
387 596
388 596
389 587
390 336
391 +
392 619
393 631
394 631
395 632
396 609
397 615
398 618
399 614
400 617
401 608
402 620
403 624
404 633
405–427 +

Concordance: RIC—Mac Dowall

RIC Mac Dowall
1 1, 35
2–8 +
9 2, 36
10 3, 37
11–16 +
17 34
18 4, 38
19 5, 39
20 6
21 7, 40
22 8, 41
23 +
24 9, 42
25 10, 43
26 11, 44
27 12, 45
28 13, 46
29 14, 47
30 15, 48
31 16, 49
32 17
33 18, 50
34 19, 51
35 20
36 21
37–40 +
41 23, 55
42 22, 54
43 24, 56
44 26
45 25, 57
46 30, 62
47 32, 65
48 +
49 +
50 27, 50
51 67
52 28, 60
53 31, 64
54 33, 66
55 +
56 68
57 +
58 29, 61
59 +
60 69
61 118
62 415
63 415
64 96
65 102
66 84
67 91
68 444
69 430
70 70
71 76
72 +
73 416, 423
74 119, 128
75 112
76 104
77 85
77A 92
78 85
79 473
79A +
80 468
81 438
82 445
83 431
84 +
85 +
86 71
86A 71
87 77
88 105
88A 105
89 +
90 120
91 120
92 129
93 97
94 113
95 105
96 113
97 113
98 105
99 97
100 +
101 420
102 427
103 482
104 464, 470
105 450
106 450
107 450
108 450
109 417
110 424
111 98
112 106
113 439
114 432
115 98
116 106
117 87
118 82
119 +
120 +
121 122
122 107
123 88
124 93
125 447
126 433
127 131
128 418, 425
129 123
130 100
131 108
132 114
133 89, 94
134 474
135 469
136 440, 448
137 434
138 75
139 132
140 115
141 109
142 133
143 +
144 79
145 78
146 74
147 134
148 126
149 422, 429
150 101
151 +
152 111
153 117
154 90
155 95
156 466, 472
157 443, 452
158 +
159 284
160 144
161 140
162 214
163 +
164 +
165 159
166 157
167 171
168 +
169 283
170 136
171 153
172 148
173 419, 426
174 40, 277
175 +
176 573, 578
177 215, 218
178 545
179 139
180 143
181 213
182 162,165
183 599
184 481
185 592
186 +
187 441, 449
188 436
189 +
190 +
191 289
192 222
193 232, 236
194 295, 298
195 +
196 300
197 238
198 288, 291
199 +
200 224, 226
201 231, 235
202 +
203 294, 297
204 +
205 135
206 150
207 421, 428
208 145
209 216, 220
210 141
211 137
212 160, 163
213 477
214 477.483
215 465.471
216 442,451
217 +
218 151
219 138
220 161, 164
221 155
222 147, 152
223 +
224 225, 227
225 211
226 221
227 233, 237
228 239
229 +
230 +
231 +
232 +
233 168
234 240
234A +
235 +
236 +
237 +
238 169
239 +
240 +
241 630
242 626, 628
243 +
244 329
245 +
246 +
247 +
248 +
249 +
250 +
251 +
252 622
253 615, 618
254 +
255 +
256 +
257 621, 624
258 +
259 625
260 614, 617
261 +
262 608
263 620
264 +
265 +
266 +
267 335
268 330
269 +
270 331
271 318
272 633
273 +
274 203
275 +
276 493
277 504, 507
278 203, 207
279 197
280 +
281 180
282 184
283 +
284 +
285 515, 517
286 523, 525
287 519], 521
288 +
289 212
290 505, 508
291 494
292 204
293 499
294 192, 195
295 198, 201
296 510
297 190
298 188
299 185
300 177
301 516, 517
302 +
303 536
304 524, 526
305 522
306 500, 503
307 495
308 205, 208
309 194, 196
310 199
311 191
312 206, 209
313 +
314 230
315 571, 576
316 598
317 584, 588
318 285, 287, 290, 293
319 556, 560
320 564
321 574, 579
322 278
323 550
324 546
325 296, 299
326 +
327 301
328 +
329 593, 596
330 587
331 581, 583
332 550
333 175
334 +
335 256
336 255
337 252
338 572
339 +
340 +
341 +
342 591, 595
343 541
344 269
345 276
346 271
347 538
348 +
349 +
350 249
351 246, 247
352 +
353 254
354 +
355 +
356 257
357 +
358 +
359 +
360 +
361 +
362 +
363 +
364 543, 551
365 570, 575
366 +
367 +
368 275
369 +
370 539
371 +
372 542
373 272
374 243, 244
375 242
376 +
377 327
378 325
379 317
380 334
381 311
382 +
383 +
384 +
385 313
386 +
387 +
388 616
389 619
390 613
391 613
392 +
393 +
394 +
395 631
396 627, 629
397 609
398 +
399 312
400 310
401 332
402 323
403 322
404 308
405 320
406 316
407 307
408 306
409 +
410 344
411 342
412 346
413 352
414 354, 360
415 357
416 343
417 +
418 341
419 337
420 +
421 +
422 +
423 347
424 356
425 355
426 +
427 +
428 353, 359
429 +
430 +
431 348
432 +
433 +
434 336
435 345
436 +
437 +
438 +
439 +
440 +
441 +
442 +
443 +

Varieties Excluded from the Catalogue

Categories excluded

This catalogue of the western coinages of Nero excludes a number of varieties with Latin legends (sometimes included in the Roman coinages) which were in fact struck at various mints in the east, such as:

Antioch in Syria—see Wruck, Die Syrische Provinzialprägung von Augustus bis Traian

Caesarea in Cappadocia—see Sydenham, The Coinage of Caesarea in Cappadocia

Moesia—see MacDowall, "Two Roman Countermarks of a.d. 68," NC 1960, pp. 103–12

Corinth—see Earle Fox, "The Duoviri of Corinth," JIAN 1899, pp. 89–116

Other colonial mints—see Sydenham, The Coinage of Nero, pp. 137–69

The catalogue excludes varieties that can only be substantiated from forgeries—ancient or modem. Several entries in older catalogues quote coins that prove on inspection to be plated denarii or unofficial semisses that can hardly have been part of the regular production of the official mints. Unless the variety can also be substantiated from a genuine and regular coin, it has not been included.

The catalogue also excludes varieties that I have not been able to verify and vindicate from personal examination or from clear casts, photographs or rubbings. Although many new varieties have been discovered, it is surprising to find that quite a large number of the entries recorded in the RIC for Nero cannot be substantiated (varieties marked + in the concordance). In many cases it is possible to reexamine the coins from which the descriptions quoted in RIC from Sydenham, Cohen, Chedeau and de Sarcus, Gnecchi and others were originally made. Some of the unusual coins noted by Sydenham are now in the British Museum, and several interesting coins from Sydenham's own collection are in Blackburn. Many of the varieties quoted by Cohen are from the Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris; the large deposit found at Mayenne, described by M. M. Chedeau and de Sarcus is now in the Musée there. The collection of Gnecchi is now in the Museo Nazionale delle Terme in Rome.

Such reexamination of the source material can be illuminating. Sometimes a variety has been misdescribed by the first author and his misdescription has been faithfully recorded in subsequent works; in other cases a correct description of the original author has been misquoted in a later work; and sometimes a correct description has been arbitrarily given the wrong metal, denomination or mint. As this catalogue on the western coinages of Nero is in many cases based on the same material as the entries quoted by RIC, it seems appropriate to list individually all the varieties in RIC which cannot be substantiated, with a comment on any error or misdescription that can be traced.

Among the varieties excluded are those coins in BMC and RIC that belong to other mints, or are unofficial products. For convenient reference, three of these categories—plated denarii, unofficial semisses and the product of the Mint of Moesia are summarized after the list of varieties in BMC and RIC excluded. It is only by eliminating such ghosts from the catalogues, and recognizing the nature of the unofficial issues, that the regular pattern of the official coinage can be reconstructed.

Varieties in BMC excluded

BMC

109 Plated hybrid denarius—see plated denarii (9)

110 Aureus of unusual style—possibly Mint of Corinth—see entry for RIC 48 of varieties in RIC excluded from catalogue.

133 The obverse legend has been reworked at the end. As Mattingly noted, it seems to have read originally NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GER PM TRP IMP PP (not COS īī PP) and to have been Mac Dowall no. 105 166 The obverse legend has been retooled, as Mattingly noted. It seems originally to have been IMP NERO CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP XIII PP; and XIII has been reworked into IMP

BMC

211 Modem forgery—see entry for RIC 158 of varieties in RIC excluded from catalogue (Plate XXIII, x)

239 This coin in copper (Plate XXIII, w) which weighs 10.11 gm. seems to be an As. It has the obverse legend of that denomination at Rome in issue V, but the radiate head regularly used in later issues at Rome (issue IV onward) to distinguish the dupondius from the As. Its reverse type, Roma holding wreath and parazonium, is otherwise found on dupondii but not Asses. It does not fit into the pattern of the issues at Rome, and its style is somewhat suspect. It could be a trial striking, but it may well be false.

309 The obverse legend has been retooled—see entry for RIC 120 of varieties in RIC excluded from catalogue.

372 This is a hybrid which seems to be the result of a trial striking—see p. 106 above.

391 This is a barbarous coin, as Mattingly noted.

405–27 Mint of Caesarea in Cappadocia

Varieties in RIC excluded

(the descriptions are those given or implied by RIC)

RIC

2–8 11–16 Mint of Caesarea in Cappadocia

23 Denarius COH 212 (P), but the com with this legend in Paris is a plated denarius—see plated denarii (1)

37–40 Mint of Caesarea in Cappadocia

48 Aureus, Denarius BM

Obv.: IMP NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS laur. r.

Rev,: 1VPPITER LIBERATOR Jupiter seated l.

The coin in the BM is an aureus (BM 110, BMCRE I, pl. 40,15). There are two other examples—from Gnecchi's collection (RIN 1910 pl. VII, 2.) and in the Hague—both aurei struck from the same obverse and reverse dies. The style is unusual and the coin seems non-Roman. Mattingly attributes it to Greece (? Corinth).

RIC

49 Aureus, Denarius COH 124 (Vaillant, Beger)

Obv.: IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PP laur. r.

Rev.: IVPPITER LIBERATOR Jupiter seated l.

COH 124 describes an aureus only. He may possibly have misdescribed the obverse legend for RIC 48.

55 Denarius COH 319 (P) but the coin is a plated denarius— see plated denarii (8)

57 Denarius Sydenham 3 (Hall) but the coin is a plated denarius—see plated denarii (4)

59 Denarius De Quelen Coll.

Obv.: NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS PP laur. r.

Rev.: VESTA circular temple

But the fourrée denarius with this unusual obverse in the De Quelen Coll, has the reverse type legionary eagle between two standards—see plated denarii (10).

— Aureus COH 125 (Caylus)

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAES AVG laur. r.

Rev.: LEIBERTAS Head of Liberty r.

An example of this gold coin in the Hague (7.0 gm.) (Plate XXII, u) is struck from the same obverse die as an irregular silver coin in Copenhagen.

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAES AVG laur.r.

(Plate XXII, v)

Rev.: ROM ET AVG Altar of Lugdunum

The obverse portrait is clearly irregular—perhaps rather a modem than an ancient forgery (cf. SM 1965, pp. 90ff.). 72 Sest. COH 7 (no authority)

Obv.: C. PONT MAX TR POT laur. r. globe

Rev.: (21) Adlocutio without SC

This seems to have been a worn specimen of MacDowall 437 which has SC

79a Sest. Boudin-Bourgey, Paris, 1913

Obv.: C. P MAX TR P PP laur. l. aegis

Rev.: (22) Annona SC

The cast in the BM from which this description seems to be derived has head laur. l. globe and is MacDowall 479.

RIC

84 Dup. Gnecchi Coll., now in Terme Museum, Rome

(Plate XXIII, z)

Obv.: C. P. MAX TR P PP laur. r. globe

Rev.: (22) Annona SC

This coin has an unconvincing crack, which does not seem to have been caused by ancient striking. The obverse legend and globe are only found on issues of Lugdunum, the portraiture, bust truncation and treatment of the globe are not characteristic of the developed style of the Lugdunum issues L-V and L-VI, to which the coin should belong. It is almost certainly a modem forgery.

85 Sest. Gnecchi Coll. (RIN 1905, p. 161 pl. VII, 1.)—now in Terme Museum, Rome.

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER laur. r. aegis

Rev.: (22) Annona without SC The reverse of this coin in the Terme has been tooled; there are disturbances in the exergue which make it difficult to be sure that it genuinely omits SC. The coin probably had the letters originally and so would be MacDowall 119.

89 Multiple Sest. Walters Coll. (NC 1915, p. 329f.)

Obv.: A. CLAVDIVS … GER laur. r.

Rev.: (30) Ostia—seven ships AVGVSTI POR OST (101.29 gm.)

The weight of this piece suggests it may have been equal to 4 sestertii. Its genuineness has been questioned, but whether genuine or not, it can hardly have been intended as part of the normal coinage.

100 Sest. Sydenham 15.

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER laur. r. globe and aegis

Rev.: (30) Ostia—eight ships PORT AVG, SC

The coin described in Sydenham has aegis only—i.e. is MacDowall 120.

119 Sest. COH 71 (Autrefois M. Gonzalès)

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GERM laur. l.

Rev.: (23) Congiarium l. CONG POP R, SC

RIC

The legend described by Cohen seems to be incomplete, with the number of the Congiarium and DAT missing. It may possibly be a misdescription of MacDowall 82.

120 Sest. COH 77 (BM)

Obv.: C. PONT MAX TRPOT PP laur. r. globe

Rev.: (23) Congiarium l. CONG] DAT POPVLO īī, SC BM 309 has this legend, but the reverse is worn and seems to have been tooled. The legend was probably originally the CONG T DAT POP normally found at Lugdunum, i.e. MacDowall 439.

143 Sest. COH 95 (P)

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GERM laur. l.

Rev.: (27) Decursio Vex without SC

The coin in Paris has the obverse legend A. CLAVDIVS … GERM laur. l., and the entry in Cohen seems to refer to this, as it has "même légende" as COH 94 which has CLAVDIVS or CLAVD, i.e. is MacDowall 78.

151 Sest. Fairbairn Coll.

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GERM laur. l.

Rev.: (35) Arch SC

This is a variety one might well expect in issue III at Rome.

158 C. As Sydenham 12 (Carfrae)

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMANIC laur. r.

Rev.: (35) Arch SC

Three examples of this coin aee known: J. Hirsch 33, no. 1157; Glasgow and BM 211 (Plate XXIII, x). All three are struck from the same obverse and reverse dies, and from the same obverse die as the struck forgery in Oxford of a silver coin with a copper core (Plate XXIII, y). Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMANIC laur. r.

Rev.: Veiled head of Pietas r.

They are all modem forgeries. But the BM coin has been struck over a genuine dupondius of VICTORIA AVGVSTI

RIC

type with the mark of value. There are traeus of VI, TI and īī on the flan.

163 Sest. COH 136 (P)

Obv.: IMP NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM laur. r.

Rev.: (29) Janus TERRA door l. SC

Cohen's entry seems a partial description of a rather worn sestertius in Paris which continued PM TRP XIII PP, i.e. is MacDowall 171.

164 Sest. Sydenham 12 (BM)

Obv.: B. CLAVD … GERM laur. r. aegis

Rev.: (29) Janus TERRA door l. SC

The coin seems to be BM 166, which is heavily tooled toward the end of the legend and probably had TRP XIII PP originally, i.e. is MacDowall 171.

168 Sest. Naples.

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAES AVG IMP TR POT XI PP bust draped cuirassed r.

Rev.: (29) Janus TERRA door l. SC

The coin in Naples with this obverse has the reverse type of Janus TERRA door r. SC. Its obverse legend has been tooled from NERO CAESAR AVG IMP TR POT XI PPP, i.e. is MacDowall 136.

175 C. As COH 147

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER laur. r. globe

Rev.: (28) Janus TERRA door r. SC

Cohen's entry is merely "la mème médaille" "M.B.," and the preceding entry COH 146 has these types and legends "quelquefois dessous un globe." The coin described by Cohen under 147 therefore probably had no globe, and was the variety described in RIC 174, i.e. MacDowall 280.

186 Sest. COH 155 (Rollin)

Obv.: C. P MAX TRIB P PP laur. r.

Rev.: (28) Janus TERRA door r. SC

From the obverse legend, this should be a Lugdunum sestertius, and have a globe. But as the globe is missing from the description, one wonders whether the legend

RIC

itself is not misdescribed for C. P. MAX TR P PP laur. r. globe, i.e. is MacDowall 475.

189 Sest. Sydenham 41 (BM)

Obv.: B. CLAVD … GERM … TRP XII

Rev.: (28) Janus TERRA door r. SC

This seems to be BM 113, which in fact reads TRP XIII, i.e. is MacDowall 170.

190 C. As COH 163 (P)

Obv.: NERO CAESAR GER IMP laur. r.

Rev.: (42) Janus VBIQ door l. SC

Cohen also adds that SC is in exergue. The coin in Paris with this reverse type with SC in exergue, and the other examples I have noted in Cambridge, Munich, Vienna and Ostia have NERO CAESAR AVG GERM IMP laur. r.; this coin is MacDowall 289.

195 C. As COH 167 (Chedeau and de Sarcus)

Obv.: IMP NERO CAESAR AVG GERM laur. r. globe

Rev.: (42) Janus VBIQ door l. SC

This is the description in the publication of the find from Mayenne no. 114; but I found no such coin in the Mayenne museum. Most copper Asses in this find are of the Lugdu- num mint and have the Lugdunum globe. It seems that the authors have mistakenly added the globe to their description of the common As of the Mint of Rome, MacDowall 295.

199 C. As COH 173 (no authority)

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER bare l.

Rev.: (41) Janus VBIQ door r. SC

Cohen gives this obverse with a number of coins of the Janus VBIQ door r. type. He seems to have misdescribed an As of the Janus TERRA door r. type, with an obverse globe, MacDowall 578.

202 Dup. (no authority)

Obv.: B. CLAVD … GER laur. r.

Rev.: (41) Janus VBIQ door r. SC

Seems to be a misdescription (laureate for radiate) from a worn example of MacDowall 231.

RIC

204 C. As COH 176 (BM)

Obv.: IMP NERO CAESAR AVG GERMANIC laur.r.

Rev.: (41) Janus VBIQ door r. SC

No coin in the BM answers this description; but BM 233 has the same legend with Janus VBIQ door l. and Cohen's entry seems a misdescription for MacDowall 300.

217 Sest. COH 269

Obv.: C. PONTIF MAX TRIB POT PP laur. r. globe

Rev.: (31) ROMA viet. and paraz. SC

This is a variety one might well expect in Issue L-V.

223 Dup. Sydenham 34 (Sydenham Coll.) now in BM

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER rad. r.

Rev.: ROMA, SC. Roma seated l. holding wreath, her l. arm rests on shield placed on helmet.

The left side of the reverse field of the BM coin (Sydenham pi. II, fig. 28) has been reworked, and the present S, R (of ROMA) and the wreath have been tooled in. The wreath seems to have been inserted mistakenly for the victory which is found on the rare sestertii of this type, described in MacDowall 147 and 152. This dupondius is described by me as having the victory of MacDowall 217.

229 Sest. Sydenham 48 (Gnecchi Coll.)

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER laur. r. globe

Rev.: Roma seated 1. holding spear, rests l. arm on shield ROMA, SC

The coin now in the Terme, formerly in the Gnecchi Collection, on which this entry seems to be based, has Nero's head laureate r. without a globe, and Roma holds not a spear but a victory. It is MacDowall 147.

230 Sest. Sydenham 49 (Brunet à Evreux)

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER laur. l.

Rev.: as 229 above.

In Paris there is a sestertius with this obverse legend and reverse type, with a globe on the obverse. A normal sestertius obverse of the Lugdunum mint has been inserted to replace the worn obverse of a coin of the type of

RIC

MacDowall 158, and the fabrication is betrayed by the circular incision all around the outside of the obverse legend.

231 Dup. Sydenham 50 (Brunet à Evreux)

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER rad. l.

Rev.: as 229 above.

I have not been able to substantiate this variety. If it genuinely exists it would be a hybrid with a reverse of issue VI and an obverse of issue IV, but the description may be incomplete and derived from a worn coin.

232 Sest. COH 285 (P)

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER laur. r.

Rev.: (33) Roma shield l. SC

But COH 285 and the coin in Paris which it describes has the obverse legend B. CLAVD … GERM … TRP XIII, i.e. is MacDowall 168.

234A Dup. Sydenham 46 (Belfort)

Obv.: B. CLAVD … GERM … TRP XIII laur. r.

Rev.: (33) Roma shield l. SC

This coin is not described in the 1888 sale catalogue. It is probably a misdescription of a dupondius with a radiate head (MacDowall 240) or of a sestertius with a laureate head (MacDowall 168).

235 Sest. BM

Obv.: B. CLAVD … GERM laur. r. or l.

Rev.: (34) Roma shield r. SC

The only BM coin with this reverse BM 119 (BMCRE I Pl. 41,4) has obverse legend B. CLAVD … GERM … TRP XIII laur. l., i.e. is MacDowall 174. The variety with TRP XIII laur. r. is MacDowall 169.

236 Dup. Messenger Coll.

Obv.: B. CLAVD … GERM laur. r.

Rev.: (34) Roma shield r. SC

The Messenger coin with this reverse is illustrated in BMCRE I pl. 48,5 and has the obverse legend B. CLAVD … GERM … TRP XIII rad. r. and is MacDowall 241.

RIC

237 Sest. Berlin

Obv.: B. CLAVD … GERM laur. r. aegis

Rev.: (34) Roma shield r. SC

The Berlin coin with this reverse (cast in BM) has obverse legend B. CLAVD … GERM … TRP XIII and is MacDowall 169.

239 C. Sem. COH 272 (P). The coin is an unofficial copy—see SM 1965, pp. 90ff.

240 C. Sem. Sydenham 52 (L)

Obv.: NERO CAESAR AVG PONTIF barer.

Rev.: (48) Roma MAX TRIB POT PP SC in exergue This seems to be a misdescription from a worn coin for the obverse legend IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONTIF bare r. globe and is MacDowall 626.

243 C. Sem. Sydenham 55 (Belfort)

Obv.: IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONTIF barer.

Rev.: (48) Roma MAX TRIB POT IMP PP, SC

This may be a misdescription for the reverse legend MAX TRIB POT PP, SC of MacDowall 626.

245 Or. Sem. COH 189 (P)

Obv.: NERO CAES AVG IMP laur. r.

Rev.: (48) Roma PON MAX TRP IMP PP, SC COH 189 and the coin in Paris which the entry describes have PON MA TRP IMP PP, SC, i.e. MacDowall 328.

246 Or. Sem. Sydenham 59

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER laur. r.

Rev.: (48) Roma PON MAX TRP IMP PP, SC wreath and parazonium

Sydenham 59 has reverse legend PON MA TRP IMP PP, SC and this is the variety noted in MacDowall 315.

247 Or. Sem. Sydenham 60 (Belfort)

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER laur. r.

Rev.: (48) Roma PON MAX TRP IMP PP, SC para- zonium

Sydenham 60 is a Roma seated r. (not l.). It may possibly be one of the unofficial copies of semisses.

RIC

248 C. Sem. COH 190 (Chedeau and de Sarcus)

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM bare r. globe

Rev.: (48) Roma PON MAX TRP PP, SC

This is the description in the publication of the find from Mayenne no. 122, but I have not been able to confirm the reading.

249 C. Sem. Sydenham 62 (RIN 1913)

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMANIC laur. r.

Rev.: Roma PON MAX TRP IMP PP, SC (victory and paraz.)

The coin in RIN 1913 has these legends but no SC on the reverse; and Roma holds a wreath. It is MacDowall 304.

250 C. Sem. Sydenham 63 (Walters)

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMANIC laur. r.

Rev.: (48) Roma PON MAX TRP IMP PP, SC (wreath) Sydenham 63 describes the reverse as without SC and this Walters coin is in fact described in MacDowall 304.

251 C. Sem. BM

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM bare r.

Rev.: (48) Roma PON MAX TRP IMP PP, SC

The only BM coin with these legends is BM 260 (BMCRE I, pi. 45,4) which has a laureate head on the obverse, and no SC on the reverse. It is in fact described in MacDowall 305.

254 C. Sem. BM

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM bare l.

Rev.: (48) Roma PONTIF MAX TRP IMP PP, SC

The only BM coin with this reverse legend and its head bare 1. is BM 398 (BMCRE I, pl. 47,11) and this has the obverse legend NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM, i.e. is MacDowall 618.

255 C. Sem. Sydenham 68 (Belfort)

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM laur. r.

Rev.: (48) Roma PONTIF MAX TRP IMP PP, SC (wreath and branch)

RIC

Sydenham 68 has NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM, and seems to be a misdescription for the variety with head bare r. and l. globe in MacDowall 615 and 618.

256 C. Sem. Sydenham 69 (no authority)

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMA bare r. globe

Rev.: (48) Roma PONTIF MAX TRP IMP PP, SC in exergue

Sydenham 69 has NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMA and is in fact MacDowall 612.

258 C. Sem. Sydenham 72 (no authority)

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM bare l. globe

Rev.: (48) Roma PONTIF MAX TRPOT PP, SC

This seems to be a misdescription of the PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP, SC of MacDowall 617.

261 C. Sem. Sydenham 77 (Sydenham Coll.)

Obv.: NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMAN laur. l. globe

Rev.: (48) Roma PONTIF MAX TRPOT IMP PP, SC The coin from Sydenham's collection with these obverse and reverse legends is now in Blackburn. It has a bare head, and is MacDowall 610.

264 C. Sem. COH 238 (Chedeau and de Sarcus)

Obv,: IMP NERO CAESAR AVG P MAX bare r.

Rev.: (48) Roma PONTIF MAX TRPOT IMP PP, SC

This is the description in the publication of the find from Mayenne no. 123, but I have not been able to confirm the reading.

265 C. Sem. Sydenham 84 (Lawrence Coll.)

Obv.: IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONT bare r. globe

Rev.: (48) Roma PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP PP, SC

I have not been able to verify this variety, which COH 239 also cites from M. Grosdemange.

266 C. Sem. COH 240 (Corbet)

Obv.: IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONTIF bare r. globe

Rev.: (48) Roma PONTIF MAX TRPOT IMP PP, SC RIC

I have not been able to verify this variety.

269 Or. Sem. COH 331 (P)

Obv.: NERO CAESAR AVG IMP barer.

Rev.: (48) Roma TR PON PP, SC, S

Both the coins in Paris with this reverse legend have the obverse NERO CAES AVG IMP laur. r. which is described in MacDowall 330.

273 C. As COH 353 (Rollin)

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TR P IMP PP bare r.

Rev.: (48) No legend, Roma seated l.

Is this laur. r.? and so the copper semis without SC of Issue described in MacDowall 303.

275 Or. Dup. COH 126 (P)

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER rad. r. aegis

Rev.: (36) Macellum MAC AVG, SC

One of the dupondii in Paris with these types and legends has traces of an aegis; but there is a disturbance in the field near the PP and N and there seems to have been some tooling of the obverse. Perhaps the aegis is due to this, and the coin is really MacDowall 203.

280 Dup. COH 358 (no authority)

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER laur. r.

Rev.: (36) No legend. Macellum

COH 358 has this variety with head rad. r., i.e. MacDowall 186.

283 Dup. Belfort

Obv.: A. CLAVDIVS … GERM laur. r.

Rev.: (36) No legend, Macellum

I have not confirmed this variety, but it is quite a possible one for issue II at Rome.

284 Dup. COH 322 (Gréau)

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER rad. r.

Rev.: (37) Securitas SC with no mark of value.

The mark of value has perhaps been omitted in the description and so the coin is MacDowall 204.

288 Dup. COH 320 wrongly for COH 330 (Chedeau and de Sarcus)

Obv.: C. PONT MAX TR POT PP laur. r.

Rev.: (37) Securitas SC

This is the description in the publication of the find from Mayenne no. 155, but I have not been able to confirm the reading.

302 Dup. COH 337 (no authority)

Obv.: NERO CAESAR AVG PMAX TRP PP laur. l.

Rev.: (39) Victoria l. wk. SC

This seems to be a misdescription from a worn coin of the legend C. P MAX TRP PP laur. l. globe of MacDowall 526.

313 Dup. COH 350 (P)

Obv.: B. CLAVDIVS … GER rad. r.

Rev.: (40) Victoria r. īī, SC

COH 350 and the coin in Paris which it describes has the obverse legend A. CLAVDIVS … GER i.e. with IMP as cognomen and not as praenomen and is MacDowall 200.

326 C. As COH 300 (no authority)

Obv.: IMP NERO CAESAR AVG GERMANIC bare r. globe

Rev.: (47) Victory SC

COH 300 has merely head bare r. (no mention of a globe) and is probably a mistaken description for the variety with head laur. r.; MacDowall 301.

328 C. As COH 301 (no authority)

Obv.: IMP NERO CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS laur. r.

Rev.: (47) Victory SC

This also seems a misdescription of MacDowall 301.

334 ? C. As Sydenham 45 (Gréau)

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER laur. r.

Rev.: ROMA, SC Victory l. with shield inscribed SPQR This coin seems to be an unofficial copy, combining in one type features of two reverse types as some of the unofficial semisses (see below).

339 C. As COH ιοί (no authority)

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER laur. r.

Rev.: (46) Genius with SC, but no mark of value COH 101 seems to be a description from which ī has been omitted, i.e. the variety is orichalcum As. MacDowall 269.

340 C. As COH 101 (no authority)

Obv.: A. CLAVDIVS … GER barer.

Rev.: (46) Genius with SC, but no mark of value COH 101 has head laur. r. and seems to omit ī i.e. the variety is orichalcum As. MacDowall 266.

341 C. As Sydenham 5 (RIN 1913)

Obv.: A. CLAVDIVS … GERM barel.

Rev.: (46) Genius with SC, but no mark of value The coin in RIN 1913 has no SC and is MacDowall 251.

348 Or. As COH 106 (P)

Obv.: D. CLAVD … GERMANIC laur. r.

Rev.: (46) Genius with SC and ī

COH 106 and the coin in Paris which it describes have the head laur. l., i.e. is MacDowall 540.

349 C. As COH 196 (P)

Obv.: D. CLAVDIVS … GERMA laur. l.

Rev.: (44) Apollo TRP without SC

The coin in Paris which Cohen describes seems to have a bare (not laureate) head, as does the coin with these legends in the BM—BM 236 (BMCRE I pl. 44,8). The variety is therefore MacDowall 250.

352 Or. As COH 199 (no authority)

Obv.: D. CLAVD … GERMANI rad. r.

Rev.: (44) Apollo TRP without SC

This may be a worn or badly described example of the variety with the legends SC and ī, i.e. MacDowall 275.

354 Or. As COH 241 (P)

Obv.: D. CLAVD … GERMANIC rad. r.

Rev.: (44) Apollo TRP without SC

But COH 241 and the coin in Paris it describes have PONTIF MAX TR POT (not TRP) IMP PP, i.e. is MacDowall 260.

355 Or. As (no authority)

Obv.: D. CLAVDIVS … GERMANIC rad. r.

Rev.: (44) Apollo TRPOT without SC

This may be a misdescription for the variety with SC and ī of MacDowall 272.

357 C. As COH 243 (Chedeau and de Sarcus)

Obv.: A. CLAVD … GER bare r. globe

Rev.: (44) Apollo TRPOT without SC

COH 243 and Mayenne no. 128, which it reports, have SC, and the variety is MacDowall 570.

358 Or. As COH 200 (no authority)

Obv.: D. CLAVD … GERMANIC rad. r.

Rev.: (44) Apollo TRP SC

If this coin had ī, it would be MacDowall 274.

359 Or. As COH 200 (no authority)

Obv.: D. CLAVDIVS … GERMANIC rad. r.

Rev.: (44) Apollo TRP SC

This seems to be an incomplete description. Orichalcum asses either have both SC and ī or no SC and no mark of value.

360 Or. As COH 201 (no authority)

Obv.: D. CLAVDIVS … GERMANICVS rad. r.

Rev.: (44) Apollo TRP SC

If this coin lacked SC and had POT, it would be MacDowall 259.

Or. As COH 202 (Gréau)

Obv.: D. CLAVDIVS … GERMANICVS laur. r.

Rev.: (44) Apollo TRP SC

If this coin lacked SC and had POT, it would be MacDowall 257.

361 C. As COH 247 (P)

Obv.: D. CLAVD … GERMAN bare r. globe

Rev.: (44) Apollo TR POT SC

RIC

COH 247 has "mème légende" i.e. NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS "quelquefois avec GERMAN," and the coin in Paris has GERMANICVS, i.e. is MacDowall 543.

362 Or. As Sydenham 14 (St. Albans)

Obv.: D. CLAVD … GERMAN laur. r. globe

Rev.: (44) Apollo TR POT SC

The coin in the Herts. County Museum, St. Albans on which this description is based has GERMANI (not GERMAN) and has the reverse mark of value ī, i.e. is MacDowall 537.

363 C. As Sydenham 15 (no authority)

Obv.: D. CLAVD … GERMANI laur. l.

Rev.: (44) Apollo TR POT SC

This seems to be a misdescription of the orichalcum As with GERMANIC (not GERMANI) and the reverse mark of value ī, i.e. MacDowall 539.

366 Or. As Sydenham 21 (Gnecchi Coll., RIN 1910, p. 450 no. 4.)

Obv.: A. CLAVDIVS … GERMANIC laur. r.

Rev.: (44) Apollo TR POTEST SC

But the coin from the Gnecchi Collection, now in the Terme, has the reverse mark of value ī and is MacDowall 262.

367 Or. As COH 191 (P)

Obv.: D. CLAVDIVS … GERMANIC rad. r.

Rev.: (44) Apollo PONTIF M TRPOT IMP PP, SC

There is no coin with these legends in Paris, but there are two examples with this obverse legend rad. r. and the reverse PONTIF MAX TRPOT IMP PP. SC, i.e. MacDowall 272.

369 Or. As COH 249 (P)

Obv.: D. CLAVD … GERMAN bare l.

Rev.: (44) Apollo TR POT SC

But COH 249 has GERMANICVS ("quelquefois GERMAN") and the coin in Paris which Cohen quotes has GERMANICVS bare l. globe and is a copper As, i.e. MacDowall 542.

371 Or. As Sydenham 26 (COH 249, P)

Obv.: D. CLAVD … GERMANICVS bare l.

Rev.: (44) Apollo TR POT SC

The coin in Paris is a copper As, MacDowall 542.

376 C. Sem. COH 46 (P) is an unofficial copy—see SM 1965, pp. 90ff.

382 Or. Sem. COH 49 (P)

Obv.: NERO CLAV CAESAR AVG IMP TR POT PP laur. r.

Rev.: (49) Table CER QVINQ ROM CO SC

There is no such coin in Paris, but the Paris semis on which the description in Cohen seems to be based, with the reverse lacking S as he describes it, has NERO CAESAR AVG IMP TR POT PP laur. r. and is MacDowall 311.

383 C. Sem. COH 50 (Dancoisne)

Obv.: NERO CLAV CAESAR AVG GERM bare l.

Rev.: (49) Table CER QVINQ ROM CO SC

I have not been able to verify this variety.

384 C. Sem. BM

Obv.: IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONT bare r. globe

Rev.: (44) Table CER QVINQ ROM CO SC

There is no such example in the BM; the entry seems to misdescribe BM 393 (BMCRE I pl. 47,9) which has CER QVINQ ROMAE CON and is MacDowall 631.

386 Or. Sem. COH 52 (P)

Obv.: NERO CLAV CAESAR AVG bare r.

Rev.: (49) Table CER QVINQ ROM CON SC

The coin in Paris which Cohen seems to be describing has a laureate head and is MacDowall 604.

387 C. Sem. Webb Coll. This coin is an unofficial copy.

392 C. Sem. Sydenham 18 (Oxford University)

Obv.: NERO CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS bare r. globe

Rev.: (49) Table CER QVINQ ROM CON SC

Sydenham 18 and the Oxford coin it describes have NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERMANICVS, i.e. is MacDowall 607.

393 C. Sem. Sydenham 19 (BM)

Obv.: IMP NERO CAESAR AVG PONT barer.

Rev.: (49) Table CER QVINQ ROM CON SC

There is no such example in the BM. The entry seems derived from BM 394 which has ROMAE CON, i.e. is MacDowall 631.

394 C. Sem. (BM) Unofficial copy with retrograde reverse legend.

398 Or. Sem. Sydenham 24 (Belfort)

Obv.: NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM IMP bare r.

Rev.: (49) Table CERT QVINQ ROM CO SC, S

The coin seems to be a misdescription for the semis with the obverse legend NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERMA laur r., MacDowall 312.

409 C. Sem. COH 65 (P)

Obv.: A. CLAVDIVS … GERM laur. r.

Rev.: (49) Table CERTAMEN QVINQ ROM CON without SC

The copper semis without SC in Paris from which the entry in Cohen is derived has CERTAMEN QVINQ ROM CO. Cohen's entry is a misdescription for MacDowall 306.

417 Or. Q. COH in (Elberling)

Obv.: Column NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG

Rev.: (50) Branch GER PM TRP PP, SC

This seems a misdescription for the reverse legend GER PM TRP IMP PP, SC; MacDowall 341.

420 C. Q. COH 112 (Elberling)

Obv.: Column NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG

Rev.: (50) Branch GER PONT MAX TRP IMP PP, SC

I have not been able to substantiate this variety.

421 C. Q. COH 113 (P)

Obv.: Column NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG

Rev.: (50) Olive Branch GERM PM TRP IMP PP SC There is no copper quadrans in Paris with these legends, but Cohen's description seems to come from an orichalcum quadrans with this obverse legend and the reverse GER

RIC

RM TRP for GER PM TRP—perhaps due to die engraver's error or a die flaw, i.e. MacDowall 341.

422 Or. Q. BM

Obv.: Column NERO CLA CAE AVG GERM

Rev.: (50) Branch PM TRP IMP PP, SC

The quadrane with these types and legends in the BM is in copper without SC—BM 293, i.e. MacDowall 339.

426 Or. Q. (no authority)

Obv.: Column NERO CLAV CAES AVG GER

Rev.: (50) Branch PM TRP IMP PP, SC

The RIC entry comments "obverse legend doubtful." It seems to be a misdescription for NERO CLAV CAE AVG GER or NERO CLA CAES AVG GER, i.e. MacDowall 350 or 355.

427 Or. Q. (no authority)

Obv.: Column NERO CLAV CAESAR AVG GER

Rev.: (50) Branch PM TRP IMP PP, SC

This seems a misdescription from a coin worn or with legend off flan.

429 Or. Q. BM

Obv.: Column NERO CLAVD CAE AVG GER

Rev.: (50) Branch PM TRP IMP PP, SC

The coin in the BM with these legends is BM 287 (BMCRE I, pl. 45,12) a quadrane in copper, MacDowall 358.

430 Or. Q. and C. Q. Sydenham 16 (L)

Obv.: Column NERO CLAVD CAES AVG GER

Rev.: (50) Branch PM TRP IMP PP, SC

I have not been able to substantiate this variety.

432 Or. Q. COH 186 (P)

Obv.: Column NERO CLAVDIVS CAES AVG GERM

Rev.: (50) Branch PM TRP IMP PP, SC

This seems to be based on a worn quadrans in Paris on which the legends are not clear.

433 Or. Q. COH 187 (P)

Obv.: Column NERO CLAVDIVS CAES AVG GERM

Rev.: (50) Branch PON M TRP IMP PP (no SC)

The coin in Paris on which Cohen's entry seems based is a copper quadrans without SC, with the obverse legend NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM, i.e. MacDowall 336.

436 C. Q. COH 188 (Gréau)

Obv.: Column NERO CLAVDIVS CAES AVG GERM

Rev.: (50) Branch PON MA TRP IMP, SC

This coin does not occur in the Gréau sale catalogue as Cohen stated.

437 Or. Q., C. Q. COH 183 (P) and 184 (Rollin)

Obv.: Owl NERO CLAV CAE AVG GERM

Rev.: Column PM TRP IMP PP, SC

The coin in Paris, and COH 183 which accurately describes it, have NERO CLAV CAE AVG GER and the coin is a copper quadrans, MacDowall 361. COH 184 has the same legend and is merely a die variant with the aegis to the left on the reverse.

438 C. Sem. COH 256 (P) Unofficial copy—see SM 1965, pp. 90ff.

439–441 C. As Mint of Moesia—see NC 1960, pp. 103 ff.

442 Denarius BM.

Obv.: NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS laur. r.

Rev.: COS ITER TRPOT Pax seated l.

This denarius in the BM with a reverse type of Vespasian is fourrée—see plated denarii (9).

443 C. As COH 359 (P)

Obv.: C. PMAX TRP PP laur. l. globe

Rev.: No legend, sailing vessel with rowers.

The reverse of the coin in Paris on which Cohen's entry seems based, is very battered with hardly any trace of a reverse type. It is certainly no good evidence for the completely new reverse type suggested by Cohen.

Plated Denarii

The following varieties of denarii, which are hybrid coins that combine an obverse type of one issue with the reverse type of another, are not represented in hoards and prove on close inspection to be plated. Being known only from fourrée examples they must therefore be distinguished from the regular coinage (see Chapter 3 above).

No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC COH
Head bare r.
(1) NERO CAESAR AVG IMP Wreath TRP VI BM, P 23 212
(2) Head laur. r. PONTIF MAXIM Livia std. r. Ox
(3) NERO CAESAR Iupiter Custos BM
(4) Vesta BM 57
(5) Eagle and standards P
(6) NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS Augustus Germanicus BM, M
(7) Eagle and standards BM, M
(8) Salus fd. BM, Ox 55 319
(9) COS ITER TR POT BM 442
(10) NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS PP Eagle and standards De Q 59
(11) IMP NERO CAESAR AVGVSTVS AugustusAugusta Si
(12) Vesta C
(13) Eagle and standards C

Unofficial Copper Semisses

The following varieties of copper semisses are known only from irregular coins, that can hardly have been official products of a regular mint (see my article "Nero's Altar of Lugdunum Type," SM 59 (1965), pp. 90–93).

No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC COH
(1) NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GRM Head bare r. ROMA [SC] Roma seated l. holding victory (Plate XXI, h) P 239 272
(2) NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG Head bare r. CER QVINC RO Table P 376 46
(3) NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GER Head bare l., globe CER QVINQ ROM CON SC Table Webb 387
(4) NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GRM Head bare r. CER QVINQ ROM CON, SC Roma seated l. (Plate XXI, g) BM
(5) NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM Head bare r. or l. CER QVINQ ROMAE CON Table (retrograde) BM 394
(6) NERO CLAVD CAESAR AVG GERM Head bare l., globe Altar of Lugdunum ROM ET AVG (Plate XXI, e) Nij. P. 438 256

Mint of Moesia

The following copper asses with Latin legends should be distinguished from the western coinages of Nero. In "Two Roman Countermarks of a.d. 68," NC 1960, pp. 103–12, I attribute them to a mint in Moesia.

No. Obverse Reverse Coll. RIC COH
(1) NERO CLAVDIVS CAESAR AVG GERM PM TRP Head laur. r. SC. Neptune stg. (Plate XXI, i, j) Ox. Wal. 441
(2) Head laur. l. PROVIDENT, SC. Square altar (Plate XXI, k, l) ANS, Got,Trau, Goubastoff 440 255
(3) Head laur. r. SC. Eagle on globe (Plate XXII, m) Got, Sof, W, C, Her 439

Several coins from this mint are countermarked ΓΑΑΒΑ as the sestertius (Plate XXI, d) and the Asses (Plate XXI, i, k).


BACK

APPENDIX

I. Analyses of Some Silver Coins

Mint of Rome, Denarii image CU
1. Nero TRP VII (a.d. 60/61) Mac Dowall 43 96.3 1.7 2.0
2. Nero TRP VIII (a.d. 61/62) Mac Dowall 48 99.0 0.1
3. Nero post-reform issue I (a.d. 64/66) Mac Dowall 60 93 7
4. Nero post-reform issue 3 a (a.d. 68) Mac Dowall 68 89 11
Mint of Antioch, Tetradrachms
5. Nero early pre-reform (c. a.d. 60) Wrack 38 90 10
6. Nero BIP (a.d. 63/64) Wrack 47 76 24
7. Vespasian Wrack 75 a 90 10
8. Vespasian Wrack 88 90 10
Mint of Caesarea, Drachms and Hemidrachms
9. Tiberius Syd. 42 72 28
10. Nero (Greek Legend) pre-reform Syd. 83 67 33
11. Nero (Latin legend) pre-reform Syd. 77 85 15
12. Nero (Latin legend) pre-reform Syd. 81 69 31
13. Nero yr. 11. (a.d. 64/65) Syd. 88 67 33
14. Vespasian Syd. 94 60 40

Coins 1–4 and 9–14 were analyzed by the Neutron Activation method, and coins 5–8 were analyzed on the X-Ray spectrometer. These analyses were carried out at the Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford, and I am indebted to Dr. Hall, Mr. Ainsley and Miss Emeleus for providing these results.

We may compare the earlier analyses of Nero's post-reform denarii quoted by A. V. Rauch 1 as 94.3 percent silver, and by Akerman 2 as 92.1 percent silver. Bolin 3 is rightly cautious about the results obtained by V. Ondrouch 4 from specific gravities of 86.7 percent and 91.6 percent silver.

End Notes

1
MittNumGes Berlin 1857, P. 297.
2
J. Y. Akerman , A Descriptive Catalogue of Rare and Unedited Roman Coins, 1 (London, 1834), p. xiii.

II. Metrological Tables

  • Mint of Rome: Aurei
  • Mint of Rome: Denarii
  • Mint of Antioch: Tetradrachms
  • Mint of Caesarea: Drachms
  • Mint of Rome: Sestertii and Dupondii
  • Mint of Rome: Copper Asses
  • Mint of Rome: Orichalcum Asses
  • Mint of Rome: Orichalcum Quadrantes
  • Mint of Lugdunum: Sestertii and Dupondii
image

1. MINT OF ROME: AUREI (Based on Aurei published in BMCRE I)

image

2. MINT OF ROME: DENARII (Based on denarii published in BMCRE I)

image

3. MINT OF ANTIOCH: TETRADRACHMS (Based on the weights of coins in the British Museum, Glascow, Oxford and Milan coll., and the Eleutheropolis hoard)

image

4. MINT OF CAESAREA: DRACHMS (Based on the weights of coins in the British Museum, Glascow, Oxford, Milan and Sydenham coll.)

image

5. MINT OF ROME: SESTERTII AND DUPONDII (Based on the weights of coins in BMCRE I [Claudius]; Chapter 4 above [Nero Issue II]; British Museum, Oxford and Glascow coll. [Issues III-IV]; all examples noted by MacDowall [Issues V-VI])

image

6. MINT OF ROME: COPPER ASSES (Based on the weights of coins in Chapter 4 above [Issue I]; the British Museum, Oxford, Cambridge, Glascow, Milan, Vatican and Vienna coll. [Issues IV–VI])

image

7. MINT OF ROME: ORICHALCUM ASSES (Based on the weights of coins quoted in Chapter 4 above [Issue II]; other orichalcum asses noted by MacDowall [Issue III])

image

8. MINT OF ROME: ORICHALCUM QUADRANTES (Based on the weights of coins quoted in Chapter 4 above [Issue II]; in the British Museum, Oxford, Cambridge, Milan, Madrid, Real Academia, Vatican and Vienna coll. [Issue III])

image

9. MINT OF LUGDUNUM: SESTERTII AND DUPONDII (Based on the weights of coins quoted in Chapter 6 above [Issue III]; in the British Museum, Oxford, Cambridge, Milan, Vatican, Vienna, Paris, Blackburn, Manchester, the Hague , Hermitage and ANS [Issues IV-VI], Dupondii of Issues V–VI are of the Securitas type only)

End Notes

3
S. Bolin, State and Currency, p. 197, n. 2.
4
V. Ondrouch, Der römische Denarfund von Vyškovce, 2 (Bratislava, 1934), p. 11.

Appendix III

III. Examples of Die Linkage at Rome in Sestertius Issue III

Obv. legend: NERO CLAVD(IVS) CAESAR AVG GER(M) PM TRP IMP PP

Variations as noted:

  • CLAVDIVS … GERM laur. r. aegis
  • CLAVDIVS … GERM laur. l.
  • CLAVD … GERM laur. r. aegis
  • CLAVD … GERM laur. l.
  • CLAVDIVS … GER laur. r. aegis
  • CLAVDIVS … GER laur. l.
  • CLAVD … GER laur. r. aegis
  • CLAVD … GER laur. l.
A 1 (c) P 1 Adlocutio Milan 1007 (rev. reworked)
P 2 Ostia Santamaria F.P.L. 15 (1934), 317
P 3 Congiarium r. Rome, Terme
P 4 Congiarium l. Bahrfeldt, 500
P 5 Congiarium l. Paris
ANS
Stockholm (rev. tooled)
Basel Münzhandlung, 191
A 2 (a) P 5 Congiarium l. Prince W. I, 185
P 6. Ostia Oxford photo
A 3 (e) P 6 Ostia Oxford
P 7 Arch Oxford
A 4 (e) P 6 Ostia Glasgow
Stockholm
Ryan, 2285
P 8 Ostia BM 133
Vienna
P 9 Annona Krausz 118 (= Bement, 641)
P 10 Arch Ars Classica, 1176
P 11 Arch BM 185
A 5 (b) P 11 Arch Vierordt, 889
P 12 Decursio r. BM 147
Oxford
Stiavelli, 405
A 6 (e) P 10 Arch Copenhagen
Cambridge
Hall, 1088
Oxford photo
P 30 Decursio r. Oxford
A 7 (g) P 30 Decursio r. Rome, Terme
A 8 (e) P 31 Annona Naples
P 13 Arch Helbing 1926, 1442
A 9 (e) P 13 Arch BM 187
Ars Classica 13, 1175
P 14 Decursio l. Santamaria F.P.L. 16 (1937), 317
A 10 (e) P 14 Decursio l. BM photo
P 15 Congiarium l. BM 137
Paris
Naples
Sydenham, 31
Hall, 1072
Ars Classica 13, 1166
A 11 (f) P 14 Decursio l. BM 152
P 32 Decursio l. Vautier, 325
P 16 Ostia BM 135
Paris
Glasgow
Oxford
P 17 Ostia Naples
P 18 Ostia Ars Classica 16, 1577
P 19 Ostia Paris
Glasgow
A 12 (e) P 16 Ostia Paris
P 20 Decursio l. ANS
Stockholm
A 13 (f) P 14 Decursio l. Bement, 650
P 21 Decursio l. Fitzwilliam, 34
P 19 Ostia Paris
A 14 (e) P 19 Ostia Rome, Terme
P 22 Decursio r. Vierordt Pt. 2, 335
P 23 Decursio l. BM 148
Vatican
A 15 (e) P 23 Decursio l. ANS
P 24 Decursio l. Glasgow
A 16 (h) P 24 Decursio l. ANS
P 23 Decursio l. Paris
Prince W. II, 584
A 17 (e) P 21 Decursio l. Cambridge
Signorelli Pt. 2, P. & P. Santamaria, June 4, 1952, no. 1144
P 25 Decursio l. Naples
P 26 Arch Hoskier, 536
A 18 (e) P 21 Decursio 1. Oxford photo
P 27 Decursio l. Oxford
P 28 Janus TERRA J. Hirsch 12, 463
door 1.
P 29 Decursio 1. Oxford
Cambridge
A 19 (e) P 29 Decursio l. Paris
Glasgow

PLATES

THE WESTERN COINAGES OF NERO

I

image

II

image

III

image

IV

image

V

image

VI

image

VII

image

VIII

image

IX

image

X

image

XI

image

XII

image

XIII

image

XIV

image

XV

image

XVI

image

XVII

image

XVIII

image

XIX

image

XX

image

XXI

image

XXII

image

XXIII

image

XXIV

BUST OF NERO (Front view)

image

XXV

BUST OF NERO (Profile)

image